Flipping undergraduate finite mathematics: Findings and implications

PRIMUS

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 814-832

  Guerrero, Shannon ^a   Beal, Melissa ^a   Lamb, Chris ^a   Sonderegger, Derek ^a   Baumgartel, Drew ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Flipped classroom; Inverted pedagogy; Mathematics education; Screen casting; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954551493     PISSN: 10511970     EISSN: 19354053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2015.1046003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baird, D. E. and Fisher, M. 2006. Neomillenial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support “always on” learning styles. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 34(1): 5-32.
2. Becker, W. E. and Watts, M. 1995. Teaching tools: Teaching methods in undergraduate economics. Economic Inquiry. 33: 692-700.
3. Bergman, J. and Sams, A. 2012. Flip your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Cebeci, Z. and Tekdal, M. 2006. Using podcasts as audio learning objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. 2: 7-57.
6. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C. 2011. Improved learning in a large enrollment physics class. Science. 332(8): 862-864.
7. Fautch, J. M. 2013. Flipped organic chemistry classroom at a small comprehensive college: Organic chemistry upside down. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, p. 245.
8. Frederickson, N., Reed, P., and Clifford, V. 2005. Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education. 50(4): 645-664.
9. Gojak, L. M. 2012. To flip or not to flip: That is NOT the question! http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=34585. Last accessed 12 March 2014.Flipping Undergraduate Finite Mathematics 831
10. Guerrero, S., Baumgartel, D., and Zobott, M. 2013. The use of screencasting to transform traditional pedagogy in a preservice mathematics content course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 32(2): 173-193.
11. Johnson, L. and Renner, J. 2012. Effect of the flipped classroom model on secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement. Ed.D. Dissertation. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
12. Khan Academy, https://www.khanacademy.org/. Last accessed 1 February 2015.
13. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., and Treglia, M. 2000. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education. 31(1): 30-43.
14. Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., and Swift, A. W. 2013. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 45(3): 1-8.
15. Mazur, E. 1991. Can we teach computers to teach? Computers in Physics. 5(1): 31-38.
16. Moore, A. J., Gillett, M. R., and Steele, M. D. 2014. Fostering student engagement with the flip. Mathematics Teacher. 107(6): 420-425.
17. Papadapoulos, C. and Roman, A. S. 2010. Implementing an inverted classroom model in engineering statistics: Initial results. In Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Louisville, KY. Washington, DC: ASEE/IEEE.
18. Pierce, R. 2013. Student performance in a flipped class module. In R. McBride and M. Searson (Eds), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 942-954, Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
19. Ruddick, K. W. 2012. Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
20. Strayer, J. 2012. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments. 15(2): 171-193.
21. Tapia, M. 1996. The attitudes toward mathematics instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED404165. Last accessed 16 November 2014.
22. Tapia, M. and Marsh, G. E. 2002. Confirmatory factor analysis of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chattanooga, TN. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED471301. Last accessed 16 November 2014.