Minimum dominating set-based methods for analyzing biological networks

Methods

Volumn 102, Issue , 2016, Pages 57-63

  Nacher, Jose C ^a   Akutsu, Tatsuya ^b  

^a TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Complex networks; Minimum dominating set; Network controllability; Protein protein interaction networks

Indexed keywords

UNTRANSLATED RNA;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; CLASSIFIER; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METABOLISM; METABOLOMICS; MINIMUM DOMINATING SET; NEOPLASM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; DATA MINING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; DATASETS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; METABOLOMICS; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84954285287     PISSN: 10462023     EISSN: 10959130     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.12.017     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Berger B., Peng J., Singh M. Computational solutions for omics data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14:333-346.
2. Vidal M., Cusick M.E., Barabási A.-L. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011, 144:986-995.
3. Barabási A.-L., Gulbahce N., Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:56-68.
4. Menche J., Sharma A., Kitsak M., Ghiassian D., Vidal M., Loscazlo J., Barabási A.-L. Uncovering disease-disease relationships through the incomplete interactome. Science 2015, 347. 1257601-1.
5. Hopkins A.L. Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4:682-690.
6. Csermely P., Korcsmaros T., Kiss H.J.M., London G., Nussinov R. Structure and dynamics of biological networks: a novel paradigm of drug discovery. A comprehensive review. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 138:333-408.
7. Chu L., Chen B.S. Construction of a cancer-perturbed protein-protein interaction network for discovery of apoptosis drug targets. BMC Syst. Biol. 2008, 2:56.
8. Azmi A., Wang Z., Phillip P.A., Mohammad R.M., Sarkar F.H. Proofs of concept: a review on how network and systems biology approaches aid in the discovery of potent anticancer drug combinations. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9:3137-3144.
9. Haynes T., Hedetniemi S.T., Slater P.J. Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Pure Applied Mathematics 1998, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York.
10. Cooper C., Klasing R., Zito M. Lower bounds and algorithms for dominating sets in web graphs. Internet Math. 2005, 2:275-300.
11. Nacher J.C., Akutsu T. Dominating scale-free networks with variable scaling exponent: heterogeneous networks are not difficult to control. New J. Phys. 2012, 14:073005.
12. Wuchty S. Controllability in protein interaction networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:7156-7160.
13. Fomin F.V., Grandoni F., Kratsch D. A measure & conquer approach for the analysis of exact algorithms. J. ACM 2009, 56:25.
14. van Rooij J.M.M., Bodlaender H.L. Exact algorithms for dominating set. Discrete Appl. Math. 2011, 159:2147-2164.
15. Iwata Y. A faster algorithm for dominating set analyzed by the potential method. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2012, 7112:41-54.
16. Hedar A.-R., Ismail R. Simulated annealing with stochastic local search for minimum dominating set problem. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyber. 2012, 3:97-109.
17. CPLEX web site: (Sept. 1, 2015). http://www-01.ibm.com/software/commerce/optimization/cplex-optimizer/.
18. Gurobi web site: (Sept. 1, 2015). http://www.gurobi.com/.
19. Nacher J.C., Akutsu T. Analysis of critical and redundant nodes in controlling directed and undirected complex networks using dominating sets. J. Comp. Network 2014, 2:394-412.
20. Ausiello G., Crescenzi P., Gambosi G., Kann V., Marchetti-Spaccamela A., Protasi M. Complexity and Approximation. Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Their Approximability Properties 1999, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
21. Vazirani V.V. Approximation Algorithms 2001, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Williamson D.P., Shmoys D.B. The Design of Approximation Algorithms 2011, Cambridge University Press, New York.
23. Nacher J.C., Akutsu T. Analysis on controlling complex networks based on dominating sets. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 410:012104.
24. Molnár F., Sreenivasan S., Szymanski B.K., Korniss G. Minimum dominating sets in scale-free network ensembles. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:1736.
25. Molnár F., Derzsy N., Czabarka É., Szeékely L., Szymanski B.K., Korniss G. Dominating scale-free networks using generalized probabilistic methods. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:6308.
26. Liu Y.-Y., Slotine J.-J., Barabási A.-L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 2011, 473:167-173.
27. Commault C., Dion J.-M., van der Woude J.W. Characterization of generic properties of linear structured systems for efficient computations. Kybernetika 2002, 38:503-520.
28. Nepusz T., Vicsek T. Controlling edge dynamics in complex networks. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8:568-573.
29. Jia T., Liu Y.-Y., Csokam E., Posfai M., Slotine J.-J., Barabási A.-L. Emergence of bimodality in controlling complex networks. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2002.
30. Nacher J.C., Akutsu T. Structural controllability of unidirectional bipartite networks. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:1647.
31. Nacher J.C., Akutsu T. Structurally robust control of complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 2015, 91:012826.
32. Molnár F., Derzsy N., Szymanski B.K., Korniss G. Building damage-resilient dominating sets in complex networks against random and targeted attacks. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:8321.
33. Zhang X.-F., Ou-Yang L., Zhu Y., Wu M.-Y., Dai D.-Q. Determining minimum set of driver nodes in protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform. 2015, 16:146.
34. Milenkovic T., Memisevic V., Bonato A., Przulj N. Dominating biological networks. PloS One 2011, 6:e23016.
35. Khuri S., Wuchty S. Essentiality and centrality in protein networks revisited. BMC Bioinfor. 2015, 16:109.
36. H. Wang, H. Zheng, F. Browne, C. Wang, Minimum dominating sets in cell cycle specific protein interaction networks, in: Proc. of the 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) pp. 25-30.
37. de Lichtenberg U., Jensen L., Brunak S., Bork P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 2005, 307:724-727.
38. Land A.H., Doig A.G. An automatic method of solving discrete programming-problems. Econometrica 1960, 28:497-520.
39. Kagami H., Akutsu T., Maegawa S., Hosokawa H., Nacher J.C. Determining associations between human diseases and non-coding RNAs with critical roles in network control. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:14577.
40. Asgari Y., Salehzadeh-Yazdi A., Schreiber F., Masoudi-Nejad A. Controllability in cancer metabolic networks according to drug targets as driver nodes. PLoS One 2013, 8:e79397.
41. Sun P.G. Controllability and modularity of complex networks. Inf. Sci. 2015, 325:20-32.