SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 474-479

  Ogrinc, Greg ^a,b,c   Davies, Louise ^a,b   Goodman, Daisy ^a   Batalden, Paul ^a   Davidoff, Frank ^c   Stevens, David ^c,d,e  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^d White River Junction VA Medical Center ^*  (United Kingdom)

^e INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84953342243     PISSN: 15537250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41062-1     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):319-325.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Expanding Research and Evaluation Designs to Improve the Science Base for Health Care and Public Health Quality Improvement Symposium. Sep 15, 2005, Washington DC. Meeting Summary. Mar 2009. Accessed Aug 28, 2015. http://archive.ahrq.gov/news/events/other/phqisymp/index.html.
3. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: The state of the science. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(1):138-150.
4. Grol RP, et al. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: The use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138.
5. Rubenstein LV, et al. Finding order in heterogeneity: Types of quality-improvement intervention publications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(6):403-408.
6. Davidoff F, et al. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: Evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Safety Health Care. 2008;17 Suppl 1:i3-9.
7. Batalden P, et al. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(5):103-111.
8. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel (IEC). Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington, DC: IEC, 2011. Accessed Aug 28, 2015. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/ipecreport.pdf.
9. Association of American Medical Colleges. Teaching for Quality. Accessed Aug 28, 2015. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cei/te4q/.
10. Cronenwett L, et al. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook. 2007; 55(3):122-131.
11. Nasca TJ, et al. The next GME accreditation system: Rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1051-1056.
12. Davidoff F, et al. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24(3):228-238.
13. The Health Foundation. Perspectives on Context. Bate P, et al. Mar 2014. Accessed Aug 28, 2015. http://www.health.org.uk/publication/perspectives-context.
14. Kaplan HC, et al. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): Building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):13-20.
15. Øvretveit J. Understanding the conditions for improvement: Research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20 Suppl 1:i18-23.
16. Taylor SL, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(7):611-617.
17. Hoffmann TC, et al. Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:61687.
18. Portela MC, et al. How to study improvement interventions: A brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(5):325-336.
19. Davies L, et al. The SQUIRE Guidelines: An evaluation from the field, five years post release. BMJ Qual Saf. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
20. Howell V, et al. The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: A before-and-after study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(6):400-406
21. Stevens DP. SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(6):349-351.
22. Davies L, et al. Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: User road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0. BMJ Qual Saf. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
23. Equator Network. Enhancing the QUality and Transparency of Health Research. Home page. Accessed Aug 28, 2015. http://www.equator-network.org/.
24. Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: The IMRaD format. Journal of the American Medical Writers Association. 1989;4(2):16-18.
25. Huth EJ. Writing and Publishing in Medicine, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1999.
26. Personal communication between an author [G.O.] and Daisy Goodman, DNP, MPH, Fellow, VA Quality Scholars Fellowship Program and Instructor, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. Hanover, NH, Aug 20, 2015.
27. SQUIRE Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence. Home page. Accessed Aug 28, 2015. http://www.squire-statement.org.