Patients' attitudes to risk in lung cancer surgery: A qualitative study

Lung Cancer

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 358-363

  Powell, H A ^a   Jones, L L ^b   Baldwin, D R ^a,c   Duffy, J P ^c   Hubbard, R B ^a   Tod, A M ^d   Tata, L J ^a   Solomon, J ^e   Bains, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lung neoplasm; Morbidity; Mortality; Qualitative Research; Risk; Thoracic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; LUNG CANCER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; AGED; ATTITUDE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LUNG SURGERY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PULMONARY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RISK;

EID: 84955281614     PISSN: 01695002     EISSN: 18728332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Powell H.A., Tata L.J., Baldwin D.R., Stanley R.A., Khakwani A., Hubbard R.B. Early mortality after surgical resection for lung cancer: an analysis of the english national lung cancer audit. Thorax 2013, 68(9):826-834.
2. Billmeier S.E., Ayanian J.Z., He Y.L., Jaklitsch M.T., Rogers S.O. PRedictors of nursing home admission, severe functional impairment, or death one year after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann. Surg. 2013, 257(3):555-563.
3. Goldstraw P., Crowley J., Chansky K., Giroux D.J., Groome P.A., Rami-Porta R., et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the tnm stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the tnm classification of malignant tumours. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2007, 2(8):706-714. 10. 1097/JTO. 0b013e31812f3c1a.
4. Ritchie J., Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers 2007, Sage publications, London.
5. Stenton C. The M.R.C. breathlessness scale. Occ. Med. 2008, 58(3):226-227.
6. Gale N.K., Heath G., Cameron E., Rashid S., Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2013, 13.
7. McNeil B.J., Weichselbaum R., Pauker S.G. Fallacy of 5-year survival in lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1978, 299(25):1397-1401.
8. Cykert S., Dilworth-Anderson P., Monroe M.H., Walker P., McGuire F.R., Corbie-Smith G., et al. Factors associated with decisions to undergo surgery among patients with newly diagnosed early-stage lung cancer. JAMA 2010, 303(23):2368-2376.
9. Lonsdale M., Hutchison G.L. Patients' desire for information about anaesthesia - Scottish and Canadian attitudes. Anaesthesia 1991, 46(5):410-412.
10. Degner L.F., Kristjanson L.J., Bowman D., Sloan J.A., Carriere K.C., Oneil J., et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 1997, 277(18):1485-1492.
11. Polit D.F., Beck C.T. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2010, 47(11):1451-1458.