Patient-Specific Biomechanical Modeling for Guidance During Minimally-Invasive Hepatic Surgery

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 139-153

  Plantefève, Rosalie ^a   Peterlik, Igor ^b   Haouchine, Nazim ^c   Cotin, Stéphane ^c  

^a Altran and Inria (Mimesis Team)   (France)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c Inria (Mimesis Team)   (France)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Non rigid registration; Patient specific modeling; Real time simulation

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEFORMATION; ENDOSCOPY; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; IMAGE REGISTRATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ITERATIVE CLOSEST POINTS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; PATIENT SPECIFIC MODEL; QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; REAL TIME SIMULATIONS; TARGET REGISTRATION ERRORS;

SURGERY;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLISSON CAPSULE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIVER; LIVER PARENCHYMA; LIVER STRUCTURE; LIVER SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; VASCULARIZATION; FEMALE; MALE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PRECISION MEDICINE;

EID: 84952871290     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1419-z     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Antiga, L. and B. Ene-Iordache. Centerline computation and geometric analysis of branching tubular surfaces with application to blood vessel modeling. WSCG, 2003.
2. Bano, J. et al. Simulation of pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery planning. In: Proceedings of the 15th MICCAI: Part I, pp. 91–98, 2012.
3. Baraff, D. and A. Witkin. Large steps in cloth simulation. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH ’98, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 43–54, 1998.
4. Boltcheva, D., M. Yvinec, and J.-D. Boissonnat. Mesh generation from 3d multi-material images. In: Proceedings of the 12th MICCAI—Volume Part II, Berlin: Springer, pp. 283–290, 2009.
5. Bouguet, J.Y. Pyramidal implementation of the Lucas Kanade feature tracker: description of the algorithm, 2002.
6. Clements, L.W. et al. Robust surface registration using salient anatomical features for image-guided liver surgery: algorithm and validation. Med. Phys. 35(6):2528–2540, 2008.
7. Courtecuisse, H., J. Allard, P. Kerfriden, S.P. Bordas, S. Cotin, and C. Duriez. Real-time simulation of contact and cutting of heterogeneous soft-tissues. Med. Image Anal. 18(2):394–410, 2014.
8. Dos Santos, T.R., A. Seitel, T. Kilgus, S. Suwelack, A.-L. Wekerle, H. Kenngott, S. Speidel, H.-P. Schlemmer, H.-P. Meinzer, and T. Heimann, et al. Pose-independent surface matching for intra-operative soft-tissue marker-less registration. Med. Image Anal. 18(7):1101–1114, 2014.
9. Duriez, C., S. Cotin, J. Lenoir, and P. Neumann. New approaches to catheter navigation for interventional radiology simulation 1. Comput. Aided Surg. 11(6):300–308, 2006.
10. Elhawary, H. and A. Popovic. Robust feature tracking on the beating heart for a robotic-guided endoscope. Int J Med Robot. 7:459–468, 2010.
11. Felippa, C.A. A study of optimal membrane triangles with drilling freedoms. CMAME 192(16–18):2125–2168, 2003.
12. Gauglitz, S., T. Hllerer, and M. Turk. Evaluation of interest point detectors and feature descriptors for visual tracking. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 94(3):335–360, 2011.
13. Gower, J.C. Generalised procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33–51, 1975.
14. Haouchine, N., J. Dequidt, I. Peterlik, E. Kerrien, M.-O. Berger, and S. Cotin. Image-guided simulation of heterogeneous tissue deformation for augmented reality during hepatic surgery. In ISMAR 2013, pp. 199–208, 2013.
15. Haouchine, N., J. Dequidt, I. Peterlik, E. Kerrien, M.-O. Berger, and S. Cotin. Towards an accurate tracking of liver tumors for augmented reality in robotic assisted surgery. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4121–4126, 2014.
16. Haouchine, N., I. Peterlik, J. Dequidt, M. Sanz-Lopez, E. Kerrien, M.-O. Berger, and S. Cotin. Impact of soft tissue heterogeneity on augmented reality for liver surgery. IEEE TVCG 21:584– 597, 2015, accepted for publication.
17. Hartley, R.I. and A. Zisserman. Multiple view geometry in computer vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521540518, 2004.
18. Kerdok, A.E., M.P. Ottensmeyer, and R.D. Howe. Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver. J. Biomech. 39:2221–2231, 2006.
19. Maier-Hein, L., P. Mountney, A. Bartoli, H. Elhawary, D. Elson, A. Groch, A. Kolb, M. Rodrigues, J. Sorger, S. Speidel, and D. Stoyanov. Optical techniques for 3d surface reconstruction in computer-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Med. Image Anal. 17:974–996, 2013.
