Valuing Antarctica: Emerging Views from International Studies

Antarctic Futures: Human Engagement with the Antarctic Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 233-252

  Neufeld, Erin ^a   O’reilly, Jessica ^b   Summerson, Rupert ^c   Tin, Tina ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d Independent Environmental Consultant   (France)

Author keywords

Antarctic values; Extrinsic values; Instrumental values; Intrinsic values; Wilderness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955647581     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6582-5_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Anderson, E.(1993). Value in ethics and economics.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. ASOC. (2006). Beyond direct impacts of multi-year maintained ice routes. Case study: McMurdo-South Polar surface re-supply traverse. Information paper 85 presented at XXIX Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 12-23 June 2006.
3. Barnes, J. N.(1982). Let’s save Antarctica. Richmond, Australia: Greenhouse Publications.
4. Barnes, J. N.(2011). The Antarctic treaty system: Perspectives of environmental nongovernmental organizations on addressing key issues. In P. A. Berkman, M. A. Lang, D. W. H. Walton, & O. R. Young (Eds.), Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science and the governance of international spaces (pp. 277-280). Washington D.C., USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
5. Bastmeijer, K.(2008), Protecting Polar Wilderness: Just a Western Philosophical Idea or a Useful Concept for Regulating Human Activities in the Polar Regions? Yearbook of Polar Law, 2008.Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295430.
6. Bastmeijer, C.J.(2011). Intergenerational Equity and the Antarctic Treaty System: Continued Efforts to Prevent ‘Mastery’ (February 15, 2011). Yearbook of Polar Law, Vol. 3, 2011. Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1762039.
7. Bastmeijer, C. J., &Roura, R.(2008). Environmental impact assessment in Antarctica. In C. J. Bastmeijer & T. Koivurova (Eds.), Theory and practice of trans boundary environmental impact assessment (pp. 175-219). Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
8. Beaglehole, J. C.(1974). The Life of Captain James Cook.London, UK: A&C Black Ltd.
9. Beck, P. J.(1986). The international politics of Antarctica.Kent, UK: Croom Helm Ltd.
10. Berkman, P. A.(2002). Science into policy: Global lessons from Antarctica. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
11. Berkman, P. A.(2010). Polar research, common interests in the international space of Antarctica. Polar Record, 46,7-9.
12. Bowden, T.(1997). The silence calling. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
13. Brady, A.-M.(2010). China’s rise in Antarctica?Asian Survey,50(4), 759-785.
14. Brady, A.-M.(2011). New Zealand’s strategic interests in Antarctica. Polar Record,47(241), 126-134.
15. Codling, R.(1997). Concepts of wilderness in the Antarctic. International Journal of Wilderness, 3(3), 35-39.
16. Codling, R.(1998). Wilderness and Aesthetic Values in Antarctica. (PhD thesis, Open University, UK).
17. Codling, R.(2001). Wilderness and aesthetic values in the Antarctic. Polar Record,37(203), 337-352.
18. Cordell, H. K., Tarrant, M. A., &Green, G. T.(2003). Is the public viewpoint of wilderness shifting?International Journal of Wilderness,9(2), 27-32.
19. Daniel, T.C., &Boster, R.S.(1976). Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Paper RM-167, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
20. del Acebo Ibanez, E., &Costa, M.(2010). Antarctic environmental problems: attitudes and behaviours of young inhabitants of two Argentine cities (Buenos Aires and San Carlos de Bariloche). Polar Record,46(238), 257-263.
21. Dodds, K. J.(2010). Governing Antarctica: Contemporary challenges and the enduring legacy of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. Global Policy,1(1), 108-115.
22. Dodds, K. J.(2011). Sovereignty watch: claimant states, resources, and territory in contemporary Antarctica. Polar Record, 47,231-243.
23. Esbjörn-Hargens, S. and Zimmerman, M.E.(2009). An overview of integral ecology: a comprehensive approach to today’s complex planetary issues.Integral Institute, Resource Paper no. 2.
24. x interaction. Nature, 315,207-210.
