Conferences versus journals in computer science

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2674-2684

  Vrettas, George ^a   Sanderson, Mark ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PUBLISHING;

ACADEMIC FIELDS; CONFERENCE PAPERS; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; JOURNAL PAPER; PAPER CITATIONS;

PAPER;

EID: 84957065558     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23349     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bar-Ilan, J., (2010). Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science. Scientometrics, 83 (3), 809-824.
2. Bergstrom, C., (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 68 (5), 314-316.
3. Chen, J., &, Konstan, J.A., (2010). Conference paper selectivity and impact. Communications of the ACM, 53 (6), 79-83. doi: 10.1145/1743546.1743569
4. Fortnow, L., (2009). Viewpoint: Time for computer science to grow up. Communications of the ACM, 52 (8), 33-35.
5. Franceschet, M., (2010). The role of conference publications in CS. Commun. ACM, 53 (12), 129-132.
6. Freyne, J., Coyle, L., Smyth, B., &, Cunningham, P., (2010). Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 53 (11), 124-132.
7. Garfield, E., (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation; Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178 (4060), 471-479.
8. Harzing, A.-W., &, Van Der Wal, R., (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 41-46.
9. Hirsch, J.E., (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (46), 16569-16572.
10. Jaccard, P., (1912). The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytologist, 11 (2), 37-50.
11. Jacsõ, P., (2011). The pros and cons of Microsoft Academic Search from a bibliometric perspective. Online Information Review, 35 (6), 983-997.
12. Larivière, V., &, Gingras, Y., (2010). The impact factor's Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (2), 424-427.
13. Ley, M., (2009). DBLP: Some lessons learned. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2 (2), 1493-1500.
14. Leydesdorff, L., Radicchi, F., Bornmann, L., Castellano, C., &, Nooy, W., (2013). Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64 (11), 2299-2309.
15. Lozano, G.A., Larivière, V., &, Gingras, Y., (2012). The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (11), 2140-2145.
16. Meho, L.I., &, Yang, K., (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 2105-2125.
17. Rahm, E., (2008). Comparing the scientific impact of conference and journal publications in computer science. Information Services and Use, 28 (2), 127-128.
18. Rahm, E., &, Thor, A., (2005). Citation analysis of database publications. ACM Sigmod Record, 34 (4), 48-53.
19. Roy, S.B., De Cock, M., Mandava, V., Savanna, S., Dalessandro, B., Perlich, C.,... (2013). The Microsoft Academic Search dataset and KDD Cup 2013. In Proceedings of the 2013 KDD Cup 2013 Workshop (p. 1).
20. Sanderson, M., (2008). Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics. Journal of the American Society of Information Science Technology, 59 (7), 1184-1190.
21. Seglen, P.O., (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314 (7079), 498.
22. Van Hemert, J., (2009). Letters to the editor. Communications of the ACM, 52 (11), 6-7.
23. Vardi, M., (2010). Conferences vs. journals in computing research. Communications of the ACM, 52 (5), 5.
24. Vardi, M., (2010). Revisiting the publication culture in computing research. Communications of the ACM, 53 (3), 5.