Comparison of Agent-Based Modeling and Equation-Based Modeling for Transportation Behavioral Studies

CICTP 2015 - Efficient, Safe, and Green Multimodal Transportation - Proceedings of the 15th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 3610-3625

  Mao, Chao ^a   Zou, Mingqiao ^a   Liu, Yulin ^a   Xue, Weitong ^a   Li, Meng ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling (ABM); Equation based modeling (EBM); Logit model; Machine learning.; Travel mode choice

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION; SURVEYS; TRANSPORTATION;

AGENT-BASED MODEL; BEHAVIORAL STUDIES; EQUATION-BASED MODELING; LOGIT MODELING; PREDICTION ACCURACY; PRODUCTION RULES; TRAVEL MODE CHOICES; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 84953231863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/9780784479292.334     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. Security & Privacy, IEEE, 3 (1) , 26-33.
2. Banister, D. (1978). The influence of habit formation on modal choice-A Heuristic Model. Transportation, 7 (1) , 5-33.
3. Ben-Akiva & Lerman (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand, MIT Press.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., De Palma, A., & Isam, K. (1991). Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Research Part A: General, 25 (5) , 251-266.
5. Berkovec, J., & Rust, J. (1985). A nested logit model of automobile holdings for one vehicle households. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 19 (4) , 275-285.
6. Camerer, C. (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics, 1 (2) , 163-183.
7. Curtis, C., & Headicar, P. (1997). Targeting travel awareness campaigns: Which individuals are more likely to switch from car to other transport for the journey to work?. Transport Policy, 4 (1) , 57-65.
8. Emmerink, R. H., Axhausen, K. W., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). The potential of information provision in a simulated road transport network with non-recurrent congestion. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 3 (5) , 293-309.
9. Forinash, C. V., & Koppelman, F. S. (1993). Application and interpretation of nested logit models of intercity mode choice. Transportation Research Record, (1413).
10. Frank, E., Hall, M., Holmes, G., Kirkby, R., Pfahringer, B., Witten, I. H., & Trigg, L. (2005). Weka. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook (pp. 1305-1314). Springer US.
11. Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1219-1240.
12. Horowitz, J. L. (1984). The stability of stochastic equilibrium in a two-link transportation network. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 18 (1) , 13-28.
13. Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Höger, R. (2001). Responsibility and environment ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33 (6) , 830-852.
14. Koppelman, F. S., & Wen, C. H. (1998). Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 32 (5) , 289-298.
15. Lotan, T., & Koutsopoulos, H. N. (1993). Models for route choice behavior in the presence of information using concepts from fuzzy set theory and approximate reasoning. Transportation, 20 (2) , 129-155.
16. Louviere, J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., DeShazo, J. R., Cameron, T., & Marley, T. (2002). Dissecting the random component of utility. Marketing Letters, 13 (3) , 177-193.
17. Luce, R. D. (2012). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. DoverPublications. com.
18. McDonnell, S., & Zellner, M. (2011). Exploring the effectiveness of bus rapid transit a prototype agent-based model of commuting behavior. Transport Policy, 18 (6) , 825-835.
19. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.
20. Parunak, H. V. D., Savit, R., & Riolo, R. L. (1998, January). Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users guide. InMulti-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation (pp. 10-25). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
21. Rahmandad H, Sterman J. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54 (5) : 998-1014.
22. Sun Y, Cheng L. A Survey on Agent-Based Modelling and Equation-based Modelling[J]. Department of Computer Science. Georgia State University. Atlanta. Disponível em: www. cs. gsu. edu/~csclicx/Csc8350/model. pdf.
23. Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press.
24. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185 (4157) , 1124-1131.
25. Vythoulkas, P. C., & Koutsopoulos, H. N. (2003). Modeling discrete choice behavior using concepts from fuzzy set theory, approximate reasoning and neural networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 11 (1) , 51-73.
26. Wehinger, L. A., Galus, M. D., & Andersson, G. (2010, June). Agent-based simulator for the German electricity wholesale market including wind power generation and widescale PHEV adoption. In Energy Market (EEM) , 2010 7th International Conference on the European (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
27. Zhang, L. (2006). Agent-based behavioral model of spatial learning and route choice. In Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting (No. 06-2577).
28. Zhang, L. (2006). Search, Information, Learning, and Knowledge in Travel Decision-Making (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA).
29. Zhang, L., & Xiong, C. (2012). How Do Travelers Actually Adjust Departure Times: A Positive Model of Peak Spreading Dynamics.
30. Zou, M. Q., Chen, X. Q., Yu, H. X., Tong, Y. N., Huang, Z. W., & Li, M. (2013). Dynamic Transportation Planning and Operations: Concept, Framework and Applications in China. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 2232-2343.