Use of registration-based contour propagation in texture analysis for esophageal cancer pathologic response prediction

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 906-922

  Yip, Stephen S F ^a   Coroller, Thibaud P ^a   Sanford, Nina N ^a   Huynh, Elizabeth ^a   Mamon, Harvey ^a   Aerts, Hugo J W L ^a,b   Berbeco, Ross I ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

contour propagation; deformable registration; esophageal cancer; PET; treatment response prediction

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEFORMATION; DISEASES; FORECASTING; PATHOLOGY; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; TUMORS;

ACCURATE PREDICTION; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; DIFFERENT TREATMENTS; ESOPHAGEAL CANCER; PATHOLOGIC RESPONSE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; SIMILARITY INDICES; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ALGORITHMS;

AGED; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; SCINTISCANNING;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84954449392     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/906     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aerts H J W L et al 2014 Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach Nat. Commun. 5 4006
2. Arimond M et al 2010 Simple food group diversity indicators predict micronutrient adequacy of women's diets in 5 diverse, resource-poor settings J. Nutrition 140 2059S-69S
3. Bamber D 1975 The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph Math. Psychol. 12 387-415
4. Barron J L, Fleet D J and Beauchemin S S 1994 Performance of optical flow techniques Int. J. Comput. Vis. 12 43-77
5. Benjamini Y and Hochberg Y 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57 289-300
6. Bradshaw T J, Yip S, Jallow N, Forrest L J and Jeraj R 2014 Spatiotemporal stability of Cu-ATSM and FLT positron emission tomography distributions during radiation therapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 89 399-405
7. Brooks F J and Grigsby P W 2014 The effect of small tumor volumes on studies of intratumoral heterogeneity of tracer uptake J. Nucl. Med. 55 37-42
8. Castadot P, Lee J A, Parraga A, Geets X, Macq B and Grégoire V 2008 Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors Radiother. Oncol. 89 1-12
9. Cheng N-M, Dean Fang Y-H, Tung-Chieh Chang J, Huang C-G, Tsan D-L, Ng S-H, Wang H-M, Lin C-Y, Liao C-T and Yen T-C 2013 Textural features of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT images: prognostic significance in patients with advanced T-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma J. Nucl. Med. 54 1703-9
10. Chicklore S, Goh V, Siddique M, Roy A, Marsden P and Cook G R 2013 Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 40 133-40
11. Cook G R, Siddique M, Taylor B, Yip C, Chicklore S and Goh V 2014 Radiomics in PET: principles and applications Clin. Transl. Imag. 2 269-76
12. Crouch J R, Pizer S M, Chaney E L, Yu-Chi H, Mageras G S and Zaider M 2007 Automated finite-element analysis for deformable registration of prostate images IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 26 1379-90
13. Damas S, Cordon O and Santamari J 2011 Medical image registration using evolutionary computation: an experimental survey IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 6 26-42
14. Davnall F, Yip C P, Ljungqvist G, Selmi M, Ng F, Sanghera B, Ganeshan B, Miles K, Cook G and Goh V 2012 Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights Imag. 3 573-89
15. Derek L G H, Philipp G B, Mark H and David J H 2001 Medical image registration Phys. Med. Biol. 46 R1
16. Dong X, Wu P, Sun X, Li W, Wan H, Yu J and Xing L 2015 Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging J. Med. Imag. Radiat. Oncol. 59 338-45
17. El Naqa I, Grigsby P W, Apte A, Kidd E, Donnelly E, Khullar D, Chaudhari S, Yang D, Schmitt M, Laforest R, Thorstad W L and Deasy J O 2009 Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes Pattern Recognit. 42 1162-71
18. Elad P and Feuer A 1996 Recursive optical flow estimation-adaptive filtering approach 19th Convention of Proc. Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, 1996 pp 387-90
19. Faggiano E, Fiorino C, Scalco E, Broggi S, Cattaneo M, Maggiulli E, Dell'Oca I, Muzio N D, Calandrino R and Rizzo G 2011 An automatic contour propagation method to follow parotid gland deformation during head-and-neck cancer tomotherapy Phys. Med. Biol. 56 775