25. Fogg, G. E.(1992). A history of Antarctic science.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Fox, A. J., &Cooper, A. P. R.(1994). Measured properties of the Antarctic ice sheet derived from the SCAR Antarctic digital database. Polar Record, 30,201-206.
27. Graeber, D.(2001). Towards an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams.New York: Palgrave.
28. Gurney, A.(1997). Below the convergence. New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.
29. Hemmings, A.D.(2007). Globalization’s cold genius and the ending of Antarctic isolation. In: L.K. Kriwoken, J. Jabour, J. & A.D. Hemmings (Eds.), Looking south: Australia’s Antarctic Agenda (pp. 176-190). Leichhardt, NSW, Australia: The Federation Press.
30. Hemmings, A. D.(2009). From the New Geopolitics of resources to nanotechnology: Emerging challenges of globalism in Antarctica. In D. Leary, T. Koivurova, & G. Alfredsson (Eds.), Yearbook of Polar Law (Vol. 1, pp. 55-72). Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
31. Hemmings, A.D. (2010). Considerable Norms in the Antarctic. Paper presented at Antarctic Visions: Cultural Perspectives on the Southern Continent. University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 21-23 June, 2010.
32. Hughes, K. A., Fretwell, P., Rae, J., Holmes, K., &Fleming, A.(2011). Untouched Antarctica: Mapping a finite and diminishing environmental resource. Antarctic Science,23(6), 537-548.
33. Ingelhart, R., &Welzel, C.(2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Karp, D. G.(1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behaviour. Environment and Behaviour,29(1), 111-133.
35. Kluckhohn, C.(1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Towards a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Korsgaard, C. M.(1983). Two distinctions in goodness. The philosophical review, 92(2), 169-195.
37. Lamers, M., Liggett, D.&Tin, T.(2013). Strategic thinking for the Antarctic environment: The use of assessment tools in governance. In T. Tin, D. Liggett, P. T. Maher & M. Lamers (Eds.), Antarctic futures: Human Engagement with the Antarctic environment (p. 30). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
38. Lee, K.(1999). The natural and the artefactual: The implications of deep science and deep technology for environmental philosophy. Lanham, MD, USA: Lexington Books.
39. Lee, K.(2006). Biotic and abiotic nature: how radical is Rolston’s environmental philosophy?In Preston, C. J., & Ouderkirk, W. (Eds.), Nature, Value, Duty. Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston III. (pp. 17-28). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
40. Liggett, D.(2011). Antarctica—Economy. In: Australia and Antarctica, Volume 10—The World and Its Peoples (pp. 1430-1433). Tarrytown, New York: Marshall Cavendish Corporation.
41. Lovering, J. F., &Prescott, J. R. V.(1979). Last of lands…Antarctica. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
42. Maher, P. T. (2007). Advocating for Antarctic wilderness: short-term visits and human values. In A. Watson, J. Sproull & L. Dean (Comps.), Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress symposium: September 30-October 6, 2005: Anchorage, AK (pp. 170-177). Proceedings RMRS-P-49. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
43. McShane, K.(2007). Why environmental ethics shouldn’t give up on intrinsic value. Environmental Ethics, 29,43-61.
44. Morito, B.(2003). Intrinsic value: A modern albatross for the ecological approach. Environmental Values,12(3), 317-336.
45. New Zealand (1999). Towards additional protection of Antarctic wilderness areas. Information Paper 80 presented at XXXIII Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Lima, Peru, 24 May-4 June 1999.
46. New Zealand. (2011). Understanding concepts of footprint and wilderness related to the protection of the Antarctic environment. Working Paper 35 presented at XXXIV Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 20 June-1 July 2011.
