When Debunking Scientific Myths Fails (and When It Does Not): The Backfire Effect in the Context of Journalistic Coverage and Immediate Judgments as Prevention Strategy

Science Communication

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 3-25

  Peter, Christina ^a   Koch, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

backfire effect; experiment; judgment formation; memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954530094     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547015613523     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. I.Ajzen (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2. I.Ajzen (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3. L.Anchondo (2010). Top 10 myths about immigration. Retrieved from http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/high-school/top-10-myths-about-immigration
4. N.H.Anderson (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. H.R.ArkesL.BoehmG.Xu (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90026-3
6. H.R.ArkesC.HackettL.Boehm (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(2), 81-94. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960020203
7. F.T.Bacon (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241
8. I.BeggA.AnasS.Farinacci (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
9. I.BeggV.ArmourT.Kerr (1985). On believing what we remember. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 17, 199-214. doi:10.1037/h0080140
10. G.Y.BizerZ.L.TormalaD.D.RuckerR.E.Petty (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 646-653. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002
11. L.E.Boehm (1994). The validity effect: A search for mediating variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 285-293. doi:10.1177/0146167294203006
12. R.F.Bornstein (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
13. S.Chaiken (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.572
14. J.CohenP.CohenS.G.WestL.S.Aiken (2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. A.DechêneC.StahlJ.HansenM.Wänke (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251
16. European Union (2015). The top 10 myths about TTIP: Separating fact from fiction [Online information flyer]. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/march/tradoc_153266.pdf
17. J.S.B.Evans (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
18. M.FishbeinI.Ajzen (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173-222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. G.Gigerenzer (1984). External validity of laboratory experiments: The frequency-validity relationship. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 185-195. doi:10.2307/1422594
20. D.L.HamiltonS.J.ShermanK.B.Maddox (1999). Dualities and continua: Implications for understanding perceptions of persons and groups. In (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 606-629). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21. I.HargreavesJ.LewisT.Speers (2003). Towards a better map: Science, the public and the media. London, England: Economic and Social Research Council.
22. L.HasherD.GoldsteinT.Toppino (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1
23. R.HastieB.Park (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258
24. B.E.Hilbig (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 983-986. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
25. B.E.Hilbig (2012). Good things don’t come easy (to mind). Explaining framing effects in judgments of truth. Experimental Psychology, 59, 38-46. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000124
26. H.M.JohnsonC.M.Seifert (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420-1436. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
27. D.KahnemanS.Frederick (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. T.KochC.PeterM.Obermaier (2013). Optimisten glaubt man nicht. Wie sich valenzbasiertes Framing auf die Glaubwürdigkeit von Aussagen und deren Kommunikator auswirkt [Optimists do not believe you. How valence based framing affects the credibility of statements and their communicator]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61, 551-567.
29. T.KochT.Zerback (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63, 993-1010. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
30. J.H.KuklinskiP.J.QuirkJ.JeritD.SchwiederR.F.Rich (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62, 790-816. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033
31. H.Lavine (2002). On-line versus memory-based process models of political evaluation. In (Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 225-274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. D.Leiner (2012). SoSci Panel: The noncommercial online access panel. Poster presented at the General Online Research Conference, Mannheim, Germany.
33. D.Leiner (2014). Convenience samples from online respondent pools: A case study of the SoSci Panel (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259669050_Convenience_Samples_from_Online_Respondent_Pools_A_case_study_of_the_SoSci_Panel
34. S.LewandowskyU.K.H.EckerC.M.SeifertN.SchwarzJ.Cook (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106-131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
35. D.M.MackieA.G.Asuncion (1990). On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: Determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 5-16. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.5
36. G.Mandler (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
37. J.MatthesW.WirthC.Schemer (2007). Measuring the unmeasurable? Toward operationalizing on-line and memory-based political judgments in surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 247-257. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm001
38. B.NyhanJ.Reifler (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
39. B.NyhanJ.ReiflerS.RicheyG.L.Freed (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133, 835-842. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
40. C.M.ParksJ.P.Toth (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 225-253. doi:10.1080/138255890968691
41. R.E.PettyJ.T.Cacioppo (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
42. R.ReberN.Schwarz (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342. doi:10.1006/ccog.1999.0386
43. R.ReberN.SchwarzP.Winkielman (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
44. R.ReberP.WinkielmanN.Schwarz (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
45. A.L.RoggeveenG.V.Johar (2002). Perceived source variability versus familiarity: Testing competing explanations for the truth effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 81-91. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_02
46. M.Schwartz (1982). Repetition and rated truth value of statements. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 393-407. doi:10.2307/1422132
47. N.SchwarzL.J.SannaI.SkurnikC.Yoon (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127-161. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
48. I.SkurnikC.YoonD.C.ParkN.Schwarz (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713-724. doi:10.1086/426605
49. I.SkurnikC.YoonN.Schwarz (2007). “Myths & Facts” about the flu: Health education campaigns can reduce vaccination intentions. Retrieved from http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/yoonc/research/Papers/Skurnik_Yoon_Schwarz_2005_Myths_Facts_Flu_Health_Education_Campaigns_JAMA.pdf
50. T.K.SrullR.S.Wyer (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.58
51. Z.L.TormalaR.E.Petty (2001). On-line versus memory-based processing: The role of “need to evaluate” in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1599-1612. doi:10.1177/01461672012712004
52. A.TverskyD.Kahneman (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
53. C.Unkelbach (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339-345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x
54. C.Unkelbach (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219-230. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219
55. C.UnkelbachM.BayerH.AlvesA.KochC.Stahl (2011). Fluency and positivity as possible causes of the truth effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 594-602. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.015
56. A.L.WilkesM.Leatherbarrow (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 40, 361-387. doi:10.1080/02724988843000168