Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1451-1458

  Polit, Denise F ^a,b   Beck, Cheryl Tatano ^c  

^a Humanalysis Inc   (United States)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Evidence based nursing; Generalization; Methods; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; MODEL; NURSING RESEARCH;

EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; MODELS, NURSING; NURSING RESEARCH;

EID: 77956188204     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Psychogical Association Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 2010, Author, Washington, DC. 6th ed.
2. Ayres L., Kavanagh K., Knafl K. Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research 2003, 13:871-883.
3. Borglin G., Richards D. Bias in experimental research: strategies to improve the quality and explanatory power of nursing science. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010, 47:123-128.
4. Campbell D.T. Relabeling internal and external validity for the applied social sciences. Advances in Quasi-Experimental Design and Analysis 1986, 67-77. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. W. Trochim (Ed.).
5. Cronbach L. Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 1975, 30:116-127.
6. Donmoyer R. Generalizability and the single-case study. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate 1990, 175-200. Teachers College Press, New York. E.W. Eisner, A. Peshkin (Eds.).
7. Eisner E.W. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice 1998, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
8. Erlandson D., Harris E., Skipper B., Allen S. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods 1993, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
9. Fahs P., Morgan L., Kalman M. A call for replication. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2003, 35:67-72.
10. Firestone W.A. Accommodation: toward a paradigm-praxis dialectic. The Paradigm Dialog 1990, 105-124. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. E. Guba (Ed.).
11. Firestone W.A. Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher 1993, 22:16-23.
12. Flemming K. Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: an example using critical interpretive synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010, 66(1):201-217.
13. Geertz C. Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. The Interpretation of Cultures 1973, Basic Books, New York. C. Geertz (Ed.).
14. Glaser B.G. Conceptualisation: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory. Social Science Theories and Adult Education Research 2002, 313-335. Lit Verlag, Munster. A. Bron, M. Schemmenn (Eds.).
15. Glasgow R.E. RE-AIMing research for application: ways to improve evidence for family medicine. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2006, 19:11-19.
16. Glasgow R.E., Magid D., Beck A., Ritzwoller D., Estabrooks P. Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Medical Care 2005, 43:551-557.
17. Greenwood D.J., Levin M. Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 2005, 43-64. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
18. Groleau D., Zelkowitz P., Cabral I. Enhancing generalizability: moving from an intimate to a political voice. Qualitative Health Research 2009, 19:416-426.
19. Guba E. Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluations 1978, University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, Los Angeles.
20. Kaplan A. The Conduct of Inquiry 1964, Chandler, Scranton, PA.
21. Kerlinger F.N., Lee H.B. Foundations of Behavioral Research 2000, Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX. 4th ed.
22. Lincoln Y., Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry 1985, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
23. Lincoln Y., Guba E. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. Naturalistic Evaluation 1986, 73-84. Jossey Bass, San Francisco. D. Willimas (Ed.).
24. Misco T. The frustrations of reader generalizability and grounded theory: alternative considerations for transferability. Journal of Research Practice 2007, 3:1-11.
25. Morse J.M., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2002, 1(2). Article 2. Retrieved January 7, 2010 from http://www.ualberta.ca/ijqm.
26. Patton M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
27. Plueye P., Gagnon M., Griffiths F., Johnson_Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009, 46:529-546.
28. Polit D.F. Statistics and Data Analysis for Nursing Research 2010, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
29. Polit D.F., Beck C.T. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice 2008, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. 8th ed.
30. Polit D.F., Beck C.T. International differences in nursing research, 2005-2006. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2009, 41:44-53.
31. Sandelowski M. " To be of use": enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nursing Outlook 1997, 45:125-132.
32. Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health 2000, 23:246-255.
33. Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health 2001, 24:230-240.
34. Schofield J.W. Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: The Continuing Debate 1990, 201-232. Teachers College Press, New York. E.W. Eisner, A. Peshkin (Eds.).
35. Schwandt T.A. Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms 1997, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. Shadish W., Cook T., Campbell D. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference 2002, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
37. Stake R.E. The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher 1978, 7:5-8.
38. Teddlie C., Tashakkori A. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
39. Thorne S. Interpretive Description 2008, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
40. Thorne S. The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: can metasynthesis be the answer. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009, 46:569-575.
41. Thorne S., Darbyshire P. Land mines in the field: a modest proposal for improving the craft of qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research 2005, 15:1105-1113.
42. Thorne S., Armstrong E., Harris S., Hislop T., Kim-Sung C., Oglov V., et al. Patient real-time and 12-month retrospective perceptions of difficult communications in the cancer diagnostic period. Qualitative Health Research 2009, 19:1383-1394.
43. Whittemore R., Melkus G., Wagner G., Dziura J., Northrup V., Grey M. Translating the diabetes prevention program to primary care. Nursing Research 2009, 58:2-12.