Fabrication and characterization of nanostructure diopside scaffolds using the space holder method: Effect of different space holders and compaction pressures

Materials and Design

Volumn 91, Issue , 2016, Pages 193-200

  Ghomi, Hamed ^a   Emadi, Rahmatollah ^a   Javanmard, Shaghayegh Haghjooye ^b  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Biomedical applications; Diopside; Mechanical properties; Porosity; Scaffold; Space holder technique

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FABRICATION; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NANOSTRUCTURES; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; PORE SIZE; POROSITY; SCAFFOLDS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; DIOPSIDE; FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATIONS; PORE INTERCONNECTIVITY; SIMULATED BODY FLUIDS; SPACE-HOLDER TECHNIQUES; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

EID: 84953449932     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.078     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. 16) scaffold with biomimetic apatite layer for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2007, 18:857-864.
2. 2) bioactive glass. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2013, 380:17-24.
3. Wu C.h., Chang J. Degradation, bioactivity, and cytocompatibility of diopside, akermanite, and bredigite ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2007, 83:153-160.
4. Feng P., Guo X., Gao C., Gao D., Xiao T., Shuai X., Shuai C. Diopside modified porous polyglycolide scaffolds with improved properties. RSC Advances 2015, 5:54822-54829.
5. Diba M., Goudouri O.M., Tapia F., Boccaccini A.R. Magnesium-containing bioactive polycrystalline silicate-based ceramics and glass-ceramics for biomedical applications. Curr. Opinion Solid State Mater. Sci. 2014, 18:147-167.
6. Ghomi H, Jaberzadeh M, Fathi M.H, Novel fabrication of forsterite scaffold with improved mechanical properties, J. Alloys Compd., 2011; 509: 63-68.
7. Gu H.J., Guo F.F., Zhou X., Gong L.L., Zhang Y., Zhai W.Y., Chen L., Cen L., Yin S., Chang J., Cui L. The stimulation of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by ionic products from akermanite dissolution via activation of the ERK pathway. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7023-7033.
8. 6 clinopyroxenes. Am. Mineral. 2012, 97:1339-1347.
9. Reddy A.A., Tulyaganov U., Mather G.C., Lopez S.R., Das S., Pascual M.J., Munoz F., Siegel R., Senker J., Ferreira J.M.F. Influence of strontium oxide on structural transformations in diopside-based glass-ceramics assessed by diverse structural tools 2015, 119:11482-11492.
10. 6) scaffold: a promising bioactive material for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:2237-2245.
11. Ghorbanian L., Emadi R., Razavi M., Shin H., Teimouri A. Synthesis and characterization of novel nanodiopside bioceramic powder. Journal of Nanostructures 2012, 2:357-361.
12. Iwata N.Y., Lee G.H., Tsunakawa S., Tokuoka Y., Kawashima N. Preparation of diopside with apatite-forming ability by sol-gel process using metal alkoxide and metal salts. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2004, 33:1-6.
13. Razavi M., Fathi M.h., Savabi O., Vashaee D., Tayebi L. In vitro study of nanostructured diopside coating on Mg alloy orthopedic implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 41:168-177.
14. 6). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 288:130-137.
15. Razavi M., Fathi M.h., Savabi O., Razavi S.M., Heidari F., Manshaei M., Vashaee D., Tayebi L. In vivo study of nanostructured diopside (CaMgSi2O6) coating on magnesium alloy as biodegradable orthopedic implants. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 313:60-66.
16. Webster T.J., Ergun C., Doremus R.H., Siegel R.W., Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000, 21:1803-1810.
17. Ghomi H., Fathi M.H., Edris H. Fabrication and characterization of triple nanobioceramic composite foam. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46:1809-1817.
18. Ghomi H., Fathi M.H., Edris H. Effect of the composition of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams on their bioactivity and mechanical properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47:3523-3532.
19. Ribeiro G.B.M., Trommer R.M., dos Santos L.A., Bergmann C.P. Novel method to produce β-TCP scaffolds. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65:275-277.
20. Martínez-Vázquez F.J., Perera F.H., Miranda P., Pajares A., Guiberteau F. Improving the compressive strength of bioceramic robocast scaffolds by polymer infiltration. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:4361-4368.
21. Mansourighasri A., Muhamad N., Sulong A.B. Processing titanium foams using tapioca starch as a space holder. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2012, 212:83-89.
22. Williamson G.H., Hall W.H. X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram. Acta Metall. 1953, 1:22-31.
23. Askeland D.R. The Science and Engineering of Materials 1989, PWS Pub. Co. 2nd ed.
24. Bohner M., Lemaitre J. Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution?. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2175-2179.
25. Aguilar-Reyes E.A., Leon-Patino C.A., Jacinto-Diaz B., Lefebvre L. Ph, Structural characterization and mechanical evaluation of bioactive glass 45S5 foams obtained by a powder technology approach. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 95:3776-3780.
26. Jones J.R., Ehrenfried L.M., Hench L.L. Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27:964-973.
27. Yuan H.P., Kurashina K., De Bruijn J.D., Li Y.B., De Groot K., Zhang X.D. A preliminary study on osteoinduction of two kinds of calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials 1999, 20:1799-1806.
28. Lu J., Descamps M., Dejou J., Koubi G., Hardouin P., Lemaitre J., Proust J.P. The biodegradation mechanism of calcium phosphate biomaterials in bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 63:408-412.
29. Chen Q.Z., Thompson I.D., Boccaccini A.R. 45S5 bioglass derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2414-2425.
30. Tamai N., Myoui A., Tomita T., Nakase T., Tanaka J., Ochi T. Novel hydroxyapatite ceramics with an interconnective porous structure inhibit superior osteoconduction in vivo. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 59:110-117.
31. Soundrapandian C., Datta S., Kundu B., Basu D., Sa B. Porous bioactive glass scaffolds for local drug delivery in osteomyelitis: development and in vitro characterization. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2010, 11:1675-1683.
32. Hoppe A., Guldal N.S., Boccaccini A.R. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2757-2774.
33. Wu C., Chang J. A review of bioactive silicate ceramics. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 8:032001.