A Sampling Framework for Uncertainty in Individual Environmental Decisions

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 242-258

  Galesic, Mirta ^a,b   Kause, Astrid ^a   Gaissmaier, Wolfgang ^a,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Decision making; Environment; Public policy; Risk; Sampling; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK; SAMPLING STUDIES; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84956588170     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12172     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M., Davidson, C. I., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16054-16059.
2. Barrett, S., & Dannenberg, A. (2014). Sensitivity of collective action to uncertainty about climate tipping points. Nature Climate Change, 4, 36-39.
3. Bodemer, N., & Feufel, M. (2012). Finding the right tool to improve health decisions: Nudging, social marketing, or empowerment? In N. Bodemer, Transparency in information about health - improving medical decision making (Doctoral dissertation). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany. Available at http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/bodemer-nicolai-2012-12-03/PDF/bodemer.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2015.
4. Bond, M. (2009). Risk school. Nature, 461, 1189-1192.
5. Brewer, G. D., & Stern, P. C. (2005). Decision making for the environment: Social and behavioral science research priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
6. Brighton, H., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Are rational actor models "rational" outside small worlds? In K. Binmore & S. Okasha (Eds.), Evolution and rationality: Decisions, co-operation and strategic behaviour (pp. 84-109). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bruine de Bruin, W., & Bostrom, A. (2013). Assessing what to address in science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 14062-14068.
8. Budescu, D., Por, H., Broomell, S. B., & Smithson, M. (2014). The interpretation of IPCC probabilistic statements around the world. Nature Climate Change, 4, 508-512.
9. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
10. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 2-8.
11. Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112, 951-978.
12. Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18452-18456.
13. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2014). Emission standards reference guide. Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/standards/. Accessed October 27, 2015.
14. Etkin, D., & Ho, E. (2007). Climate change: Perceptions and discourses of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 10, 623-641.
15. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659-676.
16. Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fox, C. R., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2003). Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 14, 195-200.
18. Galesic, M., Olsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2012). Social sampling explains apparent biases in judgments of social environments. Psychological Science, 23, 1515-1523.
19. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Available at: http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/September-October%202008/gardner-stern-full.html. Accessed October 27, 2015.
20. Gentner, D. (2002). Psychology of mental models. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Bates (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 9683-9697). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
21. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107-143.
22. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451-482.
23. Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York: Wiley.
24. Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Arora, N. K. (2011). Varieties of uncertainty in health care: A conceptual taxonomy. Medical Decision Making, 31, 828-838.
25. Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., & Madow, W. G. (1953). Sample survey methods and theory. New York: Wiley.
26. Ibrekk, H., & Morgan, M. (1987). Graphical communication of uncertain quantities to nontechnical people. Risk Analysis, 7, 519-529.
27. IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. WG II AR5 Summary for policymakers (pp. 1-44). Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Available at https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/IPCC_WG2AR5_SPM_Approved.pdf.
28. Joslyn, S. L., & LeClerc, J. E. (2012). Uncertainty forecasts improve weather-related decisions and attenuate the effects of forecast error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 126-140.
29. Juslin, P., Winman, A., & Hansson, P. (2007). The naïve intuitive statistician: A naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. Psychological Review, 114, 678-703.
30. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735.
31. Kandlikar, M., Risbey, J., & Dessai, S. (2005). Representing and communicating deep uncertainty in climate-change assessments. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 337, 443-455.
32. Kempton, W. (1986). Two theories of home heat control. Cognitive Science, 10, 75-90.
33. Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley.
34. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
35. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., & Marlon, J. (2013). Climate change in the american mind. Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in November 2013. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University.
36. Lempert, R. J. (2002). A new decision sciences for complex systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7309-7313.
37. Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Popular consensus: Climate change is set to continue. Psychological Science, 22, 460-463.
38. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2012). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399-404.
39. Lewandowsky, S., Risbey, J. S., Smithson, M., Newell, B. R., & Hunter, J. (2014). Scientific uncertainty and climate change: Part I. Uncertainty and unabated emissions. Climatic Change, 124, 21-37.
40. Lo, A. W., & Mueller, M. T. (2010). WARNING: Physics envy may be hazardous to your wealth! Working paper. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1563882. Accessed March 12, 2010.
41. Longman, T., Turner, R., King, M., & McCaffery, K. (2012). The effects of communicating uncertainty in quantitative health risk estimates. Patient Education and Counseling, 89, 252-259.
42. Maibach, E., Myers, T., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Earth's future climate scientists need to set the record straight: There is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earth's Future, 2, 1-4.
43. Marcell, K., Agyeman, J., & Rappaport, A. (2004). Cooling the campus: Experiences from a pilot study to reduce electricity use at Tufts University, USA, using social marketing methods. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5, 169-189.
44. Marewski, J. N., Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Good judgments do not require complex cognition. Cognitive Processing, 11, 103-121.
45. Mastrandrea, M. D., Field, C. B., Stocker, T. F., Edenhofer, O., Ebi, K. L., Frame, D. J., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Mach, K. J., Matschoss, P. R., Plattner, G-K., Yohe, G. W., & Zwiers, F. W. (2010). Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC).
46. Matulka, R. (2014). Resolve to save energy this year. Available at: http://www.energy.gov/articles/resolve-save-energy-year. Accessed October 27, 2015.
47. Meder, B., Le Lec, F., & Osman, M. (2013). Decision making in uncertain times: What can cognitive and decision sciences say about or learn from economic crises? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 257-260.
48. Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 52, 12-23.
50. Oppenheimer, R. (1956). Analogy in science. American Psychologist, 11, 127-135.
51. Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 63-73.
52. Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35-41.
53. Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., & Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109, 472-491.
54. Reisinger, A., & Larsen, H. (2007). Recognizing ethics to help a constructive climate change debate. In J. Boston, A. Bradstock, & D. Eng (Eds.), Public policy: Why ethics matters (pp. 117-139). Canberra: ANU Press.
55. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Cengage Learning.
56. Shah, P., Freedman, E. G., & Vekiri, I. (2006). The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 426-476). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Smithson, M. (2008). The many faces and masks of uncertainty. In G. Bammer & M. Smithson (Eds.), Uncertainty and risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 13-25). London: Earthscan Publications.
58. Smithson, M., Bartos, T., & Takemura, K. (2000). Human judgment under sample space ignorance. Risk Decision and Policy, 5, 135-150.
59. Spiegelhalter, D., Pearson, M., & Short, I. (2011). Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science, 333, 1393-1400.
60. Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Riesch, H. (2011). Don't know, can't know: Embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 4730-4750.
61. Stephens, E. M., Edwards, T. L., & Demeritt, D. (2012). Communicating probabilistic information from climate model ensembles-lessons from numerical weather prediction. WIRes: Climate Change, 3, 409-426.
62. Sterman, J. D. (2008). Risk communication on climate: Mental models and mass balance. Science, 322, 532-533.
63. Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1-26.
65. U.S. Global Change Research Program/Climate Change Science Program (2009). Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate sciences. Available at http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/literacy/climate_literacy.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2015.
66. Walker, W. E., Harremoes, P., Rotmans, J., Van der Slujis, J. P., Van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., & Krayer von Krauss, M. P. (2003). Defining uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4, 5-17.
67. Walker, W. E., Lempert, R. J., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2013). Deep uncertainty. In J. J. Cochran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 395-402). New York: Springer.
68. Wilson, C., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2007). Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 169-203.
69. Wynne, B. (1992). Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2, 111-127.