Economic and environmental performance of the firm: Synergy or Trade-off? insights from the EOQ model

International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

Volumn 197, Issue , 2014, Pages 121-137

  van der Veen, Jack A A ^a   Venugopal, V ^a  

^a NYENRODE BUSINESS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955161372     PISSN: 08848289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7639-9_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M (2010) Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. Working paper, University of Minnesota. http://isye.umn.edu/faculty/pdf/beyada-10-02-10-final.pdf, accessed 19 January 2013
2. Bonney M, Jaber MY (2011) Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era. International Journal Production Economics, 133(1): 43-53
3. Boons F, Wagner M (2009) Assessing the relationship between economic and ecological performance: Distinguishing system levels and the role of innovation. Ecological Economics 68: 1908-1914
4. Borgonovo E (2010) Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models, European Journal of Operational Research 200: 127-138
5. Bouchery Y, Ghaffari A, Jemai Z, Dallery Y (2012) Including sustainability criteria into inventory models, European Journal of Operational Research 222: 229-240
6. Brønn P, Vidaver-Cohen D (2009) Corporate motives for social initiative: legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics 87: 91-109
7. Butner K, Geuder D, Hittner J (2008) Mastering carbon Management: Balancing trade-offs to optimize supply chain efficiencies. IBM Institute for Business Value. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/uk/bcs/pdf/mastering_carbon_management.pdf, accessed 19 January 2013
8. Can Arslan M, Turkay M (2010) EOQ revisited with sustainability considerations. Working paper, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey. http://home.ku.edu.tr/~mturkay/pub/EOQ_Sustainability.pdf, accessed 19 January 2013
9. Chen X, Benjaafar S, Elomri A, (2012) The carbon-constrained EOQ, Operations Research Letters, doi:10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.003
10. Corbett CJ, Klassen RD (2006), Extending the horizons: Environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 8(1): 5-22
11. Filbeck F, Gorman RF (2004) The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 137-157
12. Franck A (2008) Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A tool for reinforcing shareholder value. Accenture Supply Chain Management Viewpoint. http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture-Sustainable-Supply-Chain-Management.pdf, accessed 19 January 2013
13. Griffin JJ, Mahon JF (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society 36(1): 5-31
14. Gupta MC (1995) Environmental management and its impact on the operations function. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(8): 34-51
15. Hua G, Cheng TCE, Wang S (2011) Managing carbon footprints in inventory management, International Journal Production Economics 132: 178-185
16. Hsu T (2011) Wal-Mart’s motive is no secret: going green saves it money. Los Angeles Times. June 4. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/04/business/la-fi-walmart-green-20110604, accessed 19 January 2013
17. King A, Lenox M (2001) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance, The Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(1): 105-116
18. Klassen R, McLaughlin C (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance, Management Science 42(8): 1199-1215
19. Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management 26(6): 1075-1082
20. Palme K, Wallace E, Portney P (1995) Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 119-132
21. Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995), Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct: 120-134
22. Seuring S, Muller M (2008), From a Literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner production 16: 1699-1710
23. Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T (2002): The link between ‘green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management 65: 339-346
24. Walley N, Whitehead B (1994), It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review 72(3): 2-7