Quantitation of vessel morphology from 3D MRA

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1679, Issue , 1999, Pages 358-368

  Frangi, A F ^a   Niessen, W J ^a   Hoogeveen, R M ^a   Van Walsum, Th ^a   Viergever, M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

ACQUISITION PROCESS; CAROTID BIFURCATION; CENTRAL VESSEL AXIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHIC IMAGES; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; USER INTERACTION; VESSEL MORPHOLOGY; VESSEL SEGMENTS;

MORPHOLOGY;

EID: 84957047859     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/10704282_39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committe, “North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial,” Stroke, vol. 22, pp. 711-720, 1991.
2. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group, “Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery (ECST),” The Lancet, vol. 351, pp. 1379-87, 1998.
3. H. Cline, C. Dumoulin, W. Lorensen, S. Souza, and W. Adams, “Volume rendering and connectivity algorithms for MR angiography,” MRM, vol. 18, pp. 384-394, 1991.
4. C. M. Anderson, J. S. Saloner, D. Tsuruda, L. G. Shapeero, and R. E. Lee, “Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms,” Am. J. Roent., vol. 154, pp. 623-629, 1990.
5. S. Schreiner, C. B. Paschal, and R. L. Galloway, “Comparison of projection algorithms used for the construction of maximum intensity projection images,” JCAT, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 56-67, Jan-Feb1996.
6. G. Farin, Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design: A Practical Guide, Academic Press, 1990.
7. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos, “Snakes: Active contour models,” IJCV, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 321-331, 1987.
8. T. McInerney and D. Terzopoulos, “Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey,” Med. Im. Anal., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 91-108, 1996. 359
9. W. Wesselink, Variational Modeling of Curves and Surfaces, Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University, Computer Science Department, 1996.
10. A. F. Frangi, W. J. Niessen, K. L. Vincken, and M. A. Viergever, “Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering,” in MICCAI98, A. Colchester W. M. Wells and S. Delp, Eds., 1998, vol. 1496 of LNCS, pp. 130-137.
11. T. Lindeberg, “Feature detection with automatic scale selection,” IJCV, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 79-116, Nov. 1998.
12. L. Piegl and W. Tiller, The NURBS Book, Monographs in Visual Communication. Springer, 1996.
13. R. M. Hoogeveen, C. J. G. Bakker, and M. A. Viergever, “Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography,” J. Magn. Reson. Imag., vol. 8, pp. 1228-35, 1998. 361
14. W. E. Lorensen and H. E. Cline, “Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface reconstruction algorith,” Proc. SIGGRAPH’87, vol. 21, pp. 163-169, 1987. 362
15. R. F. Smith, B. K. Rutt, A. J. Fox, R. N. Rankin, and D. W. Holdsworth, “Geometric characterization of stenoted human carotid arteries,” Acad. Radiol., vol. 3, pp. 898-911, 1996.
16. Th. Koller, G. Gerig, G. Székely, and D. Dettwiler, “Multiscale detection of Curvilinear Structures in 2-D and 3-D Image Data,” in Proc. ICCV95, 1995, pp. 864-869, IEEE Computer Society Press.
17. Y. Sato, S. Nakajima, N. Shiraga, H. Atsumi, S. Yoshida, T. Koller, G. Gerig, and R. Kikinis, “Three-dimensional multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images,” Med. Im. Anal., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 143-168, June 1998.
18. C. Lorenz, I.-C. Carlsen, Buzug T.M., C. Fassnacht, and J. Weese, “Multi-scale line segmentation with automatic estimation of width, contrast and tangential direction in 2D and 3D medical images,” in Proc. CVRMed-MRCAS’97, J. Troccaz, E. Grimson, and R. Mösges, Eds., 1997, LNCS, pp. 233-242, Springer-Verlag.
19. S. Aylward, E. Bullit, S. Pizer, and D. Eberly, “Intensity ridge and widths for tubular object segmentation and description,” in Proc. IEEE/SIAM Workshop on Math. Meth. in Biomed. Im. Anal., 1996, pp. 131-8.
20. X. M. Pan, D. Saloner, L. M. Reilly, J. C. Bowersox, S. P. Murray, C. M Anderson, G. A. Gooding, and J. H. Rapp, “Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurements of plaque stenosis,” J. Vasc. Surg., vol. 21, pp. 82-89, 1995.
21. O. E. H. Elgersma, P. C. Buijs, A.F.J. Wüst, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelb oom, and W. P. Th. M. Mali, “Assessment of maximum internal carotid artery stenosis: Rotational vs. conventional intra arterial digital substraction angiography,” Radiol., accepted, 1999.