The long-term effect on mental health symptoms and patient activation of using patient feedback scales in mental health out-patient treatment. A randomised controlled trial

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 164-168

  Rise, Marit By ^a   Eriksen, Lasse ^a,b   Grimstad, Hilde ^a   Steinsbekk, Aslak ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Mental health care; Outcome assessment; Patient participation; Professional patient relations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOUR AND SYMPTOM IDENTIFICATION SCALE 32; CLIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE 8; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH CENTER; NORWAY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME RATING SCALE; OUTPATIENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PARTNER FOR CHANGE OUTCOME MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; PATIENT ACTIVATION MEASURE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SESSION RATING SCALE; SHORT FORM 12; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT ALLIANCE SCALE; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN RELATION; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84952872771     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Lambert M.J. Outcome in psychotherapy: the past and important advances. Psychotherapy (Chicago) 2013, 50:42-51.
2. Boswell J.F., Kraus D.R., Miller S.D., Lambert M.J. Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychother. Res. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.817696.
3. Simon W., Lambert M.J., Harris M.W., Busath G., Vazquez A. Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychother. Res. 2012, 22:638-647.
4. Crits-Christoph P., Ring-Kurtz S., Hamilton J.L., Lambert M.J., Gallop R., McClure B., et al. A preliminary study of the effects of individual patient-level feedback in outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2012, 42:301-309.
5. Miller S.D., Duncan B.L., Sorrell R., Brown G.S. The partners for change outcome management system. J. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 61:199-208.
6. Reese R., Norsworthy L., Rowlands S. Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy (Chicago) 2009, 46:418-431.
7. Anker M., Duncan B., Sparks J. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: a randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2009, 77:693-704.
8. Reese R.J., Toland M.D., Slone N.C., Norsworthy L.A. Effect of client feedback on couple psychotherapy outcomes. Psychotherapy (Chicago) 2010, 47:616-630.
9. Rise M.B., Eriksen L., Grimstad H., Steinsbekk A. The short-term effect on alliance and satisfaction of using patient feedback scales in mental health out-patient treatment. A randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012, 12. E-pub ahead of print.
10. Eisen S.V., Dill D.L., Grob M.C. Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hosp. Commun. Psychiatry 1994, 45:242-247.
11. Hibbard J.H., Stockard J., Mahoney E.R., Tusler M. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv. Res. 2004, 39:1005-1026.
12. Steinsbekk A. Patient activation measure. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 2008, 128:2316-2318.
13. Blais M.A. Development of an inpatient treatment alliance scale. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2004, 192:487-493.
14. Larsen D.L., Attkisson C.C., Hargreaves W.A., Nguyen T.D. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval. Program Plan. 1979, 2:197-207.
15. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med. Care 1996, 34:220-233.
16. Clements K., Murphy J., Eisen S., Normand S. Comparison of self-report and clinician-rated measures of psychiatric symptoms and functioning in predicting 1-year hospital readmission. Adm. Policy Ment. Health 2006, 33:568-577.
17. Altman D., Bland J. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ 2003, 326:219.
18. Lambert M.J., Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy (Chicago) 2011, 48:72-79.