The faces in infant-perspective scenes change over the first year of life

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Jayaraman, Swapnaa ^a   Fausey, Caitlin M ^b   Smith, Linda B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EYE; HEAD; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; STATISTICS; WAKEFULNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; MALE; NEWBORN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 84955756411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123780     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci, 2000. 4(6): p. 223-233. PMID: 10827445
2. Cohen LB, Cashon CH. Do 7-month-old infants process independent features or facial configurations? Infant and child development, 2001. 10(1-2): p. 83-92.
3. Calder AJ, Young AW. Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2005. 6(8): p. 641-651. PMID: 16062171
4. Kanwisher N, Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2006. 361(1476): p. 2109-2128. PMID: 17118927
5. Zhao L, Bentin S. Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age. Psychon Bull Rev, 2008. 15(6): p. 1093-1099. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1093 PMID: 19001573
6. McKone E, Kanwisher N, Duchaine BC. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends Cogn Sci, 2007. 11(1): p. 8-15. PMID: 17129746
7. Tarr MJ, Gauthier I. FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat Neurosci, 2000. 3(8): p. 764-769. PMID: 10903568
8. Goren CC, Sarty M, Wu PY. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 1975. 56(4): p. 544-549. PMID: 1165958
9. Johnson MH, Dziurawiec S, Ellis H, Morton J. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 1991. 40(1-2): p. 1-19. PMID: 1786672
10. Pascalis O, Kelly DJ. The origins of face processing in humans: Phylogeny and ontogeny. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009. 4(2): p. 200-209.
11. De Heering A, Rossion B, Maurer D. Developmental changes in face recognition during childhood: Evidence from upright and inverted faces. Cognitive Development, 2012. 27(1): p. 17-27.
12. McKone E, Crookes K, Jeffery L, Dilks DD. A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2012. 29(1-2): p. 174-212. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.753433 PMID: 23428079
13. Cohen Kadosh K, Johnson MH. Developing a cortex specialized for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007. 11(9): p. 367-369. PMID: 17631408
14. Nelson CA. Can we develop a neurobiological model of human social-emotional development? Integrative thoughts on the effects of separation on parent-child interactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2003. 1008: p. 48-54. PMID: 14998871
15. Slater A, Quinn PC, Kelly DJ, Lee K, Longmore CA, McDonald PR, et al. The Shaping of the Face Space in Early Infancy: Becoming a Native Face Processor. Child Dev Perspect, 2010. 4(3): p. 205-211. PMID: 21562620
16. Sugden NA, Mohamed-Ali MI, Moulson MC. I spy with my little eye: typical, daily exposure to faces documented from a first-person infant perspective. Dev Psychobiol, 2014. 56(2): p. 249-261. doi: 10.1002/ dev.21183 PMID: 24285109
17. Wooding AR, Boyd J, Geddis DC. Sleep patterns of New Zealand infants during the first 12 months of life. J Paediatr Child Health, 1990. 26(2): p. 85-88. PMID: 2361072
18. Nelson CA. The development of face recognition reflects an experience-expectant and activitydependent process. 2003.
19. de Haan M, Pascalis O, Johnson MH. Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. J Cogn Neurosci, 2002. 14(2): p. 199-209. PMID: 11970786
20. Scott LS, Monesson A. Experience-dependent neural specialization during infancy. Neuropsychologia, 2010. 48(6): p. 1857-1861. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.008 PMID: 20153343
21. Heron-Delaney M, Anzures G, Herbert JS, Quinn PC, Slater AM, Tanaka JM, et al. Perceptual training prevents the emergence of the other race effect during infancy. PLOS One, 2011. 6(5): p. e19858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019858 PMID: 21625638
22. Tanaka J, Gauthier I. Expertise in object and face recognition. Psychology of learning and motivation, 1997. 36: p. 83-125.
23. Balas B, Saville A. N170 face specificity and face memory depend on hometown size. Neuropsychologia, 2015.
24. Dobson V, Teller DY, Belgum J. Visual acuity in human infants assessed with stationary stripes and phase-alternated checkerboards. Vision Res, 1978. 18(9): p. 1233-1238. PMID: 716244
25. Oruc I, Barton JJS. Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: evidence for limited scale invariance for faces. J Vis, 2010. 10(12): p. 20-20. doi: 10.1167/10.12.20 PMID: 21047752
26. Maurer D, Lewis TL. Visual acuity: the role of visual input in inducing postnatal change. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 2001. 1(4): p. 239-247.
27. Maurer D, Lewis TL. Visual acuity and spatial contrast sensitivity: Normal development and underlying mechanisms. Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2001: p. 237-250.
