Smartphone speech-to-text applications for communication with profoundly deaf patients

Journal of Laryngology and Otology

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 104-106

  Lyall, F C ^a   Clamp, P J ^b   Hajioff, D ^b  

^a PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell Phones; Cochlear Implantation; Communication AIDS for Disabled; Communication Methods, Total; Persons With Hearing Impairments; Postoperative Care; Speech Recognition Software; Writing

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HANDWRITING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL STUDENT; SPEECH; WRITING; COMMUNICATION AID; DEAFNESS; EVALUATION STUDY; PHYSICIAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SMARTPHONE; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STUDENT; TEXT MESSAGING; TIME FACTOR;

COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; DEAFNESS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMARTPHONE; SPEECH; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; STUDENTS; TEXT MESSAGING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84954078016     PISSN: 00222151     EISSN: 17485460     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215115003151     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ebert DA, Heckerling PS. Communication with deaf patients: knowledge, beliefs and practices of physicians. JAMA 1995; 273:227-9
2. Reeves D, Kokoruwe B. Communication and communication support in primary care: A survey of deaf patients. Audiol Med 2005;3:95-107
3. Middleton A, Turner GH, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Lewis P, Richards M, Clarke A et al. Preferences for communication in clinic from deaf people: A cross-sectional study. J Eval Clin Prac 2010;16:811-17
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance 166: Cochlear Implants for Children and Adults with Severe to Profound Deafness. London: NICE, 2009
5. Hinman RT, Lupton EC, Leeb SB, Avestruz A, Gilmore R, Paul D et al. Using talking lights illumination-based communication networks to enhance word comprehension by people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Am J Audiol 2003;12:17-22
6. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Kessens JM, Vlaming MS, Houtgast T. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise. Ear Hear 2008;29:838-52
7. Klann JG, Szolovits P. An intelligent listening framework for capturing encounter notes from a doctor-patient dialog. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9(suppl 1):S3
8. Issenmann RM, Haffer IH. Use of voice recognition software in an outpatient pediatric specialty practice. Pediatrics 2004;114: 290-3
9. Bottrill ID. The practical application of voice recognition technology in the ENT clinic. Otorhinolaryngologist 2008;2:58-60
10. Fellbaum K, Koroupetroglou G. Principles of electronic speech processing with applications for people with disabilities. Technology and Disability 2008;20:55-85