Linking human and natural systems in the planning process

Urban-Rural Interfaces: Linking People and Nature

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 275-286

  Stewart, Susan I ^a   Mockrin, Miranda H ^b   Hammer, Roger B ^c  

^a Rocky Mountain Research Station ^*  (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental plan; Human society; Incremental plan; Natural systems; Planning theory; Resource management planning; Scientific basis; Urban rural interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956621148     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.2136/2012.urban-rural.c15     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Allmendinger, P. 2001. Planning in postmodern times. Routledge, New York.
2. Baumann, N. 2006. Ground-nesting birds on green roofs in Switzerland: Preliminary observations. Urban Habitats 4(1). http://www.urbanhabitats.org (accessed 28 Sept. 2011).
3. Cadenasso, M.L., S.T.A. Pickett, and M.J. Grove. 2006. Integrative approaches to investigating human-natural systems: The Baltimore ecosystem study. Nat. Sci. Soc. 14:4-14. doi:10.1051/nss:2006002
4. Campbell, L., and A. Wiesen, editors. 2009. Restorative commons: Creating health and well-being through urban landscapes. Gen. Tech Rep. NRS-P-39. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Stn., Newtown Square, PA. p. 11-23.
5. Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1987. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(15):253-260.
6. Ecological Society of America’s Committee on Land Use. 2000. Ecological principles for managing land use. http://esa.sdsc.edu/esalanduse.htm (accessed 12 Aug. 2011).
7. Environmental Law Institute. 2003. Conservation thresholds for land use planners. Washington, DC.
8. Farber, S.C., R. Costanza, and M.A. Wilson. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 41:375-392. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
9. Foderaro, L.W. 2011. A city of glass towers, and as hazard for migratory birds. The New York Times. 14 Sept. 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/nyregion/makingnew-yorks-glass-buildings-safer-for-birds.html (accessed 7 Sept. 2011).
10. Fox, H.E., C. Christian, J.C. Nordby, O.R.W. Pergams, G.D. Peterson, and R.R. Pyke. 2006. Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20(6):1817-1820. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00598.x
11. Francis, R.A., and J. Lorimer. 2011. Urban reconciliation ecology: The potential of living roofs and walls. J. Environ. Manage. 92(6):1429-1437. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.012
12. Goddard, M.A., A.J. Dougill, and T.G. Benton. 2010. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25(2):90-98. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016
13. Hibbard, M., and J. Madsen. 2003. Environmental resistance to place-based collaboration in the U.S. West. Soc. Nat. Res.16(8):703-718.
14. Hoberg, G. 2004. Science, politics, and U.S. Forest Service law: The battle over the Forest Service planning rule. Nat. Resour. J. 44:1-27.
15. Hull, R.B., and S.I. Stewart. 2002. Social consequences of change: Implications for forests and forestry. In: E.A. Macie, and L.A. Hermansen, editors, Human influences on forest ecosystems: The southern wildland-urban interface assessment. GTR-SRS-55. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
16. Jacobson, S.K. 2009. Communication skills for conservation professionals. Island Press, Washington, DC.
17. Johnson, E.A., and M.W. Klemens, editors. 2005. Nature in fragments: The legacy of sprawl. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
18. Karvonen, A. 2010. MetronaturalTM: Inventing and reworking urban nature in Seattle. Prog. Plan. 74(4):153-202. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2010.07.001
19. Klem, D., C.J. Farmer, N. Delacretaz, Y. Gelb, and P.G. Saenger. 2009. Architectural and landscape risk factors associated with bird-glass collisions in an urban environment. Wilson J. Ornith. 121:126-134. doi:10.1676/08-068.1
20. Kadas, G. 2006. Rare invertebrates colonizing green roofs in London. Urban Habitats 4(1). http://www.urbanhabitats.org (accessed 28 Sept. 2011).
21. Kaplan, S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward and integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15:169-182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
22. Lambright, W.H. 2008. Government and science: A troubled, critical relationship and what can be done about it. Public Adm. Rev. 68(1):5-18. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00830.x
23. Lawrence, D.P. 2000. Planning theories and environmental impact assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 20:607-625. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00036-6
24. Luck, G.W., P. Davidson, D. Boxall, and L. Smallbone. 2011. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv. Biol. 25(4):816-826. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x
