Effect of client feedback on couple psychotherapy outcomes

Psychotherapy

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 616-630

  Reese, Robert J ^a   Toland, Michael D ^a   Slone, Norah C ^a   Norsworthy, Larry A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Couple therapy; Feedback; Patient focused research; Psychotherapeutic outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLIENT FEEDBACK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; MARITAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT MONITORING; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;

ADULT; FAMILY CONFLICT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; MARITAL THERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78651378774     PISSN: 00333204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021182     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ackerman S., Smith B., Beutler L.E., Gelso C.J., Goldfried M.R., Hill C., Rainer J. Empirically supported therapy relationships: Conclusions and recommendations of the Division 29 Task Force. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2001, 38:495-497. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.495.
2. Alvero A.M., Bucklin B.R., Austin J. An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 2001, 21:3-29. doi: 10.1300/J075v21n01_02.
3. Anker M.G., Duncan B.L., Sparks J.A. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009, 77:693-704. doi: 10.1037/a0016062.
4. Baldwin S.A., Berkeljon A., Atkins D.C., Olsen J.A., Nielsen S.L. Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose-effect and good-enough level models of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009, 77:203-211. doi: 10.1037/a0015235.
5. Barkham M., Margison F., Leach C., Lucock M., Mellor-Clark J., Evans C., McGrath G. Service profiling and outcome benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2001, 69:184-196. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.184.
6. Christensen A., Atkins D.C., Berns S., Wheeler J., Baucom D., Simpson L.E. Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004, 72:176-191. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.176.
7. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
8. Derogatis L.R. Administration, scoring and procedures manual II 1992, Clinical Psychometric Research, Baltimore.
9. Duncan B.L., Miller S.D., Reynolds L., Sparks J., Claud D., Brown J., Johnson L.D. The Session Rating Scale: Psychometric properties of a " working" alliance scale. Journal of Brief Therapy 2003, 3:3-12. Retrieved from http://www.journalbrieftherapy.com/.
10. Duncan B.L., Miller S.D., Sparks J.A. The heroic client: A revolutionary way to improve effectiveness through client-directed, outcome-informed therapy 2004, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
11. Enders C.K., Tofighi D. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods 2007, 12:121-138. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
12. Feingold A. Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods 2009, 14:43-53. doi: 10.1037/a0014699.
13. Gollan K.K., Jacobson N.S. Developments in couple therapy research. Family psychology: Science-based interventions 2002, 105-122. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. H.A. Liddle, D.A. Santisteban, R.F. Levant, J.H. Bray (Eds.).
14. Harmon C.S., Lambert M.J., Smart D.M., Hawkins E., Nielsen S.L., Slade K., Lutz W. Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research 2007, 17:379-392. doi: 10.1080/10503300600702331.
15. Hawkins E.J., Lambert M.J., Vermeersch D.A., Slade K.L., Tuttle K.C. The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information. Psychotherapy Research 2004, 14:308-327. doi: 10.1093/ptr/kph027.
16. Horvath A.O., Symonds B.D. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1991, 38:139-149. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139.
17. Howard K.L., Kopta S.M., Krause M.S., Orlinksy D.E. The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist 1986, 41:159-164. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.2.159.
18. Hox J. Multilevel analysis techniques and applications 2002, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
19. Isakson R.L., Hawkins E.J., Harmon S.C., Slade K., Martinez J.S., Lambert M.J. Assessing couple therapy as a treatment for individual distress: When is referral to couple therapy contraindicated?. Contemporary Family Therapy 2006, 28:313-322. doi: 10.1007/s10591-006-9008-9.
20. Jacobson N.S., Truax P. Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991, 59:12-19. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12.
21. Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B., Bauer S. Assessing the clinical significance of outcome results. Evidence-based outcome research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychosocial interventions 2008, 359-378. Oxford University Press, New York. A.M. Nezu, C.M. Nezu (Eds.).
22. Lambert M.J., Hansen N.B., Umphress V., Lunnen K., Okiishi J., Burlingame G., Reisinger C. Administration and scoring manual for the OQ 45.2 1996, American Professional Credentialing Services, Stevenson, MD.
