Key Stakeholders' Perceptions of Motivators for Research Participation among Individuals Who Are Incarcerated

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 360-367

  Hanson, Bridget L ^a   Faulkner, Sherilyn A ^a   Brems, Christiane ^b   Corey, Staci L ^a   Eldridge, Gloria D ^a   Johnson, Mark E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

^b PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

correctional research; incarceration; motivations; qualitative research

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; ETHICIST; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; PERSONNEL; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRISON; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

COERCION; COMPREHENSION; ETHICISTS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; PRISONS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84955306173     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1556264615597500     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Alexander S. J., (2010). "As long as it helps somebody": Why vulnerable people participate in research. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 16, 173-178.
2. DuBois J. M., Beskow L., Campbell J., Dugosh K., Festinger D., Hartz S.,.Lidz C., (2012). Restoring balance: A consensus statement on the protection of vulnerable research participants. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2220-2225.
3. Eldridge G. D., Johnson M. E., Brems C., Corey S. L., (2011). Ethical challenges in conducting psychiatric or mental health research in correctional settings. American Journal of Bioethics Primary Research, 2, 42-51.
4. Eldridge G. D., Robinson R. V., Corey S., Brems C., Johnson M. E., (2012). Ethical challenges in conducting HIV/AIDS research in correctional settings. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 18, 309-318.
5. Elger B. S., (2008). Research involving prisoners: Consensus and controversies in international and European regulations. Bioethics, 22, 224-238.
6. Freudenberg N., (2007). Health research behind bars: A brief guide to research in jails and prisons. In Greifinger R. B., (Ed.), Public health behind bars: From prisons to communities (pp. 415-433). New York, NY: Springer.
7. Fry C., Dwyer R., (2001). For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction, 96, 1319-1325.
8. Gostin L. O., Vanchieri C., Pope A., (Eds.). (2007). Ethical considerations for research involving prisoners. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9. Hallowell N., Cooke S., Crawford G., Lucassen A., Parker M., Snowdon C., (2010). An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 37-45.
10. Kass N. E., Maman S., Atkinson J., (2005). Motivations, understanding, and voluntariness in international randomized trials. IRB, 27, 1-8.
11. Lowton K., (2005). Trials and tribulations: Understanding motivations for clinical research participation amongst adults with cystic fibrosis. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1854-1865.
12. Office for Human Research Protections. (2009). Protection of human subjects (45 CFR, Part 46). Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html
13. Sandelowski M., (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 179-183.
14. Springer S. A., Altice F. L., (2005). Managing HIV/AIDS in correctional settings. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2, 165-170.
15. Springer S. A., Bruce R. D., (2008). A pilot survey of attitudes and knowledge about opioid substitution therapy for HIV-infected prisoners. Journal of Opioid Management, 4, 81-86.
16. Strauss A., Corbin J. M., (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17. Warner T. D., Roberts L. W., Nguyen K., (2003). Do psychiatrists understand research-related experiences, attitudes, and motivations of schizophrenia study participants? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44, 227-233.