Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: An Effective Method to Reduce Cesarean

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 309-319

  Sabol, Bethany ^a   Denman, Mary Anna ^a   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a,b,c  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine   (United States)

^c Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean; evidence based medicine; Pregnancy; vaginal birth after cesarean

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COUNSELING; DELIVERY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION; TRIAL OF LABOR; ADVERSE EFFECTS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTERINE RUPTURE;

CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRIAL OF LABOR; UNITED STATES; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 84957380210     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000101     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fast-Facts: Inpatient Surgery. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/inpatient-surgery.htm. Accessed July 15, 2014.
2. Placek PJ, Taffel SM. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s. Am J Public Health. 1988;5: 512-515.
3. Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S. Births: preliminary data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57: 1-23.
4. Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014;63:1-16.
5. Hamilton B, Martin J, Osterman M, et al. Births: preliminary data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014;63:1-6.
6. Cesarean Section. Rates for total cesarean section, primary cesarean section, and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), United States, 1989-2012. March 1, 2014. Available at: http://www.child birthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10554. Accessed August 10, 2014.
7. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl JMed. 1996;335: 689-695.
8. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:3-8.
9. Healthy People 2010. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/. Accessed July 20, 2014.
10. Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala S, Brown SS, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1279-1295.
11. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistVaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery Practice Bulletin No 115. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist; 2010;116:450-463.
12. Martel MJ, Mackinnon CJ, The Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, et al. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines: guidelines for vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;2:164-174.
13. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2009. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45%. Accessed September 1, 2014.
14. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 191. Rockyville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2010.
15. Martin J, Perry KG, Roberts WE, et al. The case for trial of labor in the patient with a prior lowsegment vertical cesarean incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:144-148.
16. Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:255-258.
17. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:12-20.
18. Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:125-133.
19. Shipp TD, Zelop C, Repke JT, et al. The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:585-589.
20. Bujold E, Hammond AO, Hendler I, et al. Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1113-1118.
21. Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, et al. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116: 967-981.
22. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:806-812.
23. Shoorel EN, Melman S, van Kujik SM, et al. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG. 2014;121: 840-847.