The effects of age and environment on the expression of inbreeding depression in Eucalyptus globulus

Heredity

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 50-60

  Costa E Silva, J ^a,b   Hardner, C ^c   Tilyard, P ^d   Potts, B M ^d  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

additive and non additive genetic effects; age trends; genotype by environment interaction; inbreeding depression; outcrossing; selfing

Indexed keywords

AGE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DIAMETER; EPISTASIS; EVERGREEN TREE; FITNESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MAGNITUDE; OUTCROSSING; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POLLINATION; STABILIZATION; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; EUCALYPTUS; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INBREEDING;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ENVIRONMENT; EUCALYPTUS; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS;

EID: 79959317792     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.154     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242. (Pubitemid 43093238)
2. Bartlett MS (1947). The use of transformations. Biometrics 3: 39-52.
3. Botham R, Collin CL, Ashman TL (2009). Plant-mycorrhizal fungus interaction affect the expression of inbreeding depression in wild strawberry. Int J Plant Sci 170: 143-150.
4. Brown AR, Hosken DJ, Balloux F, Bickley LK, LePage G, Owen SF et al. (2009). Genetic variation, inbreeding and chemical exposure-combined effects in wildlife and critical considerations for ecotoxicology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 3377-3390.
5. Byrne M (2008). Phylogeny, diversity and evolution of eucalypts. In: Sharma AK, Sharma A (eds). Plant Genome: Biodiversity and Evolution, vol. 1, Part E, Phanerogams- Angiosperm. Science Publishers: Enfield, pp 303-346.
6. Carr DE, Dudash MR (2003). Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358: 1071-1084. (Pubitemid 36774901)
7. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1999). The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res 74: 329-340. (Pubitemid 30076811)
8. Charlesworth D (2006). Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr Biol 16: R726-R735. (Pubitemid 44691782)
9. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
10. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10: 783-796.
11. Cheptou PO, Mathias A (2001). Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary selfing rates? Am Nat 157: 361-373. (Pubitemid 32235236)
12. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Pires AM, Potts BM (2010a). Effects of inbreeding on population mean performance and observational variances in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67 (doi:10.1051/forest/2010018).
13. Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Potts BM (2010b). Genetic variation and parental performance under inbreeding for growth in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67 (doi:10.1051/forest/2010019).
14. Costa e Silva J, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW (2006). Genotype by environment interaction for growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Australia. Tree Genet Genom 2: 61-75. (Pubitemid 44197965)
15. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270. (Pubitemid 29498795)
16. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics. Harper & Row Publishers: New York.
17. Dudash MR, Carr DE, Fenster CB (1997). Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus- inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51: 54-65.
18. Durel CE, Bertin P, Kremer A (1996). Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Theor Appl Genet 92: 347-356. (Pubitemid 26263372)
19. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006). ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK.
20. Goodnight CJ (1987). On the effect of founder events on epistatic genetic variance. Evolution 41: 80-91.
21. Goodnight CJ (1988). Epistasis and the effect of founder events on the additive genetic variance. Evolution 42: 441-454.
22. Griffin AR, Cotterill PP (1988). Genetic variation in growth of outcrossed, selfed and open-pollinated progenies of Eucalyptus regnans and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 37: 124-131.
23. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1995). Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing Eucalyptus globulus subsp globulus. Silvae Genet 44: 46-54.
24. Hardner CM, Potts BM (1997). Post-dispersal selection under mixed-mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51: 103-111.
25. Hardner CM, Potts BM, Gore PL (1998). The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 52: 614-618. (Pubitemid 28222732)
26. Helenurm K, Schaal BA (1996). Genetic load, nutrient limitation, and seed production in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 83: 1585-1595.