20. Fang Y-H D, Lin C-Y, Shih M-J, Wang H-M, Ho T-Y, Liao C-T and Yen T-C 2014 Development and evaluation of an open-source software package CGITA; for quantifying tumor heterogeneity with molecular images BioMed Res. Int. 2014 9
21. Fisher R, Pusztai L and Swanton C 2013 Cancer heterogeneity: implications for targeted therapeutics Br. J. Cancer 108 479-85
22. Galloway M M 1975 Texture analysis using gray level run lengths Comput. Graph. Image Process. 4 172-9
23. Gentleman R C et al 2004 Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics Genome Biol. 5 R80
24. Gerlinger M et al 2012 Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing New England J. Med. 366 883-92
25. Glocker B, Sotiras A, Komodakis N and Paragios N 2011 Deformable medical image registration: setting the state of the art with discrete methods Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 13 219-44
26. Grégoire V, Jeraj R, Lee J A and O'Sullivan B 2012 Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours in 2012 and beyond: conformal, tailored, and adaptive? Lancet Oncol. 13 e292-300
27. Hanley J A and McNeil B J 1983 A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 148 839-43
28. Haralick R M, Shanmugam K and Dinstein I H 1973 Textural features for image classification IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet. SMC-3 610-21
29. Hardcastle N, van Elmpt W, De Ruysscher D, Bzdusek K and Tomé W A 2013 Accuracy of deformable image registration for contour propagation in adaptive lung radiotherapy Radiat. Oncol. (Lond. England) 8 243
30. Hatt M, Cheze-le Rest C, van Baardwijk A, Lambin P, Pradier O and Visvikis D 2011 Impact of tumor size and tracer uptake heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT non-small cell lung cancer tumor delineation J. Nucl. Med. 52 1690-7
31. Hatt M et al 2015 18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort J. Nucl. Med. 56 38-44
32. Hatt M, Tixier F, Cheze Le Rest C, Pradier O and Visvikis D 2013 Robustness of intratumour 18F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity quantification for therapy response prediction in oesophageal carcinoma Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 40 1662-71
33. He W, Lei D, Jennifer O D, Radhe M, Adam S G, Ang K K, Deborah A K, Mark B, Joe Y C and Rex C 2005 Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2887
34. Henriksson E, Kjellen E, Wahlberg P, Ohlsson T, Wennerberg J and Brun E 2007 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose uptake and correlation to intratumoral heterogeneity Anticancer Res. 27 2155-9
35. Horn B K P and Schunck B G 1981 Determining optical flow Artif. Intell. 17 185-203
36. Hualiang Z, Jinkoo K, Haisen L, Teamour N, Benjamin M and Indrin J C 2012 A finite element method to correct deformable image registration errors in low-contrast regions Phys. Med. Biol. 57 3499
37. Kirby N, Chuang C, Ueda U and Pouliot J 2013 The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration Med. Phys. 40 011702
38. Lambin P et al 2012 Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis Eur. J. Cancer 48 441-6
39. Leijenaar R T H et al 2013 Stability of FDG-PET radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability Acta Oncol. 52 1391-7
40. Leijenaar R T H, Nalbantov G, Carvalho S, van Elmpt W J C, Troost E G C, Boellaard R, Aerts H J W L, Gillies R J and Lambin P 2015 The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis Sci. Rep. 5 11075
41. Lu W, Chen M-L, Olivera H G, Ruchala J K and Mackie R T 2004 Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations Phys. Med. Biol. 49 3067
42. Lu W, Olivera G H, Chen Q, Chen M-L and Ruchala K J 2006 Automatic re-contouring in 4D radiotherapy Phys. Med. Biol. 51 1077
43. Lucas B D and Kanade T 1981 Proc. 7th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence vol 2 (Vancouver: Morgan Kaufmann) pp 674-9
44. Maley C C et al 2006 Genetic clonal diversity predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma Nat. Genet. 38 468-73
45. Marusyk A, Almendro V and Polyak K 2012 Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat. Rev. Cancer 12 323-34
46. Miller R G 1981 Simultaneous Statistical Inference (New York: Springer)
47. Modersitzki J 2004 Numerical Methods for Image Registration (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
48. Nie K, Chuang C, Kirby N, Braunstein S and Pouliot J 2013 Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations Med. Phys. 40 041911
