Sparse representation of ultrasonic guided-waves for robust damage detection in pipelines under varying environmental and operational conditions

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 369-391

  Eybpoosh, Matineh ^a   Berges, Mario ^a   Noh, Hae Young ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

damage detection; online monitoring; pipeline monitoring; sparse representation; structural health monitoring; ultrasonic guided waves

Indexed keywords

CRACK DETECTION; GUIDED ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE PROPAGATION; PIPELINES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; ULTRASONIC WAVES; WATER SUPPLY;

DAMAGE-SENSITIVE FEATURES; LABELED TRAINING DATA; LABORATORY AND FIELD EXPERIMENTS; ONLINE MONITORING; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; PIPELINE MONITORING; SPARSE REPRESENTATION; ULTRASONIC GUIDED WAVE;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 84954058696     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1776     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. PHMSA, 'Pipeline Incident 20 Year Trend', US DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
2. PHMSA, 'Leak Detection Study', US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, DTPH56-11-D-000001, Dec. 2012.
3. Karion A, Sweeney C, Pétron G, Frost G, Michael Hardesty R, Kofler J, Miller BR, Newberger T, Wolter S, Banta R, Brewer A, Dlugokencky E, Lang P, Montzka SA, Schnell R, Tans P, Trainer M, Zamora R, Conley S,. Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field. Geophysical Research Letters 2013; 40 (16): 4393-4397.
4. EPA, Distribution system inventory, integrity and water quality| US EPA, 2007.
5. Shinozuka M, Chou PH, Kim S, Kim H, Karmakar D, Lu F,. Non-invasive acceleration-based methodology for damage detection and assessment of water distribution system. Smart Struct. Syst. 2010; 6 (5-6): 545-559.
6. Cawley P, Lowe M, Alleyne DN, Pavlakovic B, Wilcox PD,. Practical long range guided wave inspection-applications to pipes and rail. Materials Evaluation 2003; 61 (1): 66-74.
7. Alleyne DN, Pavlakovic B, Lowe MJS, Cawley P,. Rapid, long range inspection of chemical plant pipework using guided waves. AIP Conference Proceedings 2001; 557 (1): 180.
8. Siqueira MHS, Gatts CEN, da Silva RR, Rebello JMA,. The use of ultrasonic guided waves and wavelets analysis in pipe inspection. Ultrasonics 2004; 41 (10): 785-797.
9. Sun Z, Mao Y, Jiang W, Zhang D,. ' Investigation on interaction of Lamb waves and circumferential notch in pipe by means of wavelet transform ', in 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2000; 1: 827-830.
10. Wang X, Tse PW, Mechefske CK, Hua M,. Experimental investigation of reflection in guided wave-based inspection for the characterization of pipeline defects. NDT E Int. 2010; 43 (4): 365-374.
11. Rose JL,. Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2004.
12. Vanlanduit S, Parloo E, Cauberghe B, Guillaume P, Verboven P,. A robust singular value decomposition for damage detection under changing operating conditions and structural uncertainties. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2005; 284 (3-5): 1033-1050.
13. Davies J, Cawley P, Lowe MJS,. ' Long range guided wave pipe inspection-the advantages of focusing ', presented at the 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Shanghai, China, 2008.
14. Demma A, Cawley P, Lowe M, Roosenbrand AG,. The reflection of the fundamental torsional mode from cracks and notches in pipes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003; 114 (2): 611-625.
15. Shull PJ,. Nondestructive Evaluation: Theory, Techniques, and Applications. CRC Press: New York, 2002.
16. Eybpoosh M, Bergés M, Noh HY,. ' Nonlinear feature extraction methods for removing temperature effects in multi-mode guided-waves in pipes ', in SPIE Smart Structures/NDE, San Diego, California, United States, 2015.
17. Croxford AJ, Moll J, Wilcox PD, Michaels JE,. Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring. Ultrasonics 2010; 50 (4-5): 517-528.
18. Lu Y, Michaels JE,. A methodology for structural health monitoring with diffuse ultrasonic waves in the presence of temperature variations. Ultrasonics 2005; 43 (9): 717-731.
19. Eybpoosh M, Bergés M, Noh HY,. ' Toward characterizing the effects of environmental and operational conditions on diffuse-field ultrasonic guided-waves in pipes ', in SPIE Smart Structures/NDE, San Diego, California, United States, 2014.
20. Demma A, Cawley P, Lowe M, Roosenbrand AG, Pavlakovic B,. The reflection of guided waves from notches in pipes: a guide for interpreting corrosion measurements. NDT E Int. 2004; 37 (3): 167-180.
21. Alleyne DN, Lowe MJS, Cawley P,. The reflection of guided waves from circumferential notches in pipes. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1998; 65 (3): 635-641.
22. Lowe MJS, Alleyne DN, Cawley P,. The mode conversion of a guided wave by a part-circumferential notch in a pipe. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1998; 65 (3): 649-656.
23. Løvstad A, Cawley P,. The reflection of the fundamental torsional mode from pit clusters in pipes. NDT E Int. 2012; 46: 83-93.
24. Nurmalia, Nakamura N, Ogi H, Hirao M,. Mode conversion and total reflection of torsional waves for pipe inspection. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 2013; 52 (7S): 07HC14.
25. Aristégui C, Lowe MJS, Cawley P,. Guided waves in fluid-filled pipes surrounded by different fluids. Ultrasonics 2001; 39 (5): 367-375.
26. Croxford AJ, Wilcox PD, Konstantinidis G, Drinkwater BW,. ' Strategies for overcoming the effect of temperature on guided wave structural health monitoring ', in SPIE, 2007; 6532: 65321T-1.
27. di Scalea FL, Salamone S,. Temperature effects in ultrasonic Lamb wave structural health monitoring systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008; 124 (1): 161-174.
