Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cornea

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 169-174

  Chen, Guohai ^a   Tzekov, Radouil ^b,c   Li, Wensheng ^d   Jiang, Fangzheng ^a   Mao, Sihong ^a   Tong, Yuhua ^a  

^a Quzhou People's Hospital   (China)

^b ROSKAMP INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; Meta analysis; Penetrating keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; KERATOPLASTY; META ANALYSIS; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REFRACTION ERROR; SAFETY; VISUAL ACUITY; CORNEA STROMA; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; CORNEAL DISEASES; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL STROMA; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84955352255     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000691     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Faran MF, Tabbara KF. Corneal dystrophies among patients undergoing keratoplasty in Saudi Arabia. Cornea. 1991;10:13-16.
2. Javadi MA, Motlagh BF, Jafarinasab MR, et al. Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Cornea. 2005;24:941-946.
3. Beckingsale P, Mavrikakis I, Al-Yousuf N, et al. Penetrating kerato-plasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:728-731.
4. Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, et al. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1396-1402.
5. Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Corneal endothelium and post-operative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:311-319.
6. Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty: a report by American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 209-218.
7. Shimazaki J. The evolution of lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11:217-223.
8. Silva CA, Schweitzer de Oliveira E, Souza de Sena Júnior MP, et al. Contrast sensitivity in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007;62:705-708.
9. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Srinivasan S, et al. Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:905-912.
10. Fogla R, Padmanabhan P. Results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:254-259.
11. Funnell CL, Ball J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoco-nus. Eye. 2006;20:527-532.
12. Liu H, Chen Y, Wang P, et al. Efficacy and safety of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0113332.
13. Keane M, Coster D, Ziaei M, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD009700.
14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6:e1000100.
15. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377-384.
16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
17. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088-1101.
18. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-634.
19. van den Biggelaar FJ, Cheng YY, Nuijts RM, et al. Economic evaluation of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in The Netherlands. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151:449-459.
20. Cheng YY, Visser N, Schouten JS, et al. Endothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:302-309.
21. Javadi MA, Feizi S, Yazdani S, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a clinical trial. Cornea. 2010;29:365-371.
22. Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:159-165.
23. Sogutlu Sari E, Kubaloglu A, Unal M, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for macular corneal dystrophy: a randomized trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:267-274.
24. Sögütlü Sari E, Kubaloglu A, Ünal M, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: comparsion of optical and visual quality outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:1063-1067.
25. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:398-403.
26. Acar BT, Vural ET, Acar S. Changes in endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar kerato-plasty. Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4:644-647.
27. Al-Torbak AA, Al-Motowa S, Al-Assiri A, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea. 2006;25:408-412.