Examining the cause of high inbreeding depression: Analysis of whole-genome sequence data in 28 selfed progeny of Eucalyptus grandis

New Phytologist

Volumn 209, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 600-611

  Hedrick, Philip W ^a   Hellsten, Uffe ^b   Grattapaglia, Dario ^c,d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE BRASÍLIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Eucalyptus grandis; Heterozygosity; Heterozygote advantage; Linkage disequilibrium; Pseudo overdominance; Tree; Viability

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DICOTYLEDON; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PATERNITY; TREE; VIABILITY;

EUCALYPTUS GRANDIS;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EUCALYPTUS; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; POLLINATION; SELF FERTILIZATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EUCALYPTUS; GENOME, PLANT; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MODELS, GENETIC; POLLINATION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

EID: 84955189887     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13639     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Burgess IP, Williams ER, Bell JC, Harwood CE, Owen JV. 1996. The effect of outcrossing rate on the growth of selected families of Eucalyptus grandis. Silvae Genetica 45: 97-100.
2. Burrows DM, Burrows WH. 1992. Seed production and litter fall in some eucalypt communities in central Queensland. Australian Journal of Botany 40: 389-403.
3. Chaix G, Gerber S, Razafimaharo V, Vigneron P, Verhaegen D, Hamon S. 2003. Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 705-712.
4. Charlesworth D, Willis JH. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Genetics 10: 783-798.
5. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Potts BM. 2011. The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus. Heredity 107: 50-60.
6. Darwin CR. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. London, UK: John Murray.
7. Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood C, van Wyk G. 1993. Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
8. Franklin I. 1977. The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals. Theoretical Population Biology 11: 60-80.
9. Goh T, Uchida W, Arakawa S, Ito E, Dainobu T, Ebine K, Takeuchi M, Sato K, Ueda T, Nakano A. 2007. VPS9a, the common activator for two distinct types of Rab5 GTPases, is essential for the development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 19: 3504-3515.
10. Grattapaglia D, Vaillancourt RE, Shepherd M, Thumma BR, Foley W, Kulheim C, Potts BM, Myburg AA. 2012. Progress in Myrtaceae genetics and genomics: Eucalyptus as the pivotal genus. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 463-508.
11. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP. 1988. Genetic-variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genetica 37: 124-131.
12. Hardner CM, Potts BM. 1995. Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. Globulus. Silvae Genetica 44: 46-54.
13. Hedrick PW. 2011. Genetics of populations. Sudbury, MA, USA: Jones and Bartlett.
14. Hedrick PW. 2012. What is the evidence for heterozygote advantage selection? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 698-704.
15. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski S. 2000. Inbreeding depression and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 139-162.
16. Keller LF, Waller DM. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 230-241.
17. McGowen MH, Vaillancourt RE, Pilbeam DJ, Potts BM. 2010. Sources of variation in self-incompatibility in the Australian forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus. Annals of Botany 105: 737-745.
18. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ. 1956. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 42: 855-863.
19. Myburg AA, Grattapaglia D, Tuskan GA, Hellsten U, Hayes RD, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Lindquist E, Tice H, Bauer D et al. 2014. The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. Nature 510: 356-362.
20. Ohta T. 1971. Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genetical Research 18: 277-286.
21. Petroli CD, Sansaloni CP, Carling J, Steane DA, Vaillancourt RE, Myburg AA, da Silva OB, Pappas GJ, Kilian A, Grattapaglia D. 2012. Genomic characterization of dart markers based on high-density linkage analysis and physical mapping to the eucalyptus genome. PLoS One 7: e44684.
22. Silva-Junior DA, Grattapaglia D. 2015. Genome-wide patterns of recombination, linkage disequilibrium, and nucleotide diversity from pooled resequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping unlock the evolutionary history of Eucalyptus grandis. New Phytologist 208: 830-845.