27. Hodge GR, Volker PW, Potts BM, Owen JV (1996). A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor Appl Genet 92: 53-63. (Pubitemid 26263410)
28. Husband BC, Schemske DC (1996). Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
29. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 230-241. (Pubitemid 34270584)
30. Kelly JK (1999). An experimental method for evaluating the contribution of deleterious mutations to quantitative trait variation. Genet Res 73: 263-273. (Pubitemid 29358617)
31. Kelly JK, Arathi HS (2003). Inbreeding and the genetic variance in floral traits of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90: 77-83. (Pubitemid 36251127)
32. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53: 983-997. (Pubitemid 27391027)
33. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985). The evolution of self-fertilisation and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40. (Pubitemid 16276773)
34. Lerner I (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh, Scotland.
35. Lhamo N, Ramsey M, Vaughton G (2006). Density- and frequency-dependent inbreeding depression in the Australian annual Hibiscus trionum var. vesicarius. Evol Ecol Res 8: 717-730.
36. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA.
37. Matheson AC, White TL, Powell GR (1995). Effects of inbreeding on growth, stem form and rust resistance on Pinus elliottii. Silvae Genet 44: 37-46.
38. McGowen M, Vaillancourt RE, Pilbeam D, Potts BM (2010). Sources of variation in self-incompatibility in the Australian forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus. Ann Bot 105: 737-745.
39. Mimura M, Barbour RC, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Watanabe KN (2009). Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol Ecol 18: 4180-4192.
40. Moorad JA, Wade MJ (2005). A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression. Genetics 170: 1373-1384. (Pubitemid 41105489)
41. Pray LA, Goodnight CJ (1995). Genetic variation in inbreeding depression in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evolution 49: 176-188.
42. Pujol B, McKey D (2006). Size asymmetry in intraspecific competition and the density-dependence of inbreeding depression in a natural plant population: a case study in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae). J Evol Biol 19: 85-96.
43. Pujol B, Zhou SR, Vilas JS, Pannell JR (2009). Reduced inbreeding depression after species range expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15379-15383.
44. Ritland K (1996). Inferring the basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Genome 39: 1-8.
45. Robertson A (1952). The effect of inbreeding on the variation due to recessive genes. Genetics 37: 188-207.
46. Ronce O, Shaw FH, Rousset F, Shaw RG (2009). Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model. Evolution 63: 1807-1819.
47. SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC.
48. Schmitt J, Ehrhardt DW (1990). Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44: 269-278. (Pubitemid 20429191)
49. Sedgley M, Griffin AR (1989). Sexual Reproduction of Tree Crops. Academic Press: London.
50. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591-611.
51. Shaw RG, Byers DL, Shaw FH (1998). Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: Morphology and flowering time. Genetics 150: 1649-1661. (Pubitemid 28555566)
52. Steane DA, Conod N, Jones RC, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2006). A comparative analysis of population structure of a forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae), usingmicrosatellite markers and quantitative traits. Tree Genet Genom 2: 30-38. (Pubitemid 44197974)
53. Stram DO, Lee JW (1994). Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
54. Tamaki I, Ishida K, Setsuko S, Tomaru N (2009). Interpopulation variation in mating system and late-stage inbreeding depression in Magnolia stellata. Mol Ecol 18: 2365-2374.
55. Tomé M, Tomé JA, Araújo MC, Pereira JS (1994). Intraspecific competition in irrigated and fertilized eucalypt plantations. For Ecol Manage 69: 211-218.
56. Volker PW (2002). Quantitative genetics of Eucalyptus globulus, E. nitens and their F1 hybrid. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.
57. Volker PW, Potts BM, Borralho NMG (2008). Genetic parameters of intra- and inter-specific hybrids of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens. Tree Genet Genom 4: 445-460.
58. Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ (2008). Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62: 917-931. (Pubitemid 351489919)
59. White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007). Forest Genetics. CABI: Wallingford, UK.
60. Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996). Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For Sci 42: 102-117. (Pubitemid 26263128)
61. Wu HX, Matheson AC, Spencer D (1998). Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. I. The effect of inbreeding on growth, survival and variance. Theor Appl Genet 97: 1256-1268. (Pubitemid 29009988)