On the genetic parameter determining the efficiency of purging: An estimate for Drosophila egg-to-pupae viability

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 375-385

  Bersabe D ^a   Garcia Dorado A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bottlenecked population; Conservation; Effective population size; Inbreeding depression; Purge; Reduced population

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EGG; EXCRETION; FITNESS; FLY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; VIABILITY;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; INSECT; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; INBREEDING; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; OVUM; PUPA;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84872595189     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12054     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amador, C., García-Dorado, A., Bersabé, D. & López-Fanjul, C. 2010. Regeneration of the variance of metric traits by spontaneous mutation in a Drosophila population. Genet. Res. 92: 91-102.
2. Ávila, V., Amador, C. & García-Dorado, A. 2010. The purge of genetic load through restricted panmixia in a Drosophila experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1937-1946.
3. Boakes, E. & Wang, J. 2005. A simulation study on detecting purging of inbreeding depression in captive populations. Genet. Res. 86: 139-148.
4. Boakes, E.H., Wang, J. & Amos, W. 2007. An investigation of inbreeding depression and purging in captive pedigreed populations. Heredity 98: 172-182.
5. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
6. Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J.H. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 783-796.
7. Crnokrak, P. & Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347-2358.
8. Crow, J.F. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9: 3-42.
9. Deák, P., Omar, M.M., Saunders, R.D.C., Pál, M., Komonyi, O., Szidonya, J. et al. 1997. P-Element insertion alleles of essential genes on the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: correlation of physical and cytogenetic maps in chromosomal region 86E-87F. Genetics 147: 1697-1722.
10. Eanes, W.F., Hey, J. & Houle, D. 1985. Homozygous and hemizygous viability variation on the X chromosome. Genetics 111: 831-844.
11. Frankham, R. 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126: 131-140.
12. García, N., López-Fanjul, C. & García-Dorado, A. 1994. The genetics of viability in Drosophila melanogaster: effects of inbreeding and artificial selection. Evolution 48: 1277-1285.
13. García-Dorado, A. 2003. Tolerant versus sensitive genomes: the impact of deleterious mutation on fitness and conservation. Conserv. Genet. 4: 311-324.
14. García-Dorado, A. 2012. Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation and standard selection. Genetics 190: 1461-1476.
15. Glémin, S. 2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57: 2678-2687.
16. Guillaume, F. & Perrin, N. 2006. Joint evolution of dispersal and inbreeding load. Genetics 173: 497-509.
17. Hedrick, P.W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363-372.
18. Kusakabe, S. & Mukai, T. 1984. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XVII. A population carrying genetic variability explainable by the classical hypothesis. Genetics 108: 393-408.
19. Kusakabe, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Baba, H. & Mukai, T. 2000. The genetic structure of the Raleigh natural population of Drosophila melanogaster revisited. Genetics 154: 679-685.
20. Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
21. Latter, B.D.H., Mulley, J.C., Reid, D. & Pascoe, L. 1995. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 287-297.
22. Leberg, P.L. & Firmin, B.D. 2008. Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol. Ecol. 17: 334-343.
23. Lindsley, D.L. & Zimm, G.G. 1992 The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
24. López-Fanjul, C. & Villaverde, A. 1989. Inbreeding increases genetic variance for viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 43: 1800-1804.
25. Mallet, M.A. & Chippindale, A.K. 2011. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females. Heredity 106: 994-1002.
26. Mukai, T. & Nagano, S. 1983. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XVI. Excess of additive genetic variance of viability. Genetics 105: 115-134.
27. Mukai, T. & Yamaguchi, O. 1974. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population. Genetics 76: 339-366.
28. Pedersen, K.S., Kristensen, T.N. & Loeschcke, V. 2005. Effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster - Hsp70 expression and fitness. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 756-762.
29. Pekkala, N., Emily Knott, K., Kotiaho, J.S. & Puurtinen, M. 2012. Inbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations. Ecol. Evol. 2: 1791-1804.
30. Perrimon, N., Engstrom, L. & Mahowald, A.P. 1989. Zygotic lethals with specific maternal effect phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Loci on the X Chromosome. Genetics 121: 333-352.
31. Ripoll, P. 1977. Behavior of somatic cells homozygous for zygotic lethals in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 86: 357-376.
32. Rosa, J.M., Camacho, S. & García-Dorado, A. 2005. A measure of the within-chromosome synergistic epistasis for Drosophila viability. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1130-1137.
33. Sánchez-Molano, E. & García-Dorado, A. 2011. The consequences on fitness of equating family contributions: inferences from a Drosophila experiment. Conserv. Genet. 12: 343-353.
34. Shearn, A., Rice, T., Garen, A. & Gehring, W. 1971. Imaginal discs abnormalities in lethal mutants of Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68: 2594-2598.
35. Swindell, W.R. & Bouzat, J.L. 2006. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1257-1264.
36. Temin, R.G., Meyer, H.U., Dawson, P.S. & Crow, J.F. 1969. The influence of epistasis on homozygous viability depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61: 497-519.
37. Török, T., Tick, G., Alvarado, M. & Kiss, I. 1993. P-lacW insertional mutagenesis on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: isolation of lethals with different overgrowth phenotypes. Genetics 135: 71-80.
38. Wang, J. & Hill, W.G. 1999. Effect of selection against deleterious mutations on the decline in heterozygosity at neutral loci in closely inbreeding populations. Genetics 153: 1475-1489.
39. Wang, J., Hill, W.G., Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet. Res. 74: 165-178.