Visual receptive field properties of neurons in the mouse lateral geniculate nucleus

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Tang, Jiaying ^a   Jimenez, Silvia C Ardila ^a   Chakraborty, Subhojit ^a   Schultz, Simon R ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; LATERAL GENICULATE BODY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; ON OFF PHENOMENON; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RETINA; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CYTOLOGY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GENICULATE BODY; MICROELECTRODE; ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; GENICULATE BODIES; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROELECTRODES; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84954074003     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146017     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962/01/01 ed. 1962;160:106-154. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14449617 PMID: 14449617
2. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH. Thalamic inputs to cytochrome oxidase-rich regions in monkey visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982/10/01 ed. 1982;79:6098-6101. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/6193514 PMID: 6193514
3. Steriade M, McCormick DA, Sejnowski TJ. Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science (80-). 1993/10/29 ed. 1993;262:679-685. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8235588 PMID: 8235588
4. Saalmann YB, Kastner S. Cognitive and perceptual functions of the visual thalamus. Neuron. 2011/07/28 ed. 2011;71:209-223. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron. 2011.06.027 PMID: 21791281
5. Zhang F, Aravanis AM, Adamantidis A, de Lecea L, Deisseroth K. Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007/07/24 ed. 2007;8:577-581. doi: 10. 1038/nrn2192 PMID: 17643087
6. Brecht WJ, Harris FM, Chang S, Tesseur I, Yu GQ, Xu Q, et al. Neuron-specific apolipoprotein e4 proteolysis is associated with increased tau phosphorylation in brains of transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2004/03/12 ed. 2004;24:2527-2534. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4315-03.2004 PMID: 15014128
7. Krahe TE, El-Danaf RN, Dilger EK, Henderson SC, Guido W. Morphologically distinct classes of relay cells exhibit regional preferences in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the mouse. J Neurosci. 2011/12/02 ed. 2011;31:17437-17448. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4370-11.2011 PMID: 22131405
8. Grubb MS, Thompson ID. Quantitative characterization of visual response properties in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 2003/08/29 ed. 2003;90:3594-3607. doi: 10.1152/jn. 00699.2003 PMID: 12944530
9. Marshel JH, Kaye AP, Nauhaus I, Callaway EM. Anterior-posterior direction opponency in the superficial mouse lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuron. 2012/11/28 ed. 2012;76:713-720. doi: 10.1016/j. neuron. 2012.09.021 PMID: 23177957
10. Piscopo DM, El-Danaf RN, Huberman AD, Niell CM. Diverse visual features encoded in mouse lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci. 2013/03/15 ed. 2013;33:4642-4656. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 5187-12.2013 PMID: 23486939
11. Zhao X, Chen H, Liu X, Cang J. Orientation-selective responses in the mouse lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurosci. 2013/08/02 ed. 2013;33:12751-12763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0095-13.2013 PMID: 23904611
12. Paxinos G and Franklin KBJ. Paxinos and Franklin's the Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. São Paulo, Academic Press. 2012.
13. Wang P, Nikolic D. An LCD Monitor with Sufficiently Precise Timing for Research in Vision. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011/09/03 ed. 2011;5:85. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00085 PMID: 21887142
14. Niell CM, Stryker MP. Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2008/07/25 ed. 2008;28:7520-7536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0623-08.2008 PMID: 18650330
15. Cruz-Martin A, El-Danaf RN, Osakada F, Sriram B, Dhande OS, Nguyen PL, et al. A dedicated circuit links direction-selective retinal ganglion cells to the primary visual cortex. Nature. 2014/02/28 ed. 2014;507:358-361. doi: 10.1038/nature12989 PMID: 24572358
16. Baschong W, Suetterlin R, Laeng RH. Control of autofluorescence of archival formaldehyde-fixed, paraffinembedded tissue in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). J Histochem Cytochem. 2001/11/29 ed. 2001;49:1565-1572. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11724904 PMID: 11724904
17. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Hart RT. Three-dimensional reconstruction of normal and early glaucoma monkey optic nerve head connective tissues. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4388-4399. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0022
18. Harris KD, Henze DA, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Buzsaki G. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol. 2000/07/19 ed. 2000;84:401-414. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10899214 PMID: 10899214
19. Rodieck RW. Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vis Res. 1965/12/01 ed. 1965;5:583-601. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5862581 PMID: 5862581
20. So YT, Shapley R. Spatial tuning of cells in and around lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: X and Y relay cells and perigeniculate interneurons. J Neurophysiol. 1981/01/01 ed. 1981;45:107-120. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6259298 PMID: 6259298
21. Albrecht DG, Hamilton DB. Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. J Neurophysiol. 1982/07/01 ed. 1982;48:217-237. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7119846 PMID: 7119846
22. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, Bonds AB. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vis Res. 1991/01/01 ed. 1991;31:1079-1086. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1909826 PMID: 1909826
23. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive Fields and Functional Architecture in Two Nonstriate Visual Areas (18 and 19) of the Cat. J Neurophysiol. 1965/03/01 ed. 1965;28:229-289. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/14283058 PMID: 14283058
24. Rucci M, Edelman GM, Wray J. Modeling LGN responses during free-viewing: a possible role of microscopic eye movements in the refinement of cortical orientation selectivity. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4708-4720. PMID: 10844040
25. Ibbotson MR, Crowder N a, Cloherty SL, Price NSC, Mustari MJ. Saccadic modulation of neural responses: possible roles in saccadic suppression, enhancement, and time compression. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10952-10960. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3950-08.2008 PMID: 18945903
26. Wagor E, Mangini NJ, Pearlman AL. Retinotopic organization of striate and extrastriate visual cortex in the mouse. J Comp Neurol. 1980/09/01 ed. 1980;193:187-202. doi: 10.1002/cne.901930113 PMID: 6776164
27. Metin C, Godement P, Imbert M. The primary visual cortex in the mouse: receptive field properties and functional organization. Exp Brain Res. 1988/01/01 ed. 1988;69:594-612. Available: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3371440 PMID: 3371440
28. Chalupa, LM and Williams R. Eye, Retina, and Visual System of the Mouse. Cambridge, MA; 2008.
29. Tailby C, Solomon SG, Peirce JW, Metha AB. Two expressions of "surround suppression" in V1 that arise independent of cortical mechanisms of suppression. Vis Neurosci. 2007/04/14 ed. 2007;24:99-109. doi: 10.1017/S0952523807070022 PMID: 17430613
30. Rodieck RW. Receptive fields in the cat retina: a new type. Science (80-). 1967/07/07 ed. 1967;157:90-92. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6026674 PMID: 6026674
31. Niell CM, Stryker MP. Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex. Neuron. 2010/03/02 ed. 2010;65:472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron. 2010.01.033 PMID: 20188652
32. Schmitzer-Torbert N, Jackson J, Henze D, Harris K, Redish AD. Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings. Neuroscience. 2005/02/01 ed. 2005;131:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j. neuroscience.2004.09.066 PMID: 15680687
33. Xu X, Ichida JM, Allison JD, Boyd JD, Bonds AB, Casagrande VA. A comparison of koniocellular, magnocellular and parvocellular receptive field properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J Physiol. 2001/02/17 ed. 2001;531:203-218. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/11179404 PMID: 11179404
34. Foster KH, Gaska JP, Nagler M, Pollen DA. Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. J Physiol. 1985/08/01 ed. 1985;365:331-363. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4032318 PMID: 4032318
35. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol. 1978/10/01 ed. 1978;283:53-77. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/722589 PMID: 722589
36. van Alphen B, Winkelman BH, Frens MA. Age- and sex-related differences in contrast sensitivity in C57BL/6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009/01/02 ed. 2009;50:2451-2458. 10.1167/iovs.08-2594 doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2594 PMID: 19117934
37. Solomon SG, White AJ, Martin PR. Temporal contrast sensitivity in the lateral geniculate nucleus of a New World monkey, the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. J Physiol. 1999/06/08 ed. 1999;517 (Pt 3:907-917. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10358129 PMID: 10358129
