Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: Retrospective cohort study

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 271-278

  Lee, V R ^a   Darney, B G ^a,b   Snowden, J M ^a,c   Main, E K ^d   Gilbert, W ^e   Chung, J ^f   Caughey, A B ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e SUTTER HEALTH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Caesarean delivery; elective induction of labour; maternal obesity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OBESITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINATAL PERIOD; PERINEUM INJURY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CALIFORNIA; COMPLICATION; DYSTOCIA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CESAREAN SECTION; DYSTOCIA; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; LOGISTIC MODELS; OBESITY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84952790960     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13807     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Fisher SC, Kim SY, Sharma AJ, Rochat R, Morrow B. Is obesity still increasing among pregnant women? Prepregnancy obesity trends in 20 states, 2003-2009. Prev Med 2013; 56: 372-8.
2. Heslehurst N, Ells LJ, Simpson H, Batterham A, Wilkinson J, Summerbell CD. Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequities in 36,821 women over a 15-year period. BJOG 2007; 114: 187-94.
3. Chu SY, Kim SY, Lau J, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, et al., Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 223-8.
4. Heslehurst N, Simpson H, Ells LJ, Rankin J, Wilkinson J, Brown TJ, et al., The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obesity Rev 2008; 9: 635-83.
5. Mission JF, Marshall NE, Caughey AB. Obesity in pregnancy: a big problem and getting bigger. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013; 68: 389-99.
6. Chen A, Feresu SA, Fernandez C, Rogan WJ. Maternal obesity and the risk of infant death in the United States. Epidemiology 2009; 20: 74-81.
7. Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Snowden JM, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Induction of labor compared with expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 502.e1-8.
8. Rosenstein MG, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 76-82.
9. The Joint Commission. Specifications manual for Joint Commission National Quality Core Measures. Appendix A Table 11.07: Conditions possibly justifying elective delivery prior to 39 weeks gestation. 2012; [http://manual.jointcommission.org/releases/TJC2013A/AppendixATJC.html] Accessed 22 October 2012.
10. Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, et al., Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 252-63.
11. Stock S, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ 2012; 344: e2838.
12. Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, Jacob L, Nicholson JM, Kaimal A, et al., Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 761-9.
13. Bodnar LM, Abrams B, Bertolet M, Gernand AD, Parisi SM, Himes KP, et al., Validity of birth certificate-derived maternal weight data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014; 28: 203-12.
14. Wolfe H, Timofeev J, Tefera E, Desale S, Driggers RW. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 53.e1-5.
15. Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 249.e1-6.
16. Bailit JL, Grobman W, Zhao Y, Wapner RJ, Reