A time series interaction analysis method for building predictive models of learners using log data

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 16-20-March-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 126-135

  Brooks, Christopher ^a   Thompson, Craig ^b   Teasley, Stephanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; EDUCATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

COGNITIVE MODELLING; CONTENT ANALYSIS; INTERACTION ANALYSIS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; LEARNING PROCESS; MASSIVE OPEN ONLINE COURSE; PREDICTIVE MODELS; STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84955609776     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2723576.2723581     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. G. Altman. Practical statistics for medical research. CRC Press, 1990.
2. J. Anderson. Rules of the mind. 1993.
3. R. Barber and M. Sharkey. Course correction: using analytics to predict course success. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pages 259-262. ACM, 2012.
4. B. S. Bloom, M. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook i: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay, 19:56, 1956.
5. C. A. Brooks and J. E. Greer. Explaining predictive models to learning specialists using personas. In 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2012 (LAK'14), pages 26-30, 2014.
6. S. Bull, J. Greer, G. McCalla, L. Kettel, and J. Bowes. User modelling in i-help: What, why, when and how. In User Modeling 2001, pages 117-126. Springer, 2001.
7. Carnegie Learning. The Cognitive Tutor: Applying Cognitive Science to Education. Technical report, Carnegie Learning, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1998.
8. N. V. Chawla. C4.5 and imbalanced data sets: investigating the effect of sampling method, probabilistic estimate, and decision tree structure. In Proceedings of the ICML, volume 3, 2003.
9. J. L. Fleiss. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5):378-382, 1971.
10. J. L. Fleiss, B. Levin, and M. C. Paik. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
11. K. J. Gergen. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American psychologist, 40(3):266, 1985.
12. A. C. Graesser, P. Chipman, B. C. Haynes, and A. Olney. Autotutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 48(4):612-618, 2005.
13. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, 11(1):10-18, 2009.
14. S. M. Jayaprakash, E. W. Moody, E. J. Lauria, J. R. Regan, and J. D. Baron. Early alert of academically at-risk students: An open source analytics initiative. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(1):6-47, 2014.
15. J. R. Landis, G. G. Koch, et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 33(1):159-174, 1977.
16. B. Martin. Constraint-based modelling: Representing student knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Computing, 7(2):30-38, 1999.
17. S. Ohlsson. Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103(2):241-262, 1996.
18. L. Perna, A. Ruby, R. Boruch, N. Wang, J. Scull, C. Evans, and S. Ahmad. The life cycle of a million mooc users. In Presentation at the MOOC Research Initiative Conference, 2013.
19. Q. Xie. Agree or disagree? a demonstration of an alternative statistic to cohen's kappa for measuring the extent and reliability of agreement between observers. 2013.