Camouflage predicts survival in ground-nesting birds

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Troscianko, Jolyon ^a   Wilson Aggarwal, Jared ^a   Stevens, Martin ^a   Spottiswoode, Claire N ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; LUMINANCE; NESTING; PHENOTYPE; PREDATOR; SURVIVAL RATE; VISUAL SYSTEM; WILD ANIMAL; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MIMICRY; COLOR; PREDATION; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MIMICRY; BIRDS; COLOR; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84956690190     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep19966     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wallace, A. R. Darwinism: An exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications. (MacMillan, 1889).
2. Cott, H. B. Adaptive Coloration in Animals. (Oxford University Press, 1940).
3. Stevens, M., Merilaita, S. Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 481-488 (2009).
4. Cuthill, I. C. et al. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434, 72-74 (2005).
5. Skelhorn, J., Rowland, H. M., Speed, M. P., Ruxton, G. D. Masquerade: camouflage without crypsis. Science 327, 51-51 (2010).
6. Kettlewell, H. B. D. Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9, 323-42 (1955).
7. Cook, L. M., Grant, B. S., Saccheri, I. J., Mallet, J. Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus. Biol. Lett. 8, 609-612 (2012).
8. Majerus, M. E., Majerus, M. Melanism: evolution in action. (Oxford University Press Oxford, 1998).
9. Troscianko, J., Stevens, M. Image calibration and analysis toolbox-a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern. Methods Ecol Evol 6, 1320-1331 (2015).
10. Solis, J. C., De Lope, F. Nest and egg crypsis in the ground-nesting stone curlew Burhinus oedicnemus. J. Avian Biol. 135-138 (1995).
11. Lee, W.-S., Kwon, Y.-S., Yoo, J.-C. Egg survival is related to the colour matching of eggs to nest background in Black-tailed Gulls. J. Ornithol. 151, 765-770 (2010).
12. Stevens, M., Parraga, C. A., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C., Troscianko, T. S. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90, 211-237 (2007).
13. Blanco, G., Bertellotti, M. Differential predation by mammals and birds: implications for egg-colour polymorphism in a nomadic breeding seabird. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75, 137-146 (2002).
14. Gmark, F. Blue eggs do not reduce nest predation in the song thrush, Turdus philomelos. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 245-252 (1992).
15. Hanley, D., Cassey, P., Doucet, S. M. Parents, predators, parasites, and the evolution of eggshell colour in open nesting birds. Evol. Ecol. 27, 593-617 (2013).
16. Tinbergen, N. et al. Egg shell removal by the black-headed gull, Larus ridibundus L.; a behaviour component of camouflage. Behaviour 74-117 (1962).
17. Yahner, R. H., Mahan, C. G. Effects of egg type on depredation of artificial ground nests. Wilson Bull. 129-136 (1996).
18. Castilla, A. M., Dhondt, A. A., Dz-Uriarte, R., Westmoreland, D. Predation in ground-nesting birds: an experimental study using natural egg-color variation. Avian Conserv. Ecol.-Écologie Conserv. Oiseaux 2, 2 (2007).
19. Colwell, M. A. et al. Western Snowy Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus select nesting substrates that enhance egg crypsis and improve nest survival. Ibis 153, 303-311 (2011).
20. Troscianko, J., Lown, A. E., Hughes, A. E., Stevens, M. Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies. PloS One 8, e73733 (2013).
21. Blumstein, D. T. Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim. Behav. 71, 389-399 (2006).
22. Hockey P. A. R., Dean W. R. J., Ryan P. G. Roberts' Birds of Southern Africa. (The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town, 2005).
23. Stevens, M., Stoddard, M. C., Higham, J. P. Studying primate color: towards visual system-dependent methods. Int. J. Primatol. 30, 893-917 (2009).
24. Troscianko, J. A simple tool for calculating egg shape, volume and surface area from digital images. Ibis 156, 874-878 (2014).
25. Lovell, P. G. et al. Stability of the color-opponent signals under changes of illuminant in natural scenes. JOSA A 22, 2060-2071 (2005).
26. Praga, C. A., Troscianko, T., Tolhurst, D. J. Spatiochromatic properties of natural images and human vision. Curr. Biol. 12, 483-487 (2002).
27. Pike, T. W. Using digital cameras to investigate animal colouration: estimating sensor sensitivity functions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 849-858 (2011).
28. Stevens, M., Cuthill, I. C. Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2141-2147 (2006).
29. Jacobs, G. H., Deegan, J. F. Uniformity of colour vision in Old World monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci 266, 2023-2028 (1999).
30. deen, A., Htad, O. The phylogenetic distribution of ultraviolet sensitivity in birds. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13, 36 (2013).
31. Stoddard, M. C., Stevens, M. Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird's eye. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 1387-1393 (2010).
32. Osorio, D., Vorobyev, M. Photoreceptor sectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 1745-1752 (2005).
33. Calderone, J. B., Jacobs, G. H. Spectral properties and retinal distribution of ferret cones. Vis. Neurosci. 20, 11-17 (2003).
34. Hart, N. S. Vision in the peafowl (Aves: Pavo cristatus). J. Exp. Biol. 205, 3925-3935 (2002).
35. Chiao, C.-C., Chubb, C., Buresch, K., Siemann, L., Hanlon, R. T. The scaling effects of substrate texture on camouflage patterning in cuttlefish. Vision Res. 49, 1647-1656 (2009).
36. Godfrey, D., Lythgoe, J. N., Rumball, D. A. Zebra stripes and tiger stripes: the spatial frequency distribution of the pattern compared to that of the background is significant in display and crypsis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32, 427-433 (1987).
37. Feeney, W. E., Troscianko, J., Langmore, N. E., Spottiswoode, C. N. Evidence for aggressive mimicry in an adult brood parasitic bird, and generalized defences in its host. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150795 (2015).
38. Vorobyev, M., Osorio, D. Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265, 351-358 (1998).
39. Hofer, H., Carroll, J., Neitz, J., Neitz, M., Williams, D. R. Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic. J. Neurosci. 25, 9669-9679 (2005).
40. R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013). at http://www.R-project.org/(Date of access 16/10/2015).
41. Therneau, T. Coxme: Mixed Effects Cox Models. (2012).at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package= coxme (Date of access: 16/10/2015).