Prospective, multicenter, controlled study of quality of life, psychological adjustment process and medical outcomes of patients receiving a preemptive kidney transplant compared to a similar population of recipients after a dialysis period of less than three years - The PreKit-QoL study protocol

BMC Nephrology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Sébille, Véronique ^a,b   Hardouin, Jean Benoit ^a,b   Giral, Magali ^c   Bonnaud Antignac, Angélique ^a   Tessier, Philippe ^a   Papuchon, Emmanuelle ^c   Jobert, Alexandra ^b   Faurel Paul, Elodie ^b   Gentile, Stéphanie ^d,e   Cassuto, Elisabeth ^f   Morélon, Emmanuel ^g   Rostaing, Lionel ^h   Glotz, Denis ⁱ   Sberro Soussan, Rebecca ^j   Foucher, Yohann ^a   Meurette, Aurélie ^c  

^a Universite de Nantes   (France)

^b NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^e HÔPITAL DE LA CONCEPTION   (France)

^f PASTEUR HOSPITAL   (France)

^g EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^h CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

ⁱ SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

^j ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Dialysis; Item Response Theory; Nephrology; Preemptive; Quality of Life; Response shift; Structural Equation Modeling; Tansplantation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; END STAGE RENAL DISEASE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEALTH EDUCATION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL; COPING BEHAVIOR; HEMODIALYSIS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; METHODOLOGY; PROPHYLACTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; PSYCHOLOGY; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; PROPHYLACTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL DIALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84955267871     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-016-0225-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Knoll G, Cockfield S, Blydt-Hansen T, Baran D, Kiberd B, Landsberg D, et al. Canadian Society of Transplantation consensus guidelines on eligibility for kidney transplantation. CMAJ. 2005;173:1181-4.
2. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1725-30.
3. Jaar BG, Chang A, Plantinga L. Can we improve quality of life of patients on dialysis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1-4.
4. Loos C, Briançon S, Frimat L, Hanesse B, Kessler M. Effect of end-stage renal disease on the quality of life of older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:229-33.
5. Griva K, Davenport A, Harrison M, Newman SP. The impact of treatment transitions between dialysis and transplantation on illness cognitions and quality of life - a prospective study. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17:812-27.
6. Schipper K, Abma TA, Koops C, Bakker I, Sanderman R, Schroevers MJ. Sweet and sour after renal transplantation: a qualitative study about the positive and negative consequences of renal transplantation. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19:580-91.
7. Huang Y, Samaniego M. Preemptive kidney transplantation: has it come of age? Nephrol Ther. 2012;8:428-32.
8. Griva K, Davenport A, Newman SP. Health-related quality of life and long-term survival and graft failure in kidney transplantation: a 12-year follow-up study. Transplantation. 2013;95:740-9.
9. Khimani N, Chen YH, Mauch PM, Recklitis C, Diller L, Silver B, et al. Influence of new late effects on quality of life over time in Hodgkin lymphoma Survivors: a longitudinal survey study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:226-30.
10. Kim JH, Kwon SY, Lee JH, Lee YS, Lee CH. Virologic response to therapy increases health-related quality of life for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:291-6.
11. Palermo TM, Law E, Churchill SS, Walker A. Longitudinal course and impact of insomnia symptoms in adolescents with and without chronic pain. J Pain. 2012;13:1099-106.
12. Ring L, Höfer S, Heuston F, Harris D, O'Boyle CA. Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): the example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:55.
13. Bloom JR, Petersen DM, Kang SH. Multi-dimensional quality of life among long-term (5+ years) adult cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2007;16:691-706.
14. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Jepson C. Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:599-607.
15. Lelorain S, Tessier P, Florin A, Bonnaud-Antignac A. Posttraumatic growth in long term breast cancer survivors: relation to coping, social support and cognitive processing. J Health Psychol. 2011;17:627-39.
16. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1531-48.
17. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1507-15.
18. Barclay-Goddard R, Epstein JD, Mayo NE. Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:335-46.
