The United States

Research Handbook on Climate Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 213-223

  Bang, Guri ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OSLO CICERO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953255694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781783470600.00029     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Arnold, D.R. (1990), The Logic of Congressional Action, New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Bang, G. (2011), Signed but not ratified: limits to US participation in international environmental agreements, Review of Policy Research, 28(1), 65-81.
3. Bang, G. and T. Skodvin (2014), US climate policy and the shale gas revolution, in J. Hovi, T. Cherry and D. McEvoy (eds.), Toward a New Climate Agreement: Conflict, Resolution and Governance, London:Routledge, pp. 76-90.
4. Bang, G., J. Hovi and D. Sprinz (2012), US presidents and the failure to ratify multilateral environmental agreements, Climate Policy, 12(6), 755-763.
5. Christoff, P. (2010), Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15, Environmental Politics, 19(4), 637-656.
6. C2ES (2015), Carbon pollution standards map, Final State Rate-Based Targets. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, http://www.c2es.org/federal/executive/epa/carbon-pollution- standards- map (accessed August 28, 2015).
7. DeSombre, E. (2000), Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. DeSombre, E. (2011), The United States and global environmental politics: domestic sources of US unilateralism, in R.A. Axelrod, S.D. VanDeveer and D.L. Brownie (eds.), The Global Environment:Institutions, Law, and Policy, 3rd edn, Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 192-212.
9. EIA (2013a), Proved Reserves of Natural Gas (Trillion Cubic Feet), www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3. cfm?tid53&pid53&aid56 (accessed March 31, 2014).
10. EIA (2013b), Selected average prices of natural gas in the United States, 2008-2012, Natural Gas Annual, www.eia.gov/naturalgas/annual (accessed March 31, 2014).
11. EIA (2013c), Annual Energy Outlook, Early Release Overview, www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/early_production. cfm?src5Natural-b2 (accessed March 31, 2014).
12. EIA (2014a), Market trends: electricity demand, Annual Energy Outlook 2014, www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/MT_electric.cfm (accessed November 24, 2014).
13. EIA (2014b), Planned coal-fired power plant retirements continue to increase, Today in Energy, March 20, www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id515491 (accessed March 31, 2014).
14. EIA (2014c), US energy-related CO2 emissions in 2013 expected to be 2% higher than in 2012, Today in Energy, January 13, www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id514571 (accessed March 31, 2014).
15. EIA (2014d), Lower electricity-related CO2 emissions reflect lower carbon intensity and electricity use, Today in Energy, October 23, www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id518511 (accessed November 23, 2014).
16. Energy Wire (2013), Cheap gas puts pressure on coal power in Appalachia, December 2, www.eenews.net/ener gywire/stories/1059991125/search (accessed March 31, 2014).
17. Energy Wire (2014a), Scars from last climate bill show up in ambitious EPA power plant rule, June 3, www.eenews.net/energywire/stories/1060000604/search?keyword5epa (accessed November 22, 2014).
18. Energy Wire (2014b), Industry commits nearly $2M to fight state anti-fracking ballots, March 27, www.eenews. net/energywire/stories/1059996803/search (accessed March 31, 2014).
19. EPA (2014a), Regulations and Standards: Light Duty, www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regs-light- duty. htm#new1 (accessed November 24, 2014).
20. EPA (2014b), Developing Carbon Pollution Standards Under the Clean Air Act, www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution- standards/what-epa- doing (accessed November 24, 2014).
21. EPA (2014c), Carbon Pollution Standards, www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution- standards/learn-about- carbon- pollution- power- plants# what (accessed February 10, 2015).
22. Fisher, D. (2006), Bringing the material back in: understanding the US position on climate change, Sociological Forum, 21(3), 467-494.
23. Greenwire (2012), Wastewater injection well sparked earthquake - Ohio officials, March 9, www.eenews.net/greenwire/stories/1059961197 (accessed March 31, 2014).
24. Greenwire (2013), EPA’s new carbon rule sparks battle over CCS, with legal challenges likely, September 20, www.eenews.net/greenwire/stories/1059987620/search (accessed March 31, 2014).
25. Greenwire (2014), McConnell, Inhofe vow to strike EPA power proposal, June 3, www.eenews.net/greenwire/stories/1060000633/search?keyword5epa (accessed November 22, 2014).
26. Hovi, J., D. Sprinz and G. Bang (2012), Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol:German, Norwegian and US perspectives, European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 129-150.
27. IPCC (2013), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Krehbiel, K. (1998), Pivotal Politics. A Theory of US Lawmaking, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Lizza, R. (2010), As the world burns: how the Senate and the White House missed their best chance to deal with climate change, The New Yorker, October 11.
30. Lowi, T.J., B. Ginsberg, K.A. Shepsle and S. Ansolabehere (2014), American Government: Power and Purpose, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
31. Mayer, K. (2001), With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. McCright, A.M. and R.E. Dunlap (2011), The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010, The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155-194.
33. Palmer, B. (2009), Senate Consideration of Treaties, Report 7-5700, September, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.
34. Shull, S.A. (2006), Policy by Other Means: Alternative Adoption by Presidents, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
35. Skocpol, T. (2013), Naming the Problem: What it Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming, paper presented at the symposium The Politics of America’s Fight against Global Warming, February 14, Harvard University.
36. Skodvin, T. (2010), ‘Pivotal politics’ in US energy and climate legislation, Energy Policy, 38(8), 4214-4223.
37. Stavins, R. (2010), Why Cancun trumped Copenhagen: warmer relations on rising temperatures, Christian Science Monitor, December 20, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/20625/why_cancun_trumped_ copenhagen.html (accessed March 31, 2014).
38. Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. US Federal Register (2014a), Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, January 8, www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/01/08/2013-28668/standards-of- performance- for- greenhouse- gas- emissions- from- new- stationary- sources- electric- utility (accessed March 31, 2014).
40. US Federal Register (2014b), Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, June 18, www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/06/18/2014-13726/carbon-pollution- emission- guidelines- for- existing- stationary- sources- electric- utility- generating (accessed November 24, 2014).
41. Wallach, P.A. (2012), US Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Brookings Institution Report, October.
42. White House (2013), Climate Change and President Obama’s Action Plan, www.whitehouse.gov/climate-change# section-cutting- carbon- pollution (accessed November 24, 2014).