Treatment decisions based on scalar and functional baseline covariates

Biometrics

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 884-894

  Ciarleglio, Adam ^a   Petkova, Eva ^a,b   Ogden, R Todd ^c   Tarpey, Thaddeus ^d  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c Department of Medicine   (United States)

^d WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advantage learning; Depression; Electroencephalography data; Functional data; Personalized medicine; Treatment regime

Indexed keywords

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT TREATMENT;

ADVANTAGE LEARNING; BASELINE DATA; COVARIATES; DECISION-BASED; DEPRESSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY DATA; FUNCTIONAL DATAS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT REGIME;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

BASELINE CONDITIONS; BIOMETRY; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE TREATMENT; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LEARNING; MENTAL HEALTH; RESONANCE;

BIOMETRY; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION THEORY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIOMETRY; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION THEORY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PRECISION MEDICINE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84955389618     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/biom.12346     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blatt, D., Murphy, S., and Zhu, J. (2004). A-learning for approximate planning. Technical Report 04-63, The Methodology Center, Penn. State University.
2. Bruder, G., Sedoruk, J., Stewart, J., McGrath, P., Quitkin, F., and Tenke, C. (2008). Electroencepholographic alpha measures predict theraputic response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressent: Pre and post-treatment findings. Biological Psychiatry 63, 1171-1177.
3. Chakraborty, B., Murphy, S., and Strecher, V. (2009). Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 19, 317-343.
4. Crainiceanu, C., Reiss, P., Goldsmith, J., Huang, L., Huo, L., Scheipl, F., Swihart, B., Greven, S., Harezlak, J., Kundu, M., Zhao, Y., McLean, M., and Xiao, L. (2014). refund: Regression with functional data. R Package version 0.1-11.
5. Gaynes, B., Warden, D., Trivedi, M., Wisniewski, S., Fava, M., and Rush, A. (2009). What did STAR*D teach us? results from a large-scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression. Psychiatric Services 60, 1439-1445.
6. Goldsmith, J., Bobb, J., Crainiceanu, C., and Reich, D. (2011). Penalized functional regression. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 20, 830-851.
7. Holtzheimer, P. and Mayberg, H. (2011). Stuckinarut: Rethinking depression and its treatment. Trends in Neurosciences 34, 1-9.
8. James, G. and Silvermam, B. (2005). Functional adaptive model estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, 565-576.
9. Laber, E., Lizotte, D., Qian, M., Pelham, W., and Murphy, S. (2014). Dynamic treatment regimes: Technical challenges and applications. Electronic Journal of Statistics 8, 1225-1272.
10. Lu, W., Zhang, H., and Zeng, D. (2013). Variable selection for optimal treatment decision. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 22, 493-504.
11. McGrath, C., Kelley, M., Holtzheimer III, P., Dunlop, B., Craighead, W., Franco, A., Craddock, R., and Mayberg, H. (2013). Toward a neuroimaging treatment selection biomarker for major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 821-829.
12. McKeague, I. and Qian, M. (2014). Estimation of treatment policies based on functional predictors. Statistica Sinica 24, 1461-1485.
13. Moodie, E. and Richardson, T. (2010). Estimating optimal dynamic regimes: Correcting bias under the null. The Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 37
14. Murphy, S. (2003). Optimal dynamic treatment regimes (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 65, 331-336.
15. Qian, M. and Murphy, S. (2011). Performance guarantees for individualized treatment rules. Annals of Statistics 39, 1180-1210.
16. Ramsay, J. O. and Silverman, B. W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis, Second Edition. Springer, New York.
17. Robins, J. (2004). Optimal structured nested models for optimal sequential decisions. In Proceedings of the Second Seattle Symposium on Biostatistics, D. Lin and P. Heagerty (eds), 189-326. Springer, New York.
18. Rubin, D. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 6, 34-58.
19. Schulte, P., Tsiatis, A., Laber, E., and Davidian, M. (2014). Q- and A-learning methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes. Statistical Science 29, 640-661.
20. Swihart, B., Goldsmith, J., and Crainiceanu, C. (2014). Restricted likelihood ratio tests for functional effects in the functional linear model. Technometrics 56, 483-493.
21. Tenke, C., Kayser, J., Manna, C., Fekri, S., Kroppmann, C., Schaller, J., Alschuler, D., Stewart, J., McGrath, P., and Bruder, G. (2011). Current source density measures of electroencepholographic alpha predict antidepressant treatment response. Biological Psychiatry 70, 388-394.
22. Zhang, B., Tsiatis, A., Laber, E., and Davidian, M. (2012). A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes. Biometrics 68, 1010-1018.
23. Zhao, Y., Kosorok, M., and Zeng, D. (2009). Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 28, 3294-3315.
24. Zhao, Y., Zeng, D., Rush, A., and Kosorok, M. (2012). Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning. Journal of the American Statistical Association 107, 1106-1118.