28. Smith L, Yu C, Yoshida H, Fausey CM. Contributions of Head-Mounted Cameras to Studying the Visual Environments of Infants and Young Children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2014(justaccepted). PMID: 25554726
29. Hofferth SL. Child care in the United States today. The Future of Children, 1996: p. 41-61. PMID: 8972127
30. Morrissey TW, Banghart P. Family child care in the United States. 2007.
31. Kreader JL, Ferguson D, Lawrence S. Infant and toddler child care arrangements. 2005.
32. Cummings MF, Van Hof-Van Duin J, Mayer DL, Hansen RM, Fulton AB. Visual fields of young children. Behavioural brain research, 1988. 29(1): p. 7-16.
33. de Schonen S, McKenzie B, Maury L, Bresson F. Central and peripheral object distances as determinants of the effective visual field in early infancy. Perception, 1978. 7(5): p. 499-506. PMID: 733441
34. Tabuchi A, Maeda F, Haruishi K, Nakata D, Nishimura N. Visual Field in Young Children. Neuro-Ophthalmology, 2003. 20(3): p. 342-349.
35. Schmitow C, Stenberg G, Billard A, Von Hofsten C. Using a head-mounted camera to infer attention direction. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2013. 37(5): p. 468-474.
36. Aslin RN. How infants view natural scenes gathered from a head-mounted camera. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2009. 86(6): p. 561.
37. Cicchino JB, Aslin RN, Rakison DH. Correspondences between what infants see and know about causal and self-propelled motion. Cognition, 2011. 118(2): p. 171-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11. 005 PMID: 21122832
38. Franchak JM, Kretch KS, Soska KC, Adolph KE. Head-Mounted Eye Tracking: A New Method to Describe Infant Looking. Child development, 2011. 82(6): p. 1738-1750. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011. 01670.x PMID: 22023310
39. Yu C, Smith LB. Smith, Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers. Cognition, 2012. 125(2): p. 244-262. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.016 PMID: 22878116
40. Pereira AF, Smith L, Yu C. A bottom-up view of toddler word learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2014. 21(1): p. 178-185.
41. James KH, Jones SS, Smith LB, Swain SN. Young children's self-generated object views and object recognition. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2013(just-accepted). PMID: 24955035
42. Wagner D, Birt J, Snyder M, Duncanson J. Human Factors Design Guide (HFDG) for Acquisition of Commercial off-the-shelf Subsystems, Non-Developmental Items, and Developmental Systems. 1996.
43. Moulson MC, Westerlund A, Fox NA, Zeanah CH, Nelson CA. The effects of early experience on face recognition: an event-related potential study of institutionalized children in Romania. Child Dev, 2009. 80(4): p. 1039-1056. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01315.x PMID: 19630892
44. Maurer D, Mondloch CJ, Lewis TL. Sleeper effects. Developmental Science, 2007. 10(1): p. 40-47. PMID: 17181698
45. Tanaka JW, Farah MJ. Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1993. 46(2): p. 225-245. PMID: 8316637
46. Yovel G, Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr Biol, 2005. 15 (24): p. 2256-2262. PMID: 16360687
47. Cashon CH, Cohen LB. Beyond U-shaped development in infants' processing of faces: An informationprocessing account. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2004. 5(1): p. 59-80.
48. Carey S, Diamond R. Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1994. 1(2-3): p. 253-274.
49. Mondloch CJ, Pathman T, Maurer D, Le Grand R, de Schonen S. The composite face effect in six-yearold children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing. Visual Cognition, 2007. 15(5): p. 564-577. PMID: 17096171
50. Byrge L, Sporns O, Smith LB. Developmental process emerges from extended brain-body-behavior networks. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2014.
51. Johnson MH. Face perception: A developmental perspective. The Oxford handbook of face perception, 2011: p. 3-14.
52. Smith LB, Jayaraman S. Redundant constraints on human face perception? Dev Sci, 2014. 17(6): p. 826-827. doi: 10.1111/desc.12200 PMID: 24947248
53. Gottlieb G. Experiential canalization of behavioral development: Theory. Developmental Psychology, 1991. 27(1): p. 4.
54. Bornstein MH. Form and function: Implications for studies of culture and human development. Culture & Psychology, 1995. 1(1): p. 123-137.
55. Collins WA, Maccoby EE, Steinberg L, Hetherington EM, Bornstein MH. Contemporary research on parenting. The case for nature and nurture. Am Psychol, 2000. 55(2): p. 218-232. PMID: 10717969
56. Morton J, Johnson MH. CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychol Rev, 1991. 98(2): p. 164-181. PMID: 2047512
57. Senju A, Johnson MH. The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development. Trends Cogn Sci, 2009. 13(3): p. 127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009 PMID: 19217822