Searching for motifs in the behaviour of larval Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans reveals continuity between behavioural states

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 12, Issue 113, 2015, Pages

  Szigeti, Balazs ^a   Deogade, Ajinkya ^b   Webb, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

Author keywords

Behavioural states; Caenorhabditis elegans; Drosophila melanogaster larva; Eigenmaggots; Eigenworms; Ethogram

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY;

BEHAVIOURAL STATES; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EIGENMAGGOTS; EIGENWORMS; ETHOGRAM;

TIME SERIES;

BEHAVIOR; BODY POSTURE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CLASSIFICATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; LARVA; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOBEHAVIORAL SCIENCES; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; LARVA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84954181803     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0899     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Marin AG, Paton JJ, Kampff AR, Costa RM, Mainen ZF. 2014 Big behavioral data: Psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1455-1462. (doi:10.1038/nn.3812)
2. Kabra M, Robie AA, Alba MR, Branson S, Branson K. 2013 JAABA: Interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior. Nat. Methods 10, 64-67. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2281)
3. Ohyama T, Jovanic T, Denisov G, Dang TC, Hoffmann D, Kerr RA, Zlatic M. 2013 High-throughput analysis of stimulus-evoked behaviors in Drosophila larva reveals multiple modality-specific escape strategies. PLoS ONE 8, e71706. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0071706)
4. Marin AG, Stephens GJ, Louis M. 2011 Active sampling and decision making in Drosophila chemotaxis. Nat. Commun. 2, 441. (doi:10.1038/ncomms1455)
5. Salvador LCM, Bartumeus F, Levin SA, Ryu WS. 2014 Mechanistic analysis of the search behaviour of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131092. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.1092)
6. Yemini E, Jucikas T, Grundy LJ, Brown A, Schafer WR. 2013 A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes. Nat. Methods 10, 877-879. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2560)
7. Stephens GJ, Johnson-Kerner B, Bialek W, Ryu WS. 2008 Dimensionality and dynamics in the behavior of C. elegans. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000028. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028)
8. Fu T-C. 2011 A review on time series data mining. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24, 164-181. (doi:10.1016/j. engappai.2010.09.007)
9. Green CH, Burnet B, Connolly KJ. 1983 Organization and patterns of inter-and intraspecific variation in the behaviour of Drosophila larvae. Anim. Behav. 31, 282-291. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80198-5)
10. Berman GJ, Choi DM, Bialek W, Shaevitz JW. 2014 Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140672. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0672)
11. Brown AE, Yemini EI, Grundy LJ, Jucikas T, Schafer WR. 2013 A dictionary of behavioral motifs reveals clusters of genes affecting Caenorhabditis elegans locomotion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 791-796. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1211447110)
12. Gaffney SJ, Smyth P. 2005 Joint probabilistic curve clustering and alignment. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17 (NIPS 2004). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Gaffney SJ. 2004 Probabilistic curve-aligned clustering and prediction with regression mixture models. PhD thesis, University of California, USA.
14. Schulze A et al. 2015 Dynamical feature extraction at the sensory periphery guides chemotaxis. eLife 4, e06694. (doi:10.7554/eLife.06694)
15. MATLAB. 2014 Version 8.3.0. (R2014a). Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.
16. Jolliffe I. 2002 Principal component analysis. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley Online Library.
17. Verleysen M, François D. 2005 The curse of dimensionality in data mining and time series prediction. In IWANN'05 Proc., Computational Intelligence and Bioinspired Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 8-10 June (eds J Cabestany, A Prieto, F Sandoval), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3512, pp. 758-770. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
18. Schwarz G. 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461-464. (doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136)
19. Fraley C, Raftery AE. 1998 How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Comput. J. 41, 578-588. (doi:10. 1093/comjnl/41.8.578)
20. Konishi S, Kitagawa G. 2008 Information criteria and statistical modeling, pp. 211-237. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
21. Shannon C. 2001 A mathematical theory of communication. ACM Sigmobile Mobile Comput. Commun. Rev. 5, 3-55. (doi:10.1145/584091. 584093)
22. Powers DM. 2011 Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J. Mach. Learn. Technol. 2, 37-63.
23. Huang K-M, Cosman P, Schafer WR. 2006 Machine vision based detection of omega bends and reversals in C. elegans. J. Neurosci. Methods 158, 323-336. (doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.06. 007)
24. Müller M. 2007 Information retrieval for music and motion, pp. 69-84. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25. Botev ZI et al. 2010 Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Ann. Stat. 38, 2916-2957. (doi:10.1214/10-AOS799)
26. Berri S, Boyle JH, Tassieri M, Hope IA, Cohen N. 2009 Forward locomotion of the nematode C. elegans is achieved through modulation of a single gait. HFSP J. 3, 186-193. (doi:10.2976/1. 3082260)
27. Heckscher ES, Lockery SR, Doe CQ. 2012 Characterization of Drosophila larval crawling at the level of organism, segment, and somatic body wall musculature. J. Neurosci. 32, 12 460-12 471. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0222-12.2012)
28. Ohashi S, Morimoto T, Suzuki Y, Miyakawa H, Aonishi T. 2014 A novel behavioral strategy, continuous biased running, during chemotaxis in Drosophila larvae. Neurosci. Lett. 570, 10-15. (doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.04.011)
29. Marin AG, Louis M. 2014 Multilevel control of run orientation in Drosophila larval chemotaxis. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8. (doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00038)
30. Kane EA et al. 2013 Sensorimotor structure of Drosophila larva phototaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E3868-E3877. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1215295110)
31. Gallagher T, Bjorness T, Greene R, You Y-J, Avery L. 2013 The geometry of locomotive behavioral states in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 8, e59865. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059865)
32. Davies A, Louis M, Webb B. In press. A model of Drosophila larvae chemotaxis. PLoS Comput. Biol.
33. Kass RE, Raftery AE. 1995 Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 773-795. (doi:10.1080/01621459.1995. 10476572)
34. Lockery SR. 2011 The computational worm: Spatial orientation and its neuronal basis in C. elegans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 782-790. (doi:10.1016/j. conb.2011.06.009)
35. Rodriguez A, Laio A. 2014 Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344, 1492-1496. (doi:10.1126/science.1242072)
36. Ankerst M, Breunig MM, Kriegel H-P, Sander J. 1999 Optics: Ordering points to identify the clustering structure. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 28, 49-60. From the proceedings of the 1999 ACM Sigmod conference on management of data. (doi:10.1145/304181.304187)