Engineering cellulose nanofibre suspensions to control filtration resistance and sheet permeability

Cellulose

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 391-402

  Li, Qing ^a   Raj, Praveena ^a   Husain, Fatema Abbas ^a   Varanasi, Swambabu ^a   Rainey, Tom ^b   Garnier, Gil ^a   Batchelor, Warren ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofibre; CPAM; Dewatering; Gel point; PEI; Permeability; Polyelectrolyte

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; DEWATERING; FILTRATION; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFIBERS; POLYELECTROLYTES; POLYETHERIMIDES;

CATIONIC POLYACRYLAMIDES; CPAM; FLOCCULATED SUSPENSIONS; GEL POINT; HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; SHEET FORMING PROCESS; SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS;

SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

EID: 84955677264     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: 1572882X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0790-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ek M, Gellerstedt G, Henriksson G (2009) Paper products physics and technology. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
2. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2008) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10(1):162–165. doi:10.1021/bm801065u
3. Hubbe MA, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ (2007) Review of factors affecting the release of water from cellulosic fibers during paper manufacturer. BioResources 2(3):500–533
4. Landman KA, White LR, Buscall R (1988) The continuous-flow gravity thickener: steady state behavior. AIChE J 34(2):239–252. doi:10.1002/aic.690340208
5. Lowys M-P, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M (2000) Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives. Food Hydrocoll 15:25–32
6. Lu J, Askeland P, Drzal LT (2008) Surface modification of microfibrillated cellulose for epoxy composite applications. Polymer 49(5):1285–1296. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.028
7. Martinez DM, Buckley K, Jivan S, Lindstrom A, Thiruvengadaswamy R, Olson JA, Ruth TJ, Kerekes RJ (2001) Characterizing the mobility of papermaking fibres during sedimentation. In: 12th fundamental research symposium. The science of papermaking, pp 225–254
8. Mosse WKJ, Boger DV, Simon GP, Garnier G (2012) Effect of cationic polyacrylamides on the interactions between cellulose fibers. Langmuir 28(7):3641–3649. doi:10.1021/la2049579
9. Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2005) Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure. Appl Phys A 80(1):155–159. doi:10.1007/s00339-003-2225-2
10. Nanko H, Pan S (2003) Visualization of polymer adsorption on pulp fiber: polyacrylamide. In: Proceedings of 2003 TAPPI spring technical conference, Chicago, IL
11. Nasser MS, James AE (2006) The effect of polyacrylamide charge density and molecular weight on the flocculation and sedimentation behaviour of kaolinite suspensions. Sep Purif Technol 52(2):241–252. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2006.04.005
12. Nasser MS, James AE (2007) Effect of polyacrylamide polymers on floc size and rheological behaviour of kaolinite suspensions. Colloids Surf, A 301(1–3):311–322. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.080
13. Rainey TJ, Doherty WOS, Martinez DM, Brown RJ, Dickson A (2010a) The effect of flocculants on the filtration of bagasse pulp pads. Tappi J, pp 7–14
14. Rainey TJ, Moghaddam L, Doherty WOS (2010b) The effect of flocculants, shear, vacuum and depithing on the formation of thin bagasse pulp pads. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 25(4):434–440. doi:10.3183/NPPRJ-2010-25-04-p434-440
15. Rainey T, Doherty WS, Martinez DM, Brown R, Kelson N (2011) Pressure filtration of Australian bagasse pulp. Transp Porous Med 86(3):737–751. doi:10.1007/s11242-010-9649-x
16. Raj P, Varanasi S, Batchelor W, Garnier G (2015) Effect of cationic polyacrylamide on the processing and properties of nanocellulose films. J Colloid Interface Sci 447:113–119. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.019
17. Sakurada I, Nukushina Y, Ito T (1962) Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers. J Polym Sci 57(165):651–660. doi:10.1002/pol.1962.1205716551
18. Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromolecules 11(9):2195–2198. doi:10.1021/bm100490s
19. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3):459–494. doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y
20. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16(1):75–85. doi:10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2
21. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci: Appl Polym Symp 37:815–827
22. Varanasi S, Batchelor W (2014) Superior non-woven sheet forming characteristics of low-density cationic polymer–cellulose nanofibre colloids. Cellulose 21(5):3541–3550. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0370-8
23. Varanasi S, He R, Batchelor W (2013) Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point. Cellulose 20(4):1885–1896. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-9972-9
24. Vesterinen A, Seppala J (2008) Rheological study of microfibrillar cellulose and dynamic mechanical analysis of paper sheet. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 16:259–262
25. Zhang L, Batchelor W, Varanasi S, Tsuzuki T, Wang X (2012) Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming through filtration. Cellulose 19(2):561–574. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9641-9
26. Zhu H, Fang Z, Preston C, Li Y, Hu L (2014) Transparent paper: fabrications, properties, and device applications. Energy Environ Sci. doi:10.1039/C3EE43024C