Incidental radiologic findings at breast cancer diagnosis and likelihood of disease recurrence

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 395-403

  Brothers, Joel M ^a   Kidwell, Kelley M ^b   Brown, Richard K J ^a   Henry, N Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone Scan; Breast Cancer; CT; Incidental Findings; PET; Staging

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISTANT METASTASIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY; BREAST TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES; RADIOLOGY; TUMOR RECURRENCE; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROBABILITY; RADIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84955739705     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3687-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Puglisi F, Follador A, Minisini AM et al (2005) Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications. Ann Oncol 16(2):263–266
2. Kasem AR, Desai A, Daniell S, Sinha P (2006) Bone scan and liver ultrasound scan in the preoperative staging for primary breast cancer. Breast J 12(6):544–548
3. Kim H, Han W, Moon HG et al (2011) The value of preoperative staging chest computed tomography to detect asymptomatic lung and liver metastasis in patients with primary breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):637–641
4. Gerber B, Seitz E, Muller H et al (2003) Perioperative screening for metastatic disease is not indicated in patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical signs of tumor spread. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82(1):29–37
5. Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol 30(14):1715–1724
6. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer (version 2.2015). National Comprehensive Cancer Network website. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed Mar 9 2015
7. Simos D, Hutton B, Clemons M (2015) Are physicians choosing wisely when imaging for distant metastases in women with operable breast cancer? J Oncol Pract 11(1):62–68
8. Crivello ML, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER et al (2013) Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population. Ann Surg Oncol 20(1):102–110
9. Han D, Hogeveen S, Sweet Goldstein M et al (2012) Is knowledge translation adequate? A quality assurance study of staging investigations in early stage breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(1):1–7
10. James JJ, McMahon MA, Tennant SL, Cornford EJ (2012) CT staging for breast cancer patients with poor prognostic tumours. Breast 21(6):735–738
11. Morris PG, O’Connor M, O’Rafferty C et al (2009) The excessive cost of baseline diagnostic imaging in early breast cancer. Ir Med J 102(5):149–152
12. Yeh KA, Fortunato L, Ridge JA, Hoffman JP, Eisenberg BL, Sigurdson ER (1995) Routine bone scanning in patients with T1 and T2 breast cancer: a waste of money. Ann Surg Oncol 2(4):319–324
13. Truong MT, Ko JP, Rossi SE et al (2014) Update in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiographics 34(6):1658–1679
14. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: a Statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400
15. Lee B, Lim A, Lalvani A et al (2008) The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19(12):2001–2006
16. Hahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS et al (2015) Use of imaging for staging of early-stage breast cancer in two integrated health care systems: adherence with a choosing wisely recommendation. J Oncol Pract. 11(3):e320–e328
17. Ramsey SD, Henry NL, Gralow JR et al (2015) Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 33(2):149–155
18. Brennan ME, Houssami N (2012) Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast 21(2):112–123
19. Brennan M, Houssami N (2012) Newly diagnosed early breast cancer—an update on pre-operative assessment and staging. Aust Fam Physician 41(11):871–874
20. Daglar G, Yuksek YN, Gozalan U, Tutuncu T, Kama NA (2010) The significance of pulmonary nodule in breast cancer patients. Bratisl Lek Listy 111(5):280–283
21. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 24(31):5091–5097
22. Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Chang P, Singh H (2015) Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists’ recommendations. J Am College Radiol 12(4):385–389
23. Blagev DP, Lloyd JF, Conner K et al (2014) Follow-up of incidental pulmonary nodules and the radiology report. J Am College Radiol 11(4):378–383
24. Dutta S, Long WJ, Brown DF, Reisner AT (2013) Automated detection using natural language processing of radiologists recommendations for additional imaging of incidental findings. Ann Emerg Med 62(2):162–169