23. Lambert M.J., Harmon C., Slade K., Whipple J.L., Hawkins E.J. Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients' progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005, 61:165-174. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20113.
24. Lambert M.J., Ogles B. The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change 2004, 139-193. Wiley, New York. 5th ed. M.J. Lambert (Ed.).
25. Lambert M.J., Whipple J.L., Hawkins E.J., Vermeersch D.A., Nielsen S.L., Smart D.W. Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology 2003, 10:288-301. doi: 10.1093/clipsy/bpg025.
26. Lambert M.J., Whipple J.L., Smart D.W., Vermeersch D.A., Nielsen S.L., Hawkins E.J. The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced?. Psychotherapy Research 2001, 11:49-68. doi: 10.1093/ptr/11.1.49.
27. Lambert M.J., Whipple J.L., Vermeersch D.A., Smart D.W., Hawkins E.J., Nielson S.L., Goates M. Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client progress: A replication. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2002, 9:91-103. doi: 10.1002/cpp.324.
28. Locke H.J., Wallace K.M. Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living 1959, 21:251-255. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.
29. Lutz W., Martinovich Z., Howard K. Patient profiling: An application of random coefficient regression models to depicting the response of a patient to outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1999, 67:571-577. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.4.571.
30. Miller S.D., Duncan B.L. The Outcome and Session Rating Scales: Administration and scoring manual 2004, Author, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
31. Miller S.D., Duncan B.L., Brown J., Sorrell R., Chalk B. Using outcome to inform and improve treatment outcomes. Journal of Brief Therapy 2006, 5:5-22. Retrieved from http://www.journalbrieftherapy.com/.
32. Miller S.D., Duncan B.L., Brown K., Sparks J., Claud D. The Outcome Rating Scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy 2003, 2:91-100. Retrieved from http://www.journalbrieftherapy.com/.
33. Miller S.D., Mee-Lee D., Plum W., Hubble M.A. Making treatment count: Client-directed, outcome informed clinical work with problem drinkers. Handbook of clinical family therapy 2005, 281-308. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. J.L. Lebow (Ed.).
34. Muthén B.O. Re: Timepoints [Online discussion] 1999, October 29, Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/14/20.html#POST16727.
35. Muthén B.O., Curran P.J. General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods 1997, 2:371-402. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.371.
36. Peugh J.L. A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology 2010, 48:85-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002.
37. Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2002, Sage, Newbury Park, CA. 6th ed.
38. Reese, R. J., Norsworthy, L. A., & Rowlands, S. (2006, August). Does a popular client feedback model improve psychotherapy outcome? Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
39. Reese R.J., Norsworthy L., Rowlands S. Does a continuous feedback model improve psychotherapy outcomes?. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2009, 46:418-431. doi: 10.1037/a0017901.
40. Shadish W.R., Baldwin S.A. Meta-analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2003, 29:547-570. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01694.x.
41. Shadish W.R., Baldwin S.A. Effects of behavioral marital therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2005, 73:6-14. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.6.
42. Shadish W.R., Montgomery L., Wilson P., Wilson M., Bright I., Okwumabua T. The effects of family and marital psychotherapies: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993, 61:992-1002. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.6.992.
43. Snyder D.K., Castellani A.M., Whisman M.A. Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:317-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154.
44. Tambling R.B., Johnson L.N. The relationship between stages of change and outcome in couple therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy 2008, 36:229-241. doi: 10.1080/01926180701290941.
45. What works clearing house: Procedures and standards handbook (version 2.0) 2008, U.S. Department of Education: Institute of Education Sciences, Retrieved from http://ies.Ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_procedures_v2_standards_handbook.pdf.
46. Wampold B.E. The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings 2001, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
47. Whipple J.L., Lambert M.J., Vermeersch D.A., Smart D.W., Nielsen S.L., Hawkins E.J. Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment failure and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2003, 50:59-68. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.59.
48. Willett J.B., Singer J.D., Martin N.C. The design and analysis of longitudinal studies of development and psychopathology in context: Statistical models and methodological recommendations. Development and Psychopathology 1998, 10:395-426. doi: 10.1017/S0954579498001667.