47. O’Neill, J., Holland, A., &Light, A.(2008). Environmental values.London, UK: Routledge.
48. O’Neill, J.(1992). The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist,75(2), 119-133.
49. Orheim, O., Press, A., &Gilbert, N.(2011). Managing the Antarctic environment: The evolving role of the committee for environmental protection. In P. A. Berkman, M. A. Lang, D. W. H. Walton, & O. R. Young (Eds.), Science diplomacy: Antarctica, science and the governance of international spaces (pp. 209-222). Washington D.C., USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
50. Rescher, N.(1982). Introduction to value theory. Washington, D.C., USA: University Press of America.
51. Rokeach, M.(1973). The nature of human values. New York, USA: Free Press.
52. Rolston, H., III. (2002). Environmental ethics in Antarctica. Environmental Ethics, 24,115-134.
53. Rolston, H, III. (2006). Living on Earth: Dialogue and dialectic with my critics. In C.J. Preston & W. Ouderkirk (Eds.), Nature, Value, Duty. Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston III (pp. 237-268). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
54. Rolston, H., III. (2009). Antarctica. In J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy (Vol. I, pp. 53-58). Detroit, USA: Macmillan Reference.
55. Rothwell, D.(2010). Sovereignty and the Antarctic treaty. Polar Record, 46,17-20.
56. Roura, R., &Hemmings, A. D.(2011). Realising strategic environmental assessment in Antarctica. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(3),483-514.
57. Sanchez, R. A., &McIvor, E.(2007). The Antarctic committee for environmental protection: Past, present, and future. Polar Record, 43(226), 239-246.
58. SCAR SSAG. (2010). Social Sciences Action Group—Values in Antarctica: Human connections to a continent. Draft Report retrieved from http://www.scar.org/researchgroups/via/SocialSci encesAG_Rept_2010.pdf.
59. Schwartz, S. H.(1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10,221-279.
60. Schwartz, S. H.(1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York, USA: Academic Press.
61. Schwartz, S.(1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues,50(4), 19-45.
62. Spates, J.(1983). The sociology of values. Annual Review of Sociology, 9,27-49.
63. Spiller, J.(2004). Re-imagining United States Antarctic research as a defining endeavour of a deserving world leader: 1957-1991. Public Understanding of Science, 13,31-53.
64. Summerson, R.(2012). Protection of wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. In F. Huettmann (Ed.), Protection of the three poles (pp. 77-112). Tokyo, Japan: Springer.
65. Summerson, R., &Bishop, I. D.(2011). Aesthetic value in Antarctica: Beautiful or sublime?The Polar Journal,1(2), 225-250.
66. Summerson, R., &Riddle, M. J.(2000). Assessing wilderness and aesthetic values in Antarctica. In W. Davison, C. Howard-Williams, & P. Broady (Eds.), Antarctic Ecosystems: Models for wider understanding (pp. 303-307). Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury.
67. Thomas, A.(1998). Values. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 9, pp. 581-583). London, UK: Routledge.
68. Tin, T., Hemmings, A. D., &Roura, R.(2008). Pressures on the wilderness values of the Antarctic continent. International Journal of Wilderness,14(3), 7-12.
69. Tin, T., Bastmeijer, C.J., O’reilly, J. & Maher, P. T. (2011). Public perception of the Antarctic wilderness: surveys from an educated, environmentally knowledgeable European community. In A. Watson, J. Murrieta-Saldviar & B. McBride (Comps.) Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Ninth World Wilderness Congress symposium. 6-13 November, 2009, Mérida, Mexico. (pp. 109-117). Proceedings RMRS-P-00. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
70. T0nnessen, J. N., &Johnsen, A. O.(1982). The history of modern whaling. Canberra, Australia: Hurst.
71. Vigni, P.(2000). The interaction between the Antarctic treaty system and the other relevant conventions applicable to the Antarctic area: A practical approach versus theoretical doctrines. In J. A. Frowein & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), Max Planck year book of United Nations Law (pp. 481-542). Leiden, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
72. Williams, D.R. & Watson, A.E. (2007). Wilderness values: perspectives from non-economic social science. In A. Watson, J. Sproull & L. Dean (Comps.), Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress symposium: September 30-October 6, 2005: Anchorage, AK (pp. 123-133). Proceedings RMRS-P-49. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
73. Zimmerman, M. J.(2001). The nature of intrinsic value. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman and Littlefield.