R Letters: A web-based application for text analysis of journal articles

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Pence, Charles H ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; SCIENTIST; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DATA MINING; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; SOFTWARE;

DATA MINING; INTERNET; MANUSCRIPTS AS TOPIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84953896625     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Orduña-Malea E, Ayllón JM, Martín Martín A, López Cózar ED (2014) About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers. EC3 Working Papers 18 arXiv:1407.6239 [cs].
2. Larsen PO, von Ins M (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 84: 575-603. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z PMID: 20700371
3. Nature Chemistry Editorial Board (2011) Keeping up with the journals. Nature Chemistry 3: 649. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1141 PMID: 21860434
4. Rockwell G (2006) TAPoR: Building a portal for text analysis. In: Siemens R, Moorman D, editors, Mind technologies: humanities computing and the Canadian academic community, Calgary: University of Calgary Press. pp. 285-289.
5. Kumar A (2009) MONK project: architecture overview. In: JCDL'09. Austin, TX: ACM.
6. Ide N, Véronis J, editors (1995) Text encoding initiative: background and context. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Brants T, Franz A (2006) The Google Web 1T 5-gram Corpus Version 1.1 (LDC2006T13). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
8. Burns J, Brenner A, Kiser K, Krot M, Llewellyn C, et al. (2009) JSTOR-Data for Research. In: Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Berlin: Springer, number 5714 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 416-419.
9. Ashton AT (2011) Semantically rich tools for text exploration: TEI and SEASR. In: Digital Humanities 2011. Stanford, CA, pp. 270-271.
10. Tsukamoto S (2002) KWIC Concordance for Windows: easy access to corpora. In: Saito T, Nakamura J, Yamazaki S, editors, Language and computers, English corpus linguistics in Japan, Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 327-340.
11. He Q (1999) Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 48: 133-159.
12. nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Baltimore, MD: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 55-60.
13. Burrows JF (2006) All the way through: testing for authorship in different frequency strata. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22: 27-47. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqi067
14. Craig H, Kinney AF (2009) Shakespare, computers, and the mystery of authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Manning CD, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. Apache Software Foundation (2014). Apache Solr. URL https://lucene.apache.org/solr/.
17. Roberts RJ (2001) PubMed Central: The GenBank of the published literature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 381-382. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.381
18. Beck J (2011) NISO Z39.96: The Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS): What happened to the NLM DTDs? Journal of Electronic Publishing 14. doi: 10.3998/3336451.0014.106 PMID: 22140303
19. Elsevier (2014). Text and Data Mining. URL https://www.elsevier.com/about/company-information/ policies/text-and-data-mining.