49. Noether G E 1967 Elements of Nonparametric Statistics (New York: Wiley)
50. Orlhac F, Soussan M, Maisonobe J-A, Garcia C A, Vanderlinden B and Buvat I 2014 Tumor texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET: relationships between texture parameters, histogram indices, standardized uptake values, metabolic volumes, and total lesion glycolysis J. Nucl. Med. 55 414-22
51. Parmar C et al 2014 Robust radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation PLoS One 9 e102107
52. Rahim M, Kim S, So H, Kim H, Cheon G, Lee E, Kang K and Lee D 2014 Recent trends in PET image interpretations using volumetric and texture-based quantification methods in nuclear oncology Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 48 1-15
53. Rogelj P and Kovačič S 2006 Symmetric image registration Med. Image Anal. 10 484-93
54. Schröder M S, Culhane A C, Quackenbush J and Haibe-Kains B 2011 survcomp: an R/Bioconductor package for performance assessment and comparison of survival models Bioinformatics 27 3206-8
55. Stella F, Steve B J, Greg C S, John W, Abhijit A P and Noah C C 2006 Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations Phys. Med. Biol. 51 2763
56. Tan S, Kligerman S, Chen W, Lu M, Kim G, Feigenberg S, D'Souza W D, Suntharalingam M and Lu W 2013 Spatial-temporal [18F]FDG-PET features for predicting pathologic response of esophageal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 85 1375-82
57. Terwee C B, Bot S D M, de Boer M R, van der Windt D A W M, Knol D L, Dekker J, Bouter L M and de Vet H C W 2007 Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires J. Clin. Epidemiol. 60 34-42
58. Thibault G, Fertil B, Navarro C, Pereira S, Cau P, Levy N, Sequeira J and Mari J-L 2013 Shape and texture indexes application to cell nuclei classification Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artificial Intell. 27 1357002
59. Thirion J P 1996 Non-rigid matching using demons IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1996. Proc. CVPR '96 pp 245-51
60. Thirion J P 1998 Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons Med. Image Anal. 2 243-60
61. Thörnqvist S, Petersen J B B, Høyer M, Bentzen L N and Muren L P 2010 Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration Acta Oncol. 49 1023-32
62. Tixier F, Hatt M, Le Rest C C, Le Pogam A, Corcos L and Visvikis D 2012 Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med. 53 693-700
63. Tixier F, Le Rest C C, Hatt M, Albarghach N, Pradier O, Metges J-P, Corcos L and Visvikis D 2011 Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer J. Nucl. Med. 52 369-78
64. Urschler M, Kluckner S and Bischof H 2007 A framework for comparison and evaluation of nonlinear intra-subject image registration algorithms The Insight Journal-MICCAI Open Science Workshop
65. Veiga C, McClelland J, Moinuddin S, Lourenço A, Ricketts K, Annkah J, Modat M, Ourselin S, D'Souza D and Royle G 2014 Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for 'dose of the day' calculations Med. Phys. 41 031703
66. Velazquez E R et al 2013 Volumetric CT-based segmentation of NSCLC using 3D-Slicer Sci. Rep. 3 3529
67. Yang D, Brame S, El Naqa I, Aditya A, Wu Y, Goddu S M, Mutic S, Deasy J O and Low D A 2011 Technical note: DIRART - a software suite for deformable image registration and adaptive radiotherapy research Med. Phys. 38 67-77
68. Yang D, Li H, Low D A, Deasy J O and Naqa I E 2008 A fast inverse consistent deformable image registration method based on symmetric optical flow computation Phys. Med. Biol. 53 6143
69. Yang F, Thomas M, Dehdashti F and Grigsby P 2013 Temporal analysis of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity characterized by textural features in cervical cancer Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 40 716-27
70. Yin Y, Hoffman E A, Ding K, Reinhardt J M and Lin C-L 2011 A cubic B-spline-based hybrid registration of lung CT images for a dynamic airway geometric model with large deformation Phys. Med. Biol. 56 203-18
71. Yin Y, Hoffman E A and Lin C-L 2009 Mass preserving nonrigid registration of CT lung images using cubic B-spline Med. Phys. 36 4213-22
72. Yip S, Chen A B, Aerts H J W L and Berbeco R 2014 Sensitivity study of voxel-based PET image comparison to image registration algorithms Med. Phys. 41 111714
73. Zhong H, Kim J and Chetty I J 2010 Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling Med. Phys. 37 970-9
74. Zitová B and Flusser J 2003 Image registration methods: a survey Image Vis. Comput. 21 977-1000