Impact of rail pressure and biodiesel fueling on the particulate morphology and soot nanostructures from a common-rail turbocharged direct injection diesel engine

International Journal of Engine Research

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 193-208

  Ye, Peng ^a,b   Sun, Chenxi ^a,c   Lapuerta, Magin ^d   Agudelo, John ^e   Vander Wal, Randy ^a   Boehman, Andre L ^a,c   Toops, Todd J ^f   Daw, Stuart ^f  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HESS CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^f OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; fractal dimension; morphology; nanostructure; oxidative reactivity; soot

Indexed keywords

BIODIESEL; DIESEL ENGINES; ENGINES; FRACTAL DIMENSION; FUELING; MORPHOLOGY; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; SOOT; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINES; EXHAUST PARTICULATES; OXIDATIVE REACTIVITY; PARTICULATE MORPHOLOGY; PRIMARY PARTICLE SIZE; SCANNING MOBILITY PARTICLE SIZINGS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRONIC MICROSCOPIES; ULTRA-LOW SULFUR DIESEL;

DIRECT INJECTION;

EID: 84955449341     PISSN: 14680874     EISSN: 20413149     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468087414564229     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Kittelson D,. Engines and nanoparticles: a review. J Aerosol Sci 1998; 29 (5-6): 575-588.
2. Lapuerta M, Ballesteros R, Martos FJ,. A method to determine the fractal dimension of diesel soot agglomerates. J Colloid Interf Sci 2006; 303 (1): 149-158.
3. Lapuerta M, Hernández JJ, Ballesteros R, Durán A,. Composition and size of diesel particulate emissions from a commercial European engine tested with present and future fuels. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2003; 217 (10): 907-919.
4. Franklin RE,. Crystallite growth in graphitizing and non-graphitizing carbons. P Roy Soc Lond A Mat 1951; 209 (1097): 196-218.
5. Marsh H,. Introduction to carbon science. London: Butterworths, 1989, pp. 107-152.
6. Smith DM, Chughtai AR,. The surface-structure and reactivity of black carbon. Colloid Surface A 1995; 105 (1): 47-77.
7. Lee KO, Zhu J, Ciatti S, Yozgatligil A, Choi MY,. Sizes, graphitic structures and fractal geometry of light-duty diesel engine particulates. SAE technical paper 2003-01-3169, 2003.
8. Mandelbrot B,. The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1982.
9. Lapuerta M, Ballesteros R, Martos FJ,. The effect of diesel engine conditions on the size and morphology of soot particles. Int J Vehicle Des 2009; 50 (1-4): 91-106.
10. Koylu UO, Faeth GM, Farias TL, Carvalho MG,. Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates. Combust Flame 1995; 100 (4): 621-633.
11. Lee KO, Cole R, Sekar R, Choi MY, Kang JS, Bae CS, Shin HD,. Morphological investigation of the microstructure, dimensions, and fractal geometry of diesel particulates. P Combust Inst 2002; 29: 647-653.
12. Li Z, Song C, Song J, Lv G, Dong S, Zhao Z,. Evolution of the nanostructure, fractal dimension and size of in-cylinder soot during diesel combustion process. Combust Flame 2011; 158 (8): 1624-1630.
13. Armas O, Yehliu K, Boehman AL,. Effect of alternative fuels on exhaust emissions during diesel engine operation with matched combustion phasing. Fuel 2010; 89 (2): 438-456.
14. Müller J-O, Su DS, Jentoft RE, Kröhnert J, Jentoft FC, Schlögl R,. Morphology-controlled reactivity of carbonaceous materials towards oxidation. Catal Today 2005; 102: 259-265.
15. Strzelec A, Toops TJ, Daw CS, Foster D, Rutland C,. ULSD and biodiesel particulate oxidation model: combined effects of volatiles and fixed carbon combustion. SAE technical paper 2010-01-2127, 2010.
16. Strzelec A, Toops TJ, Daw CS,. Oxygen reactivity of devolatilized diesel particulates from conventional and biodiesel fuels. Energ Fuel 2013; 27: 3944-3951.
