Radial versus femoral access for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and intervention: Insights from the RIVAL trial

American Heart Journal

Volumn 170, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 880-886

  Cantor, Warren J ^a   Mehta, Shamir R ^b   Yuan, Fei ^b   Džavík, Vladimír ^c   Worthley, Matthew ^d   Niemelä, Kari ^e   Valentin, Vicent ^f   Fung, Anthony ^g   Cheema, Asim N ^h   Widimsky, Petr ⁱ   Natarajan, Madhu ^b   Jedrzejowski, Barbara ^b   Jolly, Sanjit S ^b  

^a SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^f HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DR PESET   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^h ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; FEMORAL ACCESS; GROUPS BY AGE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ACCESS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TREATMENT INDICATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMORAL ARTERY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84954305702     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Y. Kobayashi, R. Mehran, G.S. Mintz, and et al. Comparison of in-hospital and one-year outcomes after multiple coronary arterial stenting in patients > or =80 years old versus those <80 years old Am J Cardiol 92 2003 443 446
2. M.S. Chauhan, R.E. Kuntz, K.L. Ho, and et al. Coronary artery stenting in the aged J Am Coll Cardiol 37 2001 856 862
3. S.S. Jolly, S. Amlani, M. Hamon, and et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials Am Heart J 157 2009 132 140
4. O.F. Bertrand, P. Belisle, D. Joyal, and et al. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis Am Heart J 163 2012 632 648
5. Z. Cao, Y.J. Zhou, Y.X. Zhao, and et al. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in Chinese elderly patients Chin Med J (Engl) 121 2008
6. R. Bagur, O.F. Bertrand, J. Rodes-Cabau, and et al. Comparison of outcomes in patients > or =70 years versus <70 years after transradial coronary stenting with maximal antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome Am J Cardiol 104 2009
7. S.S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, J. Cairns, and et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial Lancet 377 2011 1409 1420
8. S.S. Jolly, K. Niemela, D. Xavier, and et al. Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes Am Heart J 161 2011 254 260
9. S.S. Jolly, J. Cairns, S. Yusuf, and et al. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 954 963
10. G.J. Dehmer, D. Weaver, M.T. Roe, and et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011 J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2017 2031
11. B.S. Yoo, J. Yoon, J.Y. Ko, and et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity Int J Cardiol 101 2005 421 427
12. B. Freestone, and J. Nolan Transradial cardiac procedures: the state of the art Heart 96 2010 883 891
13. P. Dehghani, A. Mohammad, R. Bajaj, and et al. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2 2009 1057 1064
14. D.N. Feldman, R.V. Swaminathan, L.A. Kaltenbach, and et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012) Circulation 127 2013 2295 2306
15. Y. Louvard, H. Benamer, P. Garot, and et al. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study) Am J Cardiol 94 2004 1177 1180
16. S. Achenbach, D. Ropers, L. Kallert, and et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72 2008
17. S.R. Mehta, S.S. Jolly, J. Cairns, and et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2490 2499
18. E. Romagnoli, G. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Sciahbasi, and et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2481 2489