The Effect of Response Bias on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 51-61

  McGee Ng, Sarah A ^a   Bagby, R Michael ^a   Goodwin, Brandee E ^b   Burchett, Danielle ^c   Sellbom, Martin ^c   Ayearst, Lindsay E ^a   Dhillon, Sonya ^a   Yiu, Shirley ^a   Ben Porath, Yossef S ^d   Baker, Spencer ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e HAMPTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY TEST; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MMPI; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84954028457     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1096791     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (in press). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Development. (2013). Personality trait facet and domain scoring: The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)-Adult. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures#Personality
5. Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L. Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 Section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory -2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 801-815.
6. Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286-294.
7. Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Wygant, D. B., Salekin, R. T., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Examining the associations between DSM-5 Section III antisocial personality disorder traits and psychopathy in community and university samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 675-697.
8. Anderson, J., Snider, S., Sellbom, M., Krueger, R., & Hopwood, C. (2014). A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures. Psychiatry Research, 216, 363-372. doi:10.1016/j. psychres.2014.01.007
9. Baer, R. A., & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 16.
10. Bagby, R. M. (Ed.). (2013). Special issue on the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Assessment, 20, 267-268.
11. Bagby, R. M., & Marshall, M. B. (2003). Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs. Psychological Assessment, 15, 333-339.
12. Bagby, R. M., & Marshall, M. B. (2004). Assessing underreporting response bias on the MMPI-2. Assessment, 11, 115-126.
13. Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2011). MMPI-2-RF manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 2008)
15. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2014, April). An introduction to the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured form). Presentation at the MMPI-2, MMPI-2-RF, MMPI-A Workshops and Symposium, Scottsdale, AZ.
16. Burchett, D. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2014). Multimethod assessment of response distortion: Integrating data from interviews, collateral records, and standardized assessment tools. In C. J. Hopwood & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Multimethod clinical assessment (pp. 345-378). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. Burchett, D. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2010). The impact of overreporting on MMPI-2-RF substantive scale score validity. Assessment, 17, 497-516.
18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Dhillon, S., & Bagby, R. M. (2015, August). The retest reliability of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON, Canada.
20. Edwards, A. L. (1957). Social desirability and the probability of endorsement of items in the interpersonal check list. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 394-396.
21. First, M. B. (2005). Clinical utility: A prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 560.
22. Forbey, J. D., & Lee, T. T. C. (2011). An exploration of the impact of invalid MMPI-2 protocols on collateral self-report measure scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 556-565.
23. Forbey, J. D., Lee, T. T. C., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., & Gartland, D. (2013). Associations between MMPI-2-RF validity scale scores and extra-test measures of personality and psychopathology. Assessment, 20, 448-461.
24. Goodwin, B. E., Sellbom, M., & Arbisi, P. A. (2013). Posttraumatic stress disorder in veterans: The utility of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales in detecting overreported symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 25, 671.
25. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
26. Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2013). Connecting DSM-5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 162-172.
27. Hopwood, C. J., & Sellbom, M. S. (2013). Implications of DSM-5 personality traits for forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and the Law, 6, 314-323.
28. Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., Krueger, R. F., Schade, N., Markon, K. E., & Morey, L. C. (2013). DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 20, 269-285.
29. Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. (1962). Response styles on the MMPI: Comparisons of clinical and normative samples. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 285-299.
30. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 25, 1879-1890.
31. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5)-Adult (Full version). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
32. Krueger, R. F., Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2014). DSM-5 and the path toward empirically based and clinically useful conceptualization of personality and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 245-261.
33. Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477-501.
34. Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R.M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20, 370-383.
35. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
36. McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450-470.
37. Millon, T., Millon, C., Davis, R., & Grossman, S. (2009). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Education.
38. Morey, L. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
39. Morey, L. C. (2012). Detection of response bias in applied assessment: Comment on McGrath et al. (2010). Psychological Injury and the Law, 5, 153-161.
40. Paris, J. (2014). Modernity and narcissistic personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 220-226.
41. Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B.G., & Bagby, R.M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APADSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20, 362-369.
42. Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2012). Evaluation of malingering and related response styles. In I. B. Weiner & R. K. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 517-540). New York, NY: Wiley.
43. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10, 160-177.
44. Rohling, M. L., Larrabee, G. J., Griffenstein, M. F., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Lees-Haley, P., Green, P., & Greve, K. W. (2011). A missing review of response bias: Comment on McGrath, Mitchell, Kim, and Hough (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 708-712.
45. Sellbom, M., Anderson, J. L., & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI-2-RF. Assessment, 20, 709-722.
46. Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) L-r and K-r scales in detecting underreporting in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 20, 370-376.
47. Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2010). Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI-2 RF form validity scales. Psychological Assessment, 22, 757-767.
48. Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S (2008). MMPI-2-RF technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
49. Widiger, T. A., & Lowe, J. R. (2007). Five-factor model assessment of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 16-29.
50. Wiggins, C. W., Wygant, D. B., Hoelzle, J. B., & Gervais, R. O. (2012). The more you say the less it means: Overreporting and attenuated criterion validity in a forensic disability sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 162-173.
51. Wiggins, J. S. (1959). Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419-427.
52. Wright, A. G. C., Calabrese, W. R., Rudick, M. M., Yam, W. H., Zelazny, K., Williams, T. F., ⋯ Simms, L. J. (2015). Stability of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality traits and their longitudinal associations with psychosocial functioning in personality disordered individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 199-207.
53. Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(1), 43-54.
54. Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957.