19. Luckett T, King MT. Choosing patient-reported outcome measures for cancer clinical research - practical principles and an algorithm to assist non-specialist researchers. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3149-57.
20. Schwartz CE, Feinberg RG, Jilinskaia E, Applegate JC. An evaluation of a psychosocial intervention for survivors of childhood cancer: paradoxical effects of response shift over time. Psychooncology. 1999;8:344-54.
21. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:455-64.
22. Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL, RRTC Expert Panel on Health Status Measurement. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:529-36.
23. Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, Davis CL, Delmonico FL, Friedewald JJ, et al. Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:471-80.
24. Beauger D, Gentile S, Jouve E, Dussol B, Jacquelinet C, Briançon S. Analysis, evaluation and adaptation of the ReTransQoL: a specific quality of life questionnaire for renal transplant recipients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:148.
25. Leplège A, Ecosse E, Pouchot J, Coste J, Perneger T. Le questionnaire MOS SF-36: manuel de l'utilisateur et guide d'interprétation des scores. Paris: Estem; 2001.
26. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49:71-5.
27. Pavot W, Diener E. The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. J Positive Psychol. 2008;3:137-52.
28. Lepine JP, Godchau M, Brun P, Lempérière T, et al. Evaluation of anxiety and depression among patients hospitalized on an internal medicine service. Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1985;143(2):175-89.
29. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-70.
30. Quintard B. Du stress objectif au stress perçu. Introduction à la psychologie de la santé. Paris: PUF; 1994.
31. Muller L, Spitz E. Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population. Encéphale. 2003;29:507-18.
32. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9:455-71.
33. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247-54.
34. Foucher Y, Daguin P, Akl A, Kessler M, Ladrière M, Legendre C, et al. A clinical scoring system highly predictive of long-term kidney graft survival. Kidney Int. 2010;78:1288-94.
35. Girerd X, Hanon O, Anangnostopoulos K, Cirepek L, Mourad JJ, Consoli S. Evaluation de l'observance du traitement antihypertenseur par un questionnaire: mise au point et utilisation dans un service spécialisé. Presse Med. 2001;30:1044-8.
36. Bollen K. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
37. Fisher G, Molenaar I. Rasch Models, Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Wiley; 1995.
38. Oort FJ. Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:587-98.
39. Guilleux A, Blanchin M, Vanier A, Guillemin F, Falissard B, Schwartz CE, et al. RespOnse Shift ALgorithm in Item response theory (ROSALI) for response shift detection with missing data in longitudinal patient-reported outcome studies. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:553-64.
40. Pinheiro J, Bates D. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
41. Giral M, Foucher Y, Karam G, Labrune Y, Kessler M, Hurault de Ligny M, et al. Kidney and recipient weight incompatibility reduces long-term graft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:1022-9.
42. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley; 2002.
43. Swartz RJ, Schwartz C, Basch E, Cai L, Fairclough DL, McLeod L, et al. The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes: current practices and new developments for the measurement of change. Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1159-67.
44. Hardouin JB, Conroy R, Sebille V. Imputation by the mean score should be avoided when validating a Patient Reported Outcomes questionnaire by a Rasch model in presence of informative missing data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:105.
45. Sebille V, Hardouin JB, Mesbah M. Sequential analysis of latent variables using mixed-effect latent variable models: Impact of non-informative and informative missing data. Stat Med. 2007;26:4889-904.
46. De Bock E, Hardouin JB, Blanchin M, Le Neel T, Kubis G, Sébille V. Assessment of score- and Rasch-based methods for group comparison of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes with intermittent missing data (informative and non-informative). Qual Life Res (Quantitative Methods Special Section), 2014, in press.
47. De Bock E, Hardouin JB, Blanchin M, Le Neel T, Kubis G, Bonnaud-Antignac A, et al: Rasch-family models are more valuable than score-based approaches for analysing patient-reported outcomes with missing data. Stat Methods Med Res 2013 vol. 16, published on line, in press.
48. Thomas ML. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review. Assessment. 2011;18(3):291-307.