On the consequences of purging and linkage on fitness and genetic diversity

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 171-181

  Bersabé, Diego ^a   Caballero, Armando ^b   Pérez Figueroa, Andrés ^b   García Dorado, Aurora ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Associative overdominance; Genetic diversity; Inbreeding depression; inbreeding load

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOMOZYGOTE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PEDIGREE; POPULATION SIZE; PREDICTION; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ALGORITHMS; ALLELES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84953791821     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.023184     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ballou, J. D., and R. C. Lacy, 1995 Identifying genetically important indi- viduals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations, pp. 76-111 in Population Management for Survival & Recovery. Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation, edited by J. D. Ballou, M. Gilpin, and T. J. Foose. Columbia University Press, New York.
2. Barton, N. H., and S. P. Otto, 2005 Evolution of recombination due to random drift. Genetics 169: 2353-2370.
3. Bersabé, D., and A. García-Dorado, 2013 On the genetic parameter deter- mining the efficiency of purging: an estimate for Drosophila egg-to-pupae viability. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 375-385.
4. Bierne, N., A. Tsitrone, and P. David, 2000 An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck. Genetics 155: 1981-1990.
5. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura, 1970 An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.
6. Charlesworth, B., 2012 The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites. Genetics 190: 5-22.
7. Demontis, D., C. Pertoldi, V. Loeschcke, K. Mikkelsen, T. Axelsson et al., 2009 Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide poly- morphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 18: 4551-4563.
8. Emik, L. O., and C. E. Terrill, 1949 Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40: 51-55.
9. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. Mackay, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Ge- netics, Ed. 4. Longman, London.
10. Fernández, J., M. Toro, and A. Caballero, 2003 Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. Genetics 165: 885-894.
11. Frankham, R., C. J. Bradshaw, and B. W. Brook, 2014 Genetics in conser- vation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol. Conserv. 170: 56-63.
12. Franklin, I. R., 1980 Evolutionary change in small populations, pp. 135-149 in Conservation Biology: an Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
13. Franklin, I. R., F. W. Allendorf, and I. G. Jamieson, 2014 The 50/500 rule is still valid-reply to Frankham et al. Biol. Conserv. 176: 284-285.
14. García-Dorado, A., 2007 Shortcut predictions for fitness properties at the mutation-selection-drift balance and for its buildup after size reduction under different management strategies. Genetics 176: 983-997.
15. García-Dorado, A., 2012 Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard se- lection. Genetics 190: 1461-1476.
16. García-Dorado, A., 2015 On the consequences of ignoring purging on ge- netic recommendations for minimum viable population rules. Heredity. 115: 185-187.
17. Gilligan, D. M., D. A. Briscoe, and R. Frankham, 2005 Comparative losses of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 85: 47-55.
18. Glémin, S., 2003 How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift vs. non- random mating. Evolution 57: 2678-2687.
19. Haldane, J. B. S., 1919 The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. J. Genet. 8: 299-309
20. Hedrick, P. W., and S. T. Kalinowski, 2000 Inbreeding depression in con- servation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 139-162.
21. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson, 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269-294.
22. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson, 1968 Linkage disequilibrium in finite pop- ulations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 38: 226-231.
23. Jamieson, I. G., and F. W. Allendorf, 2012 How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs? Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 578-584.
24. Latter, B., J. Mulley, D. Reid, and L. Pascoe, 1995 Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 287-297.
25. Leberg, P. L., and B. D. Firmin, 2008 Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol. Ecol. 17: 334-343.
26. Morton, N. E., J. F. Crow, and H. J. Muller, 1956 An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 42: 855.
27. Nordborg, M., B. Charlesworth, and D. Charlesworth, 1996 The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet. Res. 67: 159-174.
28. Ohta, T., 1971 Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet. Res. 18: 277-286.
29. Pálsson, S., and P. Pamilo, 1999 The effects of deleterious mutations on linked, neutral variation in small populations. Genetics 153: 475-483.
30. Pérez-Figueroa, A., A. Caballero, A. García-Dorado, and C. Lopez-Fanjul, 2009 The action of purifying selection, mutation and drift on fitness epistatic systems. Genetics 183: 299-313.
31. Rumball, W., I. Franklin, R. Frankham, and B. Sheldon, 1994 Decline in heterozygosity under full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Dro- sophila melanogaster. Genetics 136: 1039-1049.
32. Santiago, E., and A. Caballero, 1998 Effective size and polymorphism of linked neutral loci in populations under directional selection. Genetics 149: 2105-2117.
33. Sonesson, A. K., and T. H. Meuwissen, 2002 Non-random mating for se- lection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34: 23-40.
34. Turissini, D. A., S. Gamez, and B. J. White, 2014 Genome-wide patterns of polymorphism in an inbred line of the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Genome Biol. Evol. 6: 3094-3104.
35. Wang, J., and W. G. Hill, 1999 Effect of selection against deleterious mu- tations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely in- breeding populations. Genetics 153: 1475-1489.
36. Wang, J., W. G. Hill, D. Charlesworth, and B. Charlesworth, 1999 Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet. Res. 74: 165-178.
37. Wright, S., 1931 Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97.