28. Schulz MJ, Sundaresan MJ, Mcmichael J, Clayton D, Sadler R, Nagel B,. Piezoelectric materials at elevated temperature. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2003; 14 (11): 693-705.
29. Clarke T, Cawley P, Wilcox PD, Croxford AJ,. Evaluation of the damage detection capability of a sparse-array guided-wave SHM system applied to a complex structure under varying thermal conditions. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 2009; 56 (12): 2666-2678.
30. Harley JB, Ying Y, Moura JMF, Oppenheim IJ, Sobelman L, Garrett JH,. Application of Mellin transform features for robust ultrasonic guided wave structural health monitoring. AIP Conference Proceedings 2012; 1430 (1): 1551-1558.
31. Degtyar AD, Huang W, Rokhlin SI,. Wave propagation in stressed composites. In Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Thompson DO, Chimenti DE, (eds). Springer: US, 1996; 1669-1676.
32. Eybpoosh M, Bergés M, Noh HY,. ' Investigation on the effects of environmental and operational conditions (EOC) on diffuse-field ultrasonic guided-waves in pipes ', in International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Orlando, FL, 2014.
33. Tse PW, Wang X,. Characterization of pipeline defect in guided-waves based inspection through matching pursuit with the optimized dictionary. NDT E Int. 2013; 54: 171-182.
34. Niethammer M, Jacobs LJ, Qu J, Jarzynski J,. Time-frequency representation of Lamb waves using the reassigned spectrogram. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000; 107 (5): L19-L24.
35. Guerrero-Mosquera C, Trigueros AM, Franco JI, Navia-Vázquez Á,. New feature extraction approach for epileptic EEG signal detection using time-frequency distributions. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2010; 48 (4): 321-330.
36. Belouchrani A, Amin MG,. Blind source separation based on time-frequency signal representations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1998; 46 (11): 2888-2897.
37. Cohen L,. Time-frequency distributions-a review. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989; 77 (7): 941-981.
38. Harley JB, Moura JMF,. Sparse recovery of the multimodal and dispersive characteristics of Lamb waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013; 133 (5): 2732-2745.
39. Harley JB, Moura JMF,. ' Broadband localization in a dispersive medium through sparse wavenumber analysis ', in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013, pp. 4071-4075.
40. Harley JB, Moura JMF,. Data-driven matched field processing for Lamb wave structural health monitoring. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2014; 135 (3): 1231-1244.
41. Liu C, Harley J, O'Donoughue N, Ying Y, Altschul MH, Garrett JH, Moura JMF, Oppenheim IJ, Soibelman L,. Ultrasonic monitoring of a pipe under operating conditions. International Society for Optics and Photonics 2012; 83450B-83450B.
42. Long R, Cawley P, Lowe M,. Acoustic wave propagation in buried iron water pipes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2003; 459 (2039): 2749-2770.
43. Liu C, Harley J, O'Donoughue N., Ying Y, Altschul MH, Berges M, Garrett JH, Greve DW, Moura JMF, Oppenheim IJ, Soibelman L,. ' Robust change detection in highly dynamic guided wave signals with singular value decomposition ', in Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2012 IEEE International, 2012; 483-486.
44. Lu Y, Michaels JE,. Feature extraction and sensor fusion for ultrasonic structural health monitoring under changing environmental conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2009; 9 (11): 1462-1471.
45. Ying Y, Garrett J, Harley J, Oppenheim I, Shi J, Soibelman L,. Damage detection in pipes under changing environmental conditions using embedded piezoelectric transducers and pattern recognition techniques. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice 2013; 4 (1): 17-23.
46. Pierce AD, Kil H-G,. Elastic wave propagation from point excitations on thin-walled cylindrical shells. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 1990; 112 (3): 399-406.
47. Dehghan-Niri E, Salamone S,. A multi-helical ultrasonic imaging approach for the structural health monitoring of cylindrical structures. Structural Health Monitoring, 2014; 1475921714548937.
48. Nagy PB, Simonetti F, Instanes G,. Corrosion and erosion monitoring in plates and pipes using constant group velocity Lamb wave inspection. Ultrasonics 2014; 54 (7): 1832-1841.
49. Belanger P, Cawley P,. Feasibility of low frequency straight-ray guided wave tomography. NDT E Int. 2009; 42 (2): 113-119.
50. Huang K, Aviyente S,. ' Sparse representation for signal classification ', in In Adv. NIPS, 2006.
51. Donoho DL, Huo X,. Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2001; 47 (7): 2845-2862.
52. Grant MC, Boyd SP,. Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs. In Recent Advances in Learning and Control, Blondel VD, Boyd SP, Kimura H, (eds). Springer: London, 2008; 95-110.
53. Lefebvre F, Deblock Y, Campistron P, Ahite D, Fabre JJ,. Development of a new ultrasonic technique for bone and biomaterials in vitro characterization. Journal of Biomedial Materials Research 2002; 63 (4): 441-446.
54. Protopappas VC, Fotiadis DI, Malizos KN,. Guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2006; 32 (5): 693-708.
55. Seco F, Jiménez A,. ' Modelling the generation and propagation of ultrasonic signals in cylindrical waveguides ', in Ultrasonic waves, 2012; 1-28.
56. Liu C, Harley JB, Ying Y, Oppenheim IJ, Bergés M, Greve DW, Garrett JH,. Singular value decomposition for novelty detection in ultrasonic pipe monitoring. 2013; 8692: 86921R-86921R-11.
57. Chang Liu JBH,. Ultrasonic monitoring of a pressurized pipe in operation. 2013; 1903-1913.