Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Brentnall, Adam R ^a   Harkness, Elaine F ^b,c   Astley, Susan M ^b,c   Donnelly, Louise S ^b   Stavrinos, Paula ^b,c   Sampson, Sarah ^b   Fox, Lynne ^b   Sergeant, Jamie C ^b,c   Harvie, Michelle N ^b   Wilson, Mary ^b   Beetles, Ursula ^b   Gadde, Soujanya ^b   Lim, Yit ^b   Jain, Anil ^b,c   Bundred, Sara ^b   Barr, Nicola ^b   Reece, Valerie ^b   Howell, Anthony ^b,d   Cuzick, Jack ^a   Evans, D Gareth R ^b,c,d  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GAIL MODEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TYRER CUZICK MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM; ABNORMALITIES; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MAMMARY GLAND; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

AGED; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84956745016     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Howell A, Anderson AS, Clarke RB, Duffy SW, Evans DG, Garcia-Closas M, et al. Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:446.
2. Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Doroshenk D, Saslow D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:30-51.
3. Evans DG, Brentnall AR, Harvie M, Dawe S, Sergeant JC, Stavrinos P, et al. Breast cancer risk in young women in the National Breast Screening Programme: implications for applying NICE guidelines for additional screening and chemoprevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014;7:993-1001.
4. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1879-86.
5. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med. 2004;23:1111-30.
6. Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Benichou J, et al. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1541-8.
7. Gail MH, Mai PL. Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:665-8.
8. Amir E, Evans DG, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Moran A, Boggis C, et al. Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme. J Med Genet. 2003;40:807-14.
9. Quante AS, Whittemore AS, Shriver T, Strauch K, Terry MB. Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R144.
10. Assi V, Warwick J, Cuzick J, Duffy SW. Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;9:33-40.
11. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
12. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:337-47.
13. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94:115-22.
14. Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, Vacek PM, Titus-Ernstoff L, Carney PA, et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1204-14.
15. McCormack VA, Santos SI. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159-69.
16. Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, Duffy SW, Cawthorn S, Howell A, et al. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:744-52.
17. Kim J, Han W, Moon HG, Ahn SK, Shin HC, You JM, et al. Breast density change as a predictive surrogate for response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R102. A published erratum appears in Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:403.
18. Li J, Humphreys K, Eriksson L, Edgren G, Czene K, Hall P. Mammographic density reduction is a prognostic marker of response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2249-56.
19. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, Graubard B, Schairer C, Byrne C, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1215-26.
20. Warwick J, Birke H, Stone J, Warren RM, Pinney E, Brentnall AR, et al. Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:451.
21. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:1629-38.
22. Sergeant JC, Walshaw L, Wilson M, Seed S, Barr N, Beetles U, et al. Same task, same observers, different values: the problem with visual assessment of breast density. In: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 8673, Medical Imaging 2013: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 86730T; 28 Mar 2013. doi: 10.1117/12.2006778.
23. Evans DGR, Warwick J, Astley SM, Stavrinos P, Sahin S, Ingham S, et al. Assessing individual breast cancer risk within the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program: a new paradigm for cancer prevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012;5:943-51.
24. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, Gillan MG, Boggis CR, Griffiths PM, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology. 2006;241:47-53.
25. National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). Guidelines for pathology reporting of breast disease. NHSBSP Publication 58. Sheffield, UK: NHS Screening Programmes; 2005.
26. Crowder MJ, Hand DJ. Analysis of repeated measures. London: Chapman & Hall; 1990.
27. Copas JB. Plotting p against x. Appl Stat. 1983;32:25-31.
28. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1998;44:837-45.
29. R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
30. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet. 2001;358:1389-99.
31. Sperrin M, Bardwell L, Sergeant JC, Astley S, Buchan I. Correcting for rater bias in scores on a continuous scale, with application to breast density. Stat Med. 2013;32:4666-78.
32. Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Astley SM, Gillan MG, McGee MA, Boggis CR, et al. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R64.