RespOnse Shift ALgorithm in Item response theory (ROSALI) for response shift detection with missing data in longitudinal patient-reported outcome studies

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 553-564

  Guilleux, Alice ^a   Blanchin, Myriam ^a   Vanier, Antoine ^a,b,c   Guillemin, Francis ^d   Falissard, Bruno ^e,f   Schwartz, Carolyn E ^g,h   Hardouin, Jean Benoit ^a,i   Sébille, Véronique ^a,i  

^a Universite de Nantes   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^e Universite Paris Sud   (France)

^f HÔPITAL PAUL BROUSSE   (France)

^g DeltaQuest Foundation Inc   (United States)

^h TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Attrition; Bias; Item response theory; Missing data; Quality of life; Response shift

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; CHRONIC DISEASE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ALGORITHMS; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84925486136     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0876-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation,14(3), 587–598.
2. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley.
3. Swartz, R. J., Schwartz, C., Basch, E., Cai, L., Fairclough, D. L., McLeod, L., et al. (2011). The king’s foot of patient-reported outcomes: Current practices and new developments for the measurement of change. Quality of Life Research,20(8), 1159–1167.
4. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer.
5. Wang, W.-C., & Chyi-In, W. (2004). Gain score in item response theory as an effect size measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement,64(5), 758–780.
6. Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and rasch measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research,11, 571–585.
7. De Bock, E., Hardouin, J. -B., Blanchin, M., Le Neel, T., Kubis, G., Bonnaud-Antignac, A., et al. (2013). Rasch-family models are more valuable than score-based approaches for analysing longitudinal patient-reported outcomes with missing data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research (in press).
8. Sébille, V., Hardouin, J.-B., & Mesbah, M. (2007). Sequential analysis of latent variables using mixed-effect latent variable models: Impact of non-informative and informative missing data. Statistics in Medicine,26(27), 4889–4904.
9. Hardouin, J.-B., Conroy, R., & Sébille, V. (2011). Imputation by the mean score should be avoided when validating a Patient Reported Outcomes questionnaire by a Rasch model in presence of informative missing data. BMC Medical Research Methodology,11(1), 105.
10. De Bock, É. de, Hardouin, J. -B., Blanchin, M., Neel, T. L., Kubis, G., & Sébille, V. (2014). Assessment of score- and Rasch-based methods for group comparison of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes with intermittent missing data (informative and non-informative). Quality of Life Research, 1–11.
11. Hamel J. F., Sébille V., Le Neel T., Kubis G., & Hardouin J. B. (2012) Study of different methods for comparing groups by analysis of patients reported outcomes: Item response theory based methods seem more efficient than classical test theory based methods when data is missing. Under review.
12. Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science & Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548.
13. Glas, C. A. W. (1988). The derivation of some tests for the Rasch model from the multinomial distribution. Psychometrika,53, 525–546.
14. Glas, C. A. W. (2010). http://www.utwente.nl/gw/omd/Medewerkers/temp_test/mirt-manual.pdf
15. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
16. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software,48(2), 1–36.
17. R Development Core Team. (n.d.). R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
18. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research-Online,8, 23–74.
19. Bryant, F. B., & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference Chi Square testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,19(3), 372–398.
20. Enders, C. K. (2013). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In Structural Equation (Ed.), Modeling: a second course (pp. 493–519). Charlotte, NC: IAP, Information Age Publ.
21. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling,8(3), 430–457.
22. Kepka, S., Baumann, C., Anota, A., Buron, G., Spitz, E., Auquier, P., Guillemin, F., Mercier, M. (2013). The relationship between traits optimism and anxiety and health-related quality of life in patients hospitalized for chronic diseases: data from the SATISQOL study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 134.
23. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care,30(6), 473–483.
24. Leplège, A., Ecosse, E., Verdier, A., & Perneger, T. V. (1998). The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,51(11), 1013–1023.
25. Leplège, A. (2001). Le questionnaire MOS SF-36: manuel de l’utilisateur et guide d’interprétation des scores. Paris: Editions ESTEM.
26. Fairclough, D. L. (2002). Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials: Interdisciplinary statistics. London: Chapman & Hall/Crc.
27. Hamel, J.-F., Hardouin, J.-B., Le Neel, T., Kubis, G., Roquelaure, Y., & Sébille, V. (2012). Biases and power for groups comparison on subjective health measurements. PLoS ONE,7(10), e44695.