25. Maller, C., M. Townsend, A. Pryor, P. Brown, and L. St Leger. 2006. Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot. Int. 21(1):45-54. doi:10.1093/heapro/dai032
26. McCaffrey, S.M. 2009. Crucial factors influencing public acceptance of fuels treatments. Fire Manage. Today 69(1): 9-12.
27. McCaffrey, S.M., and G. Winter. 2011. Understanding homeowner preparation and intended actions when threatened by a wildfire In: S.M. McCaffrey and C.L. Fisher, editors, Proceedings of the Second Conference on the Human Dimensions of Wildland Fire. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-84. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Stn., Newtown Square, PA.
28. Mentens, J., D. Raes, and M. Hermy. 2006. Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century? Landsc. Urban Plan. 77(3):217-226. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.010
29. Nie, M., and M. Feibig. 2010. Managing the national forests through place-based legislation. Ecol. Law Q. 37(1):2-50.
30. Peterson, G.L., and A. Randall, editors. 1984. Valuation of wildland resource benefits. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
31. Pickett, S.T.A., M.L. Cadenasso, P.M. Groffman, and J.M. Grove. 2012. Importance of integrated approaches and perspectives. In: D.N. Laband, B.G. Lockaby, and W. Zipperer, editors, Urban-rural interfaces: Linking people and nature. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 259-274, this volume.
32. Pickett, S.T.A, M.L. Cadenasso, and J.M. Grove 2004. Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape Urban Plan. 69:369-384.
33. Rosenau, P.M. 1992. Postmodernism and the social sciences. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
34. Seabrook, L., C.A. Mcalpine, and M.E. Bowen. 2011. Restore, repair or reinvent: Options for sustainable landscapes in a changing climate, Landscape Urban Plan. 100(4):407-410. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.015.
35. Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing like a state. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
36. Schroeder, H.W. 1996. Voices from Michigan’s Black River: Obtaining information on “special places” for natural resource planning. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-184. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Stn., St. Paul, MN.
37. Schmid, A.A. 1989. Benefit-cost analysis: A political economy approach. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
38. Steelman, T.A. 2001. Elite and participatory policy making: Finding a balance in a case of Nation Forest planning. Policy Stud. J. 29(1):71-89. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02075.x
39. Stewart, S.I., P.J. Jakes, and P. Monson. 1998. Emergent issues in forest plan revision: A dialogue. In: H. Vogelsong, editor, Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. GTR NE-241. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Stn., Radnor, PA. p. 220-224.
40. Stewart, W.P., D.R. Williams, and L.E. Kruger, editors. 2012. Place-based conservation: Perspectives from the social sciences. Springer, New York. (in press) Tortorello, M. 2011. Finding the potential in vacant lots-In the Garden. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/04/garden/finding-the-potential-in-vacantlots-in-the-garden.html (accessed 3 Aug. 2011).
41. Ulrich, R.S. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420-421. doi:10.1126/science.6143402
42. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. 1992. Forest Service planning: Accommodating uses, producing outputs, and sustaining ecosystems. OTA-F-505. USGPO, Washington, DC.
43. Westphal, L.M. 2003. Urban greening and social benefits: A study of empowerment outcomes. J. Arboric. 29(3):137-147.
44. Westphal, L.M., P.H. Gobster, and M. Gross. 2010. Models for renaturing brownfield areas. In: M. Hall, editor, Restoration and history: The search for a usable environmental past. Routledge, New York. p. 208-217.
45. Williams, D. R. 2008. Pluralities of place: A user’s guide to place concepts, theories, and philosophies in natural resource management. In: L.E. Kruger, T.E. Hall, and M.C. Stiefel editors, Understanding concepts of place in recreation research and management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-744. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. p. 7-30.
46. Williams, B.A., and A.R. Matheny. 1995. Democracy, dialogue and environmental disputes: The contested languages of social regulation. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
47. Williams, D.R., and S.I. Stewart. 1998. Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a place in ecosystem management. J. For. 96(5):18-23.
48. Wondolleck, J.M., and S.L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
49. Yaffee, S., and J.M. Wondolleck. 2003. Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges. Environments 31:2.