20. Mazza, E., A. Nava, D. Hahnloser, W. Jochum, and M. Bajka. The mechanical response of human liver and its relation to histology: An in vivo study. Med. Image Anal. 11(6):663–672, 2007.
21. Mikolajczyk, K. and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27(10):1615–1630, 2005.
22. Nesme, M., Y. Payan, and F. Faure. Efficient, physically plausible finite elements. In: Eurographics 2005, Short papers, August, 2005, edited by J. Dingliana and F. Ganovelli, Trinity College, Dublin, pp. 77–80, 2005.
23. Nguyen, B., T. Yang, F. Leong, S. Chang, and S. Ong. Patient specific biomechanical modeling of hepatic vasculature for augmented reality surgery. In: Proceedings of MIAR2008, pp. 50–57, 2008.
24. Nicolau, S., L. Soler, D. Mutter, and J. Marescaux. Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg. Oncol. 20(3):189–201, 2011.
25. Oktay, O. et al. Biomechanically driven registration of pre- to intra-operative 3d images for laparoscopic surgery. In: Proceedings of the 16th MICCAI: Part II, pp. 1–9, 2013.
26. Peterlik, I., C. Duriez, and S. Cotin. Modeling and real-time simulation of a vascularized liver tissue. In: Proceedings of the 15th MICCAI—Volume Part I, Berlin: Springer, pp. 50–57, 2012.
27. Peterlík, I., T. Golembiovský, C. Duriez, and S. Cotin. Complete real-time liver model including glissons capsule, vascularization and parenchyma. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 21: NextMed/MMVR21,196:312–319, 2014.
28. Plantefeve, R. et al. Automatic alignment of pre and intraoperative data using anatomical landmarks for augmented laparoscopic liver surgery. In Biomedical Simulation, edited by F. Bello and S. Cotin, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8789. Berlin: Springer, pp. 58–66, 2014a.
29. Plantefeve, R., I. Peterlik, H. Courtecuisse, R. Trivisonne, J.-P. Radoux, and S. Cotin. Atlas-based transfer of boundary conditions for biomechanical simulation. In: Proceedings of the 17th MICCAI: Part III, Berlin: Springer, pp. 33–40, 2014b.
30. Pratt, P., D. Stoyanov, M. Visentini-Scarzanella, and G.-Z. Yang. Dynamic guidance for robotic surgery using image- constrained biomechanical models. In: Proceedings of the 13th MICCAI: Part I, MICCAI’10, Berlin: Springer, pp. 77–85, 2010.
31. Puerto-Souza, G. and G. Mariottini. Toward long-term and accurate augmented-reality display for minimally-invasive surgery. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5384–5389, 2013.
32. Schaerer, J., C. Casta, J. Pousin, and P. Clarysse. A dynamic elastic model for segmentation and tracking of the heart in mr image sequences. Med. Image Anal. 14(6):738–749, 2010.
33. Schneider, P.J. An algorithm for automatically fitting digitized curves. In: Graphics Gems, edited by A. S. Glassner, Academic Press Professional, Inc., pp. 612–626, 1990
34. Shewchuk, J.R. An introduction to the conjugate gradient method without the agonizing pain. Technical Report, 1994.
35. Speidel, S., S. Roehl, S. Suwelack, R. Dillmann, H. Kenngott, and B. Mueller-Stich. Intraoperative surface reconstruction and biomechanical modeling for soft tissue registration. In: Proceedings of Joint Workshop on New Technologies for Computer/Robot Assisted Surgery, 2011.
36. Stoyanov, D. Surgical vision. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40(2):332–345, 2012.
37. Su, L.-M., B.P. Vagvolgyi, R. Agarwal, C.E. Reiley, R.H. Taylor, and G D. Hager. Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3d-ct to stereoscopic video registration. Urology, 73(4):896–900, 2009.
38. Suwelack, S., S. Röhl, S. Bodenstedt, D. Reichard, R. Dillmann, T. dos Santos, L. Maier-Hein, M. Wagner, J. Wünscher, H. Kenngott, et al. Physics-based shape matching for intraoperative image guidance. Med. Phys. 41(11):111901, 2014.
39. Umale, S. Characterization and modeling of abdominal organs. PhD thesis, Strasbourg, 2012.
40. Umale, S., S. Chatelin, N. Bourdet, C. Deck, M. Diana, P. Dhumane, L. Soler, J. Marescaux, and R. Willinger. Experimental in vitro mechanical characterization of porcine Glisson’s capsule and hepatic veins. J. Biomech. 44(9):1678–1683, 2011.
41. Verscheure, L., L. Peyrodie, A.-S. Dewalle, N. Reyns, N. Betrouni, S. Mordon, and M. Vermandel. Three-dimensional skeletonization and symbolic description in vascular imaging: preliminary results. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 8(2):233–246, 2013.
42. Wittek, A., T. Hawkins, and K. Miller. On the unimportance of constitutive models in computing brain deformation for image-guided surgery. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 8(1):77–84, 2009.
43. Yeh, W.-C., P.-C. Li, Y.-M. Jeng, H.-C. Hsu, P.-L. Kuo, M.-L. Li, P.-M. Yang, and P. H. Lee. Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 28(4):467–474, 2002.
44. Yushkevich, P. A., J. Piven, H. C. Hazlett, R. G. Smith, S. Ho, J. C. Gee, and G. Gerig. User-guided 3d active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3):1116–1128, 2006.