Differential semblance velocity analysis by wave-equation migration

SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 2132-2135

  Shen, Peng ^a   Symes, William W ^a   Stolk, Christiaan C ^b  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955126671     PISSN: 10523812     EISSN: 19494645     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1817759     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bourgeois, A., Lailly, P., and Versteeg, R-, 1991, The Mar-mousi model in Versteeg, R., and Grau, G., Eds., The Marmousi Experience.
2. Brandsberg-Dahl, S., De Hoop, M., and Ursin, B., 2003, Focusing in dip and AVA compensation on scatter-ing angle/azimuth common image gathers: Geophysics. 68, 232-254.
3. Chauris, H., and Noble, M., 2001, Two-dimensional ve-locity niacm model estimation from seismic reflect ion data by local differential semblance optimization: ap-plications synthetic and real data sets: Geophys. J. Int., 144, 14-26.
4. Chavent, G., and Lemonnier, P., 1974, Identification de la non-linearite d'une equation parabolique quasi-lineaire: Appl. Math, and Opt., 1.
5. Claerbout, J. F., 1985, Imaging the earth's interior: Black well Scientific Publications, Oxford.
6. de Bruin, C. G. M., Wapenaar, C. P. A., and Berkhout, A. J., 1990, Angle-dependent reflectivity by means of prestack migration: Geophysics, 55, 1223-1234.
7. De Hoop, M., Le Rousseau, J., and Wu, R.-S., 2000, Gen-eralization of the phase-screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves: Wave Motion, 31, 43-70.
8. Lions, J., 1972, Nonhomogeneous boundary value prob-lems and applications: Springer Verlag, Berlin.
9. Mulder, W., and ten Kroode, A., 2002, Automatic ve-locity analysis by differential semblance optimization: Geophysics 67, 1184-1191.
10. Xocedal, J., ami Wright, S. 1999. Numerical optimiza-tion: Springer Verlag, New York.
11. Nolan, C. J., and Symes, W. W., 1996, Imaging and con-herency in complex structure: 66th Annual Interna-tional Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 359-363.
12. Nolan, C., and Symes, W., 1997, Global solution of a lin-earized inverse problem for the wave equation: Comm. P. D. E., 22, 919-952.
13. Prucha, M., Biondi, B., and Symes, W., 1999, Angle-domain common image gathers by wave-equation mi-gration: 69th Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 824-827.
14. Ristow, D., and Ruhl, T., 1994, Fourier finite-difference migration: Geophysics, 59, 1882-1893.
15. st Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 296-299.
16. Stolk, C. C, and De Hoop, M. V., Decem-ber 2001, Seismic inverse scattering in the 'wave-equation' approach, Preprint 2001-017, The Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, http://msri.org/publications/preprints/2001.html.
17. Stolk, C, and Symes, W., 2002, Artifacts in Kirchhoff common image gathers: Expanded Abstracts, Soci-ety of Exploration Geophysicists, 72nd Annual Inter-national Meeting, SEG, 1129-1132.
18. Stolk, C. C., and Symes, W. W., 2003, Smooth objec-tive functionals for seismic velocity inversion: Inverse Problems, 19, 73-89.
19. Stolk, C. C., 2002, Microlocal analysis of the scattering angle transform: Comm. P. D. E., 27, 1879-1900.
20. Symes, W., and Carazzone, J., 1991, Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimization: Geophysics, 56, no. 5, 654-663.
21. Symes, W., 1986, Stability and instability results for in-verse problems in several-dimensional wave propaga-tion in Glowinski, R., and Lions, J., Eds., Proc. 7th In-ternational Conference on Computing Methods in Ap-plied Science and Engineering:: North-Holland.
22. Symes, W. W., 1998, High frequency asymptotics, differ-ential semblance, and velocity analysis: 68th Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geo-physicists, Expanded Abstracts, 1616-1619.
23. Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Elsevier.