Does the society perceive its own responsibility for modern pig production?

The Ethics of Consumption: The Citizen, the Market and the Law

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 386-392

  Weible, D ^a   Christoph Schulz, I B ^a   Salamon, P ^a  

^a THÜNEN INSTITUTE OF CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mixed method approach; Modern pig production; Responsibility; Societal expectations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955108506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_62     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Boogaard, B.K., Boekhorst, L.J.S., Oosting, S.J. and Sorensen, J.T. (2011). Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark. Livestock Science 140: 189-200.
2. Churchill, G.A. and Nielsen, A.C. (1995). Marketing research methodological foundations. The Dryden Pree, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
3. DLG (2009). Image der Landwirte deutlich verbessert, Pressemitteilung 15.01.2009. Available at: http://presse.dlg.org/publicArtikelDetail.do;jsessionid=3909BAD40BD82154B4BB17DF72CA7570?artikelId=2189&spracheId=1&kategorieId=1&bereich=Aktuelles&type=pdf.
4. Eurobarometer (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals, Eurobarometer Spezial 229. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/euro_barometer25_en.pdf.
5. Eurobarometer (2007). Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare, Eurobarometer Spezial 270. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_270_en.pdf.
6. Eurobarometer (2010). Europäer, Landwirtschaft und Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik, Eurobarometer Spezial 336. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_336_de.pdf.
7. Finch, H. and Lewis, J. (2003). Focus groups. In: Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (eds.) Qualitative research practice, Sage Publications Ltd., London, UK, p. 170-197.
8. Forsa (2012). Meinung zum Einsatz von Humanantibiotika in der Tierhaltung. Available at: http://bund.net/fileadmin/bundnet/pdfs/landwirtschaft/120508_bund_landwirtschaft_forsa_humanantibiotika_umfrage.pdf.
9. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
10. Harper, G. and Henson, S. (2001). Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impacton food choice. EU FAIR CT98-3678. Final Report, 38 p.
11. Heid, A. and Hamm. U. (2012). Consumer attitudes towards alternatives to piglet castration without pain relief in organic farming: qualitative results from Germany. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25: 687-706.
12. Kayser, M., Schlieker, K. und Spiller, A. (2012). Die Wahrnehmung des Begriffs 'Massentierhaltung' aus Sicht der Gesellschaft. In: Berichte über Landwirtschaft 90(3): 417-428.
13. Krystallis, A., De Barcellos, M.D., Kügler, J.O., W. Verbeke and K.G. Grunert, (2009). Attitudes of European citizens towards pig production systems. Livestock Science 126: 46-56.
14. Lassen, J., Sandøe, P. and Forkman, B. (2006). Happy pigs are dirty!-conflicting perspectives on animal welfare. Livestock Science 103(3): 221-230.
15. Nestlé Deutschland AG (2012). Die 'Quality Eater' erobern den Supermarkt, Pressemitteilung 'Das is(s)t Qualität'. Available at: http://www.nestle.de/Unternehmen/Nestle-Studie/Nestle-Studie-2012/Documents/Pressemitteilung_Studie_Das_isst_Qualitaet.pdf.
16. SGS Fresenius (2011). Verbraucherstudie 2011 "Lebensmittelqualität & Verbrauchermacht.
17. TNS Emnid (2012). Das Image der deutschen Landwirtschaft: Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativbefragung, März 2012. Available at: http://www.ima-agrar.de/fileadmin/redaktion/download/image-studie/2012/ima-imagestudielandwirtschaft_charts-2012.pdf.
18. Von Alvensleben, R. (2002). Neue Wege in der Tierhaltung-Verbraucheransichten und -einsichten. In: KTBL (ed.) Neue Wege in der Tierhaltung. KTBL-Schrift 408: S. 25-32.
19. Wilson, V. (1997). Focus groups: a useful qualitative method for educational research? British Educational Research Journal 23(2): 209-224.