17. Vander Wal RL, Strzelec A, Toops TJ, Daw CS, Genzale CL,. Forensics of soot: C5-related nanostructure as a diagnostic of in-cylinder chemistry. Fuel 2013; 113: 522-526.
18. Vander Wal RL, Mueller CJ,. Initial investigation of effects of fuel oxygenation on nanostructure of soot from a direct-injection diesel engine. Energ Fuel 2006; 20 (6): 2364-2369.
19. Bagley ST, Gratz LD, Johnson JH, McDonald JF,. Effects of an oxidation catalytic converter and a biodiesel fuel on the chemical, mutagenic, and particle size characteristics of emissions from a diesel engine. Environ Sci Technol 1998; 32 (9): 1183-1191.
20. Tsolakis A,. Effects on particle size distribution from the diesel engine operating on RME-biodiesel with EGR. Energ Fuel 2006; 20 (4): 1418-1424.
21. Neer A, Koylu UO,. Effect of operating conditions on the size, morphology, and concentration of submicrometer particulates emitted from a diesel engine. Combust Flame 2006; 146 (1-2): 142-154.
22. Soewono A, Rogak S,. Morphology and Raman spectra of engine-emitted particulates. Aerosol Sci Tech 2011; 45 (10): 1206-1216.
23. Mathis U, Mohr M, Kaegi R, Bertola A, Boulouchos K,. Influence of diesel engine combustion parameters on primary soot particle diameter. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39 (6): 1887-1892.
24. Braun A, Huggins FE, Shah N, Chen Y, Wirick S, Mun SB, et al. Advantages of soft X-ray absorption over TEM-EELS for solid carbon studies-a comparative study on diesel soot with EELS and NEXAFS. Carbon 2005; 43 (1): 117-124.
25. Al-Qurashi K, Boehman AL,. Impact of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on the oxidative reactivity of diesel engine soot. Combust Flame 2008; 155 (4): 675-695.
26. Lapuerta M, Martos FJ, Herreros JM,. Effect of engine operating conditions on the size of primary particles composing diesel soot agglomerates. J Aerosol Sci 2007; 38 (4): 455-466.
27. Zhu J, Lee KO, Yozgatligil A, Choi MY,. Effects of engine operating conditions on morphology, microstructure, and fractal geometry of light-duty diesel engine particulates. P Combust Inst 2005; 30 (2): 2781-2789.
28. Smekens A, Moreton Godoi RH, Berghmans P, Van Grieken R,. Characterisation of soot emitted by domestic heating, aircraft and cars using diesel or biodiesel. J Atmos Chem 2005; 52 (1): 45-62.
29. Boehman A, Song J, Alam M,. Impact of biodiesel blending on diesel soot and the regeneration of particulate filters. Energ Fuel 2005; 19 (5): 1857-1864.
30. Song J, Alam M, Boehman AL, Kim U,. Examination of the oxidation behavior of biodiesel soot. Combust Flame 2006; 146 (4): 589-604.
31. Lapuerta M, Oliva F, Agudelo JR, Boehman AL,. Effect of fuel on the soot nanostructure and consequences on loading and regeneration of diesel particulate filters. Combust Flame 2012; 159: 844-853.
32. Maricq MM,. Physical and chemical comparison of soot in hydrocarbon and biodiesel fuel diffusion flames: a study of model and commercial fuels. Combust Flame 2011; 158 (1): 105-116.
33. Yehliu K, Vander Wal RL, Armas O, Boehman AL,. Impact of fuel formulation on the nanostructure and reactivity of diesel soot. Combust Flame 2012; 159: 3597-3606.
34. Yehliu K, Armas O, Vander Wal RL, Boehman AL,. Impact of engine operating modes and combustion phasing on the reactivity of diesel soot. Combust Flame 2013; 160: 682-691.
35. Yehliu K, Vander Wal RL, Boehman AL,. Development of an HRTEM image analysis method to quantify carbon nanostructure. Combust Flame 2011; 158 (9): 1837-1851.
36. Seong HJ, Boehman AL,. Impact of intake oxygen enrichment on oxidative reactivity and properties of diesel soot. Energ Fuel 2011; 25: 602-616.
37. Agudelo JR, Álvarez A, Armas O,. Impact of crude vegetable oils on the oxidation reactivity and nanostructure of diesel particulate matter. Combust Flame 2014; 161: 2904-2915.
38. Sadezky A, Muckenhuber H, Grothe H, Niessner R, Pöschl U,. Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials: spectral analysis and structural information. Carbon 2005; 43 (8): 1731-1742.
