Signed but Not Ratified: Limits to U.S. Participation in International Environmental Agreements

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 65-81

  Bang, Guri ^a  

^a Center for International Climate and Environmental Research (CICERO)   (France)

Author keywords

Climate change; Domestic politics; Ratification; United States

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; INTERNATIONAL LAW; NATIONAL POLITICS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79751520649     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00479.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Chemistry Council (ACC). (2006). Statement: American Chemistry Council testifies before Congress in support of Gillmor "POPs" legislation. Retrieved from
2. Bryner, G. (2008). Failure and opportunity: Environmental groups in U.S. climate change policy. Environmental Politics, 17(2), 319-336.
3. Chiou, F. Y., & Rothenberg, L. (2003). When pivotal politics meet partisan politics. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 503-522.
4. Congressional Record. (1994a). Page S8485, July 11. Retrieved from
5. Congressional Record. (1994b). Page S13793, September 30. Retrieved from
6. Congressional Record. (1994c). Page S15067, October 8. Retrieved from
7. DeSombre, E. (2010). The United States and global environmental politics: Domestic sources of U.S. unilateralism. In R. A. Axelrod, S. D. VanDeveer, & D. L. Brownie (Eds.), The global environment: Institutions, law, and policy, 3rd ed. (pp. 192-212). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
8. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Biotechnology program under toxic substances control act. Retrieved from
9. Fisher, D. (2004). National governance and the global climate change regime. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
10. Fisher, D. (2006). Bringing the material back in: Understanding the U.S. position on climate change. Sociological Forum, 21(3), 467-494.
11. Goodman, S. (2010, March 5). Experts push U.S. approval of 3 treaties as part of TSCA overhaul. Environment and Energy News Service. Retrieved from
12. Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal politics. A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Lee, F. E. (2005). Interests, constituencies, and policy making. In P. A. Quirk & S. A. Binder (Eds.), Institutions of American democracy: The legislative branch (pp. 281-313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Lizza, R. (2010). As the world burns. The New Yorker. Retrieved from
15. Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (2002). Democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organizations, 56(3), 477-513.
16. Mayhew, D. R. (2005). Divided we govern. Party control, lawmaking, and investigations, 1946-2002, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, B. P. (1997). Democratic politics and international trade negotiations: Elections and divided governments as constraints on trade liberalization. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 117-146.
18. Morello, L. (2006a, July 21). EPA chief urges House panel to approve POPs bill. Environment and Energy Daily News Service. Retrieved from
19. Morello, L. (2006b, September 20). POPs bills still on target for House vote, sponsors say. Environment and Energy Daily News Service. Retrieved from
20. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). (2009). Acreage. Report. Retrieved from
21. Palmer, B. (2009). Senate consideration of treaties (Report 7-5700). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
22. Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427-460.
23. Rabe, B. G. (2010). Can Congress govern the climate? In B. G. Rabe (Ed.), Greenhouse governance: Addressing climate change in America (pp. 260-285). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
24. Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(1), 277-309.
25. Rosendal, G. K. (2006). Balancing access and benefit sharing and legal protection of innovations from bioprospecting: Impacts on conservation of biodiversity. The Journal of Environment and Development, 15(4), 428-447.
26. Samuelsohn, D. (2009, February 10). Senate cap-and-trade boosters still searching for path to 60 votes. Environment and Energy News Service. Retrieved from
27. Samuelsohn, D. (2010, May 12). Kerry, Lieberman to end the suspense with energy bill rollout today. Environment and Energy News Service. Retrieved from
28. Schafer, K. S. (2006, August 31). One more failed U.S. environmental policy. Foreign Policy in Focus Report. Retrieved from
29. Schor, E. (2010, September 24). Obama admin steps up pressure to ratify treaties on toxics. Environment and Energy News Service. Retrieved from
30. Schreurs, M. A. (2004). The climate change divide: The European Union, the United States, and the future of the Kyoto Protocol. In N. Vig & M. Faure (Eds.), Green giants? Environmental policies of the United States and the European Union (pp. 207-230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Schreurs, M. A., Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2009). Expanding transatlantic relations: Implications for environment and energy policies. In M. A. Schreurs, H. Selin, & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Transatlantic environment and energy politics: Comparative and international perspectives (pp. 1-18). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
32. Selin, H. (2009). Transatlantic politics of chemicals management. In M. A. Schreurs, H. Selin, & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Transatlantic environment and energy politics: Comparative and international perspectives (pp. 57-74). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
33. Selin, H. (2010). Global governance of hazardous chemicals: Challenges of multilevel management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Sinclair, B. (2007). Unorthodox lawmaking: New Legislative processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
35. Skodvin, T. (2010). "Pivotal politics" in US energy and climate legislation. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4214-4223.
36. Sovereignty International. (1998). How the convention on biodiversity was defeated. Retrieved from
37. Theriault, S. (2008). Party polarization in Congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
39. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2007). 2007 Census of agriculture: Market value of agricultural products sold (Map 07-MO12). Retrieved from
40. U.S. Department of State. (1994, October 6). Letter to Senator Dole. Washington, DC. Retrieved from
41. U.S. POPs Watch. (2010). Congress and the POPs Treaty. Retrieved from
42. U.S. Senate. (2001). Treaties and other international agreements: The role of the United States Senate, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Report No. S. Prt. 106-71. Retrieved from
43. U.S. Senate. (2006). Amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 4591. Retrieved from
44. U.S. Senate. (2010, October 30). Roll call votes 108th Congress-1st Session, Vote Number 420. Retrieved from