38. Cheong SK, Tailby C, Solomon SG, Martin PR. Cortical-like receptive fields in the lateral geniculate nucleus of marmoset monkeys. J Neurosci. 2013/04/19 ed. 2013;33:6864-6876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5208-12.2013 PMID: 23595745
39. Kim IJ, Zhang Y, Meister M, Sanes JR. Laminar restriction of retinal ganglion cell dendrites and axons: subtype-specific developmental patterns revealed with transgenic markers. J Neurosci. 2010/01/29 ed. 2010;30:1452-1462. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4779-09.2010 PMID: 20107072
40. Kim IJ, Zhang Y, Yamagata M, Meister M, Sanes JR. Molecular identification of a retinal cell type that responds to upward motion. Nature. 2008/03/28 ed. 2008;452:478-482. doi: 10.1038/nature06739 PMID: 18368118
41. Huberman AD, Manu M, Koch SM, Susman MW, Lutz AB, Ullian EM, et al. Architecture and activitymediated refinement of axonal projections from a mosaic of genetically identified retinal ganglion cells. Neuron. 2008/08/15 ed. 2008;59:425-438. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron. 2008.07.018 PMID: 18701068
42. Huberman AD, Wei W, Elstrott J, Stafford BK, Feller MB, Barres BA. Genetic identification of an On-Off direction-selective retinal ganglion cell subtype reveals a layer-specific subcortical map of posterior motion. Neuron. 2009/05/19 ed. 2009;62:327-334. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron. 2009.04.014 PMID: 19447089
43. Ahmed B, Anderson JC, Douglas RJ, Martin KA, Nelson JC. Polyneuronal innervation of spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1994/03/01 ed. 1994;341:39-49. doi: 10.1002/cne. 903410105 PMID: 8006222
44. Latawiec D, Martin KA, Meskenaite V. Termination of the geniculocortical projection in the striate cortex of macaque monkey: a quantitative immunoelectron microscopic study. J Comp Neurol. 2000/03/21 ed. 2000;419:306-319. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10723007 PMID: 10723007
45. Scholl B, Tan AY, Corey J, Priebe NJ. Emergence of orientation selectivity in the Mammalian visual pathway. J Neurosci. 2013/06/28 ed. 2013;33:10616-10624. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0404-13. 2013 PMID: 23804085
46. Wang L, Sarnaik R, Rangarajan K, Liu X, Cang J. Visual receptive field properties of neurons in the superficial superior colliculus of the mouse. J Neurosci. 2010/12/15 ed. 2010;30:16573-16584. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3305-10.2010 PMID: 21147997
47. Sherman SM, Guillery RW. On the actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing "drivers" from "modulators." Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998/06/17 ed. 1998;95:7121-7126. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9618549 PMID: 9618549
48. Sherman SM, Guillery RW. Distinct functions for direct and transthalamic corticocortical connections. J Neurophysiol. 2011/06/17 ed. 2011;106:1068-1077. doi: 10.1152/jn. 00429.2011 PMID: 21676936
49. Sincich LC, Adams DL, Economides JR, Horton JC. Transmission of spike trains at the retinogeniculate synapse. J Neurosci. 2007/03/09 ed. 2007;27:2683-2692. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5077-06.2007 PMID: 17344406
50. Rochefort NL, Narushima M, Grienberger C, Marandi N, Hill DN, Konnerth A. Development of direction selectivity in mouse cortical neurons. Neuron. 2011/08/13 ed. 2011;71:425-432. doi: 10.1016/j. neuron. 2011.06.013 PMID: 21835340
51. Lemmens MA, Steinbusch HW, Rutten BP, Schmitz C. Advanced microscopy techniques for quantitative analysis in neuromorphology and neuropathology research: current status and requirements for the future. J Chem Neuroanat. 2010/07/06 ed. 2010;40:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2010.06. 005 PMID: 20600825
52. Truong T V, Supatto W, Koos DS, Choi JM, Fraser SE. Deep and fast live imaging with two-photon scanned light-sheet microscopy. Nat Methods. 2011/07/19 ed. 2011;8:757-760. doi: 10.1038/nmeth. 1652 PMID: 21765409
53. Maheswaran S, Barjat H, Bate ST, Aljabar P, Hill DL, Tilling L, et al. Analysis of serial magnetic resonance images of mouse brains using image registration. Neuroimage. 2008/11/19 ed. 2009;44:692-700. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.016 PMID: 19015039
54. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006/03/21 ed. 2006;31:1116-1128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 PMID: 16545965
55. Swadlow HA, Weyand TG. Receptive-field and axonal properties of neurons in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of awake unparalyzed rabbits. J Neurophysiol. 1985/07/01 ed. 1985;54:168-183. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2993538 PMID: 2993538