Learning recursive segments for discourse parsing

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3578-3584

  Afantenos, Stergos ^a   Denis, Pascal ^b   Muller, Philippe ^a,b   Danlos, Laurence ^b  

^a IRIT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE PARSING; DISCOURSE SEGMENTATION; F-SCORE; GLOBAL COHERENCE; LINEAR SEQUENCE; MULTI-CLASS CLASSIFICATION; SIMPLE APPROACH;

EID: 84955711494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. N. Asher. 1993. Reference to AbstractObjects in Discourse. Kluwer.
2. J. Baldridge, N. Asher, and J. Hunter. 2007. Annotation for and robust parsing of discourse structure on unrestricted texts. Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft, 26:213-239.
3. A. Berger, S. Della Pietra, and V. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
4. D. Bourigault, C. Fabre, C. Frérot, M.-P. Jacques, and S. Ozdowska. 2005. Syntex, analyseur syntaxique de corpus. In Actes des 12èmes journées sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles.
5. Lynn Carlson, Daniel Marcu, and Mary Ellen Okurowski. 2003. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In Jan van Kuppevelt and Ronnie Smith, editors, Current Directions in Discourse and Dialogue, pages 85-112. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Xavier Carreras and Luís Màrquez. 2001. Boosting trees for clause splitting. In Walter Daele-mans and Rémi Zajac, editors, Proceedings of CoNLL-2001, pages 73-75. Toulouse, France.
7. Eva Ejerhed. 1996. Finite state segmentation of discourse into clauses. In Proceedings of the ECAI '96 Workshop on Extended finite state models of language, Budapest.
8. Seeger Fisher and Brian Roark. 2007. The utility of parse-derived features for automatic discourse segmentation. In ACL.
9. Robert Malouf. 2002. A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Natural Language Learning, pages 49-55, Taipei, Taiwan.
10. W. Mann and S. Thompson. 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: a theory of text organization. Technical report, Information Science Institute.
11. Daniel Marcu. 2000. The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: a surface-based approach. 26(3):395-448.
12. Alexis Nasr and Alexandra Volanschi, 2006. Finite-State Methods and Natural Language Processing, Volume 4002 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter Integrating a Part of Speech Tagger and a Chunker Implemented as Weighted Finite-State Machines, pages 167-178. Springer.
13. Rashmi Prasad, Eleni Miltsakaki, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber. 2004. Annotation and data mining of the penn discourse treebank. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, Spain.
14. Radu Soricut and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. In HLT/NAACL, Edmonton, Canada.
15. Caroline Sporleder and Mirella Lapata. 2005. Discourse chunking and its application to sentence compression. In HLT/EMNLP.
16. Milan Tofiloski, Julian Brooke, and Maite Taboada. 2009. A syntactic and lexical-based discourse segmenter. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 77-80, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Bonnie L. Webber. 2004. D-ltag: extending lex-icalized tag to discourse. Cognitive Science, 28(5):751-779.