High Intensity Interval versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Physiological and Clinical Parameters

Heart Lung and Circulation

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 166-174

  Liou, Kevin ^a,c   Ho, Suyen ^b   Fildes, Jennifer ^a   Ooi, Sze Yuan ^a,c  

^a PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Continuous training; Coronary artery disease; Interval training; VO2peak

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

AEROBIC EXERCISE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL FEATURE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HIGH INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINESIOTHERAPY; LIPOPROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; META ANALYSIS; MODERATE INTENSITY CONTINUOUS TRAINING; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESTING HEART RATE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRIACYLGLYCEROL BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 84954197255     PISSN: 14439506     EISSN: 14442892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.828     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Heran B.S., Chen J.M., Ebrahim S., Moxham T., Oldridge N., Rees K., et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011, CD001800.
2. Kodama S., Saito K., Tanaka S., Maki M., Yachi Y., Asumi M. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2009, 301:2024-2035.
3. Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Savage PD, Ehrman JK, Schairer J, Divine G, et al. Peak aerobic capacity predicts prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. American Heart Journal 156: 292-300.
4. Elliott A.D., Rajopadhyaya K., Bentley D.J., Beltrame J.F., Aromataris E.C. Interval training versus continuous exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2015, 24:149-157.
5. Pattyn N., Coeckelberghs E., Buys R., Cornelissen V.A., Vanhees L. Aerobic interval training vs. moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2014, 44:687-700.
6. Conraads V.M., Pattyn N., De Maeyer C., Beckers P.J., Coeckelberghs E., Cornelissen V.A., et al. Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study. International Journal of Cardiology. 2015, 179:203-210.
7. Keteyian S.J., Hibner B.A., Bronsteen K., Kerrigan D., Aldred H.A., Reasons L.M., et al. Greater improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness using higher-intensity interval training in the standard cardiac rehabilitation setting. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention. 2014, 34:98-105.
8. Iellamo F., Manzi V., Caminiti G., Vitale C., Castagna C., Massaro M., et al. Matched dose interval and continuous exercise training induce similar cardiorespiratory and metabolic adaptations in patients with heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology. 2013, 167:2561-2565.
9. Currie K.D., Dubberley J.B., McKelvie R.S., MacDonald M.J. Low-volume, high-intensity interval training in patients with CAD. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2013, 45:1436-1442.
10. Rocco E.A., Prado D.M., Silva A.G., Lazzari J.M., Bortz P.C., Rocco D.F., et al. Effect of continuous and interval exercise training on the PETCO2 response during a graded exercise test in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinics. 2012, 67:623-627.
11. Moholdt T., Aamot I.L., Granoien I., Gjerde L., Myklebust G., Walderhaug L., et al. Aerobic interval training increases peak oxygen uptake more than usual care exercise training in myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2012, 26:33-44.
12. Moholdt T.T., Amundsen B.H., Rustad L.A., Wahba A., Lovo K.T., Gullikstad L.R., et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. American Heart Journal. 2009, 158:1031-1037.
13. Wisloff U., Stoylen A., Loennechen J.P., Bruvold M., Rognmo O., Haram P.M., et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007, 115:3086-3094.
14. Warburton D.E., McKenzie D.C., Haykowsky M.J., Taylor A., Shoemaker P., Ignaszewski A.P., et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2005, 95:1080-1084.
15. Rognmo O., Hetland E., Helgerud J., Hoff J., Slordahl S. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 2004, 11:216-222.
16. Vanhees L., Geladas N., Hansen D., Kouidi E., Niebauer J., Reiner Z., et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors: recommendations from the EACPR (Part II). European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2011.
17. Fox K., Borer J.S., Camm A.J., Danchin N., Ferrari R., Lopez Sendon J.L., et al. Resting heart rate in cardiovascular disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007, 50:823-830.
18. Billman G.E., Cagnoli K.L., Csepe T., Li N., Wright P., Mohler P.J., et al. Exercise training induced bradycardia: evidence for enhanced parasympathetic regulation without changes in "intrinsic" sinoatrial node function. J Appl Physiol 1985, 118(11 (Jun 1)):1344-1355. 2015.
19. Ramos J.S., Dalleck L.C., Tjonna A.E., Beetham K.S., Coombes J.S. The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine. 2015.
20. Briffa T., Eckermann S., Griffiths A., Keech A., Harris P., Heath M., et al. Cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after an acute coronary event: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust. 2005, 183:450-455.
21. Rognmo O., Moholdt T., Bakken H., Hole T., Molstad P., Myhr N.E., et al. Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate-intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation. 2012, 126:1436-1440.
22. Haykowsky M., Timmon M., Kruger C., McNeely M., Taylor D., Clark A. Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions. Am J Cardiol 2013, 111:1466-1469.