39. Ferrari AC, Robertson J,. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys Rev B 2000; 61 (20): 14095-14107.
40. Jawhari T, Roid A, Casado J,. Raman-spectroscopic characterization of some commercially available carbon-black materials. Carbon 1995; 33 (11): 1561-1565.
41. Seong HJ,. Impact of oxygen enrichment on soot properties and soot oxidative reactivity. PhD Thesis, Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 2010.
42. Meakin P, Donn B, Mulholland GW,. Collisions between point masses and fractal aggregates. Langmuir 1989; 5 (2): 510-518.
43. Mikhailov EF, Masenko SS, Kiselev AA, Ryshkevitch TI,. Restructuring of soot particles: experimental study. J Aerosol Sci 1996; 27: 711-712.
44. Sun J, Caton JA, Jacobs TJ,. Oxides of nitrogen emissions from biodiesel-fuelled diesel engines. Prog Energ Combust 2010; 36 (6): 677-695.
45. Tzamkiozis T, Ntziachristos L, Mamakos A, Fontaras G, Samaras Z,. Aerodynamic and mobility size distribution measurements to reveal biodiesel effects on diesel exhaust aerosol. Aerosol Sci Tech 2011; 45 (5): 587-595.
46. Song JH, Alam M, Boehman AL,. Impact of alternative fuels on soot properties and DPF regeneration. Combust Sci Technol 2007; 179 (9): 1991-2037.
47. Vander Wal RL, Tomasek AJ,. Soot nanostructure: dependence upon synthesis conditions. Combust Flame 2004; 136 (1-2): 129-140.
48. Vander Wal RL, Tomasek AJ,. Soot oxidation: dependence upon initial nanostructure. Combust Flame 2003; 134 (1-2): 1-9.
49. Gülder ÖL,. Soot formation in laminar diffusion flames at elevated temperatures. Combust Flame 1992; 88 (1): 75-82.
50. Kumfer BM, Skeen SA, Chen R, Axelbaum RL,. Measurement and analysis of soot inception limits of oxygen-enriched coflow flames. Combust Flame 2006; 147 (3): 233-242.
51. Du DX, Axelbaum RL, Law CK,. Soot formation in strained diffusion flames with gaseous additives. Combust Flame 1995; 102 (1-2): 11-20.
52. Hurt RH, Crawford GP, Shim H-S,. Equilibrium nanostructure of primary soot particles. P Combust Inst 2000; 28 (2): 2539-2546.
53. Chen HX, Dobbins RA,. Crystallogenesis of particles formed in hydrocarbon combustion. Combust Sci Technol 2000; 159: 109-128.
54. Vander Wal RL,. A TEM methodology for the study of soot particle structure. Combust Sci Technol 1997; 126: 333-357.
55. Song JH,. Effect of fuel formulation on soot properties and regeneration of diesel particulate filters. PhD Thesis, Fuel Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 2005.
56. Radovic LR, Walker PL, Jenkins RG,. Importance of carbon active-sites in the gasification of coal chars. Fuel 1983; 62 (7): 849-856.
57. Jenkins RG, Nandi SP, Walker PL,. Reactivity of heat-treated coals in air at 500 degrees C. Fuel 1973; 52 (4): 288-293.
58. Al-Qurashi K, Lueking AD, Boehman AL,. The deconvolution of the thermal, dilution, and chemical effects of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on the reactivity of engine and flame soot. Combust Flame 2011; 158 (9): 1696-1704.
59. Arenillas A, Rubiera F, Pevida C, Ania CO, Pis JJ,. Relationship between structure and reactivity of carbonaceous materials. J Therm Anal Calorim 2004; 76 (2): 593-602.
60. Cheng A, Harriott P,. Kinetics of oxidation and chemisorption of oxygen for porous carbons with high surface-area. Carbon 1986; 24 (2): 143-150.
61. Gilot P, Bonnefoy F, Marcuccilli F, Prado G,. Determination of kinetic data for soot oxidation-modeling of competition between oxygen diffusion and reaction during thermogravimetric analysis. Combust Flame 1993; 95 (1-2): 87-100.
62. Boehman AL, Song J, Jeon CH,. Impacts of oxygen diffusion on the combustion rate of in-bed soot particles. Energ Fuel 2010; 24: 2418-2428.
63. Laine NR, Vastola FJ, Walker PL,. The importance of active surface area in carbon oxygen reaction. J Phys Chem: US 1963; 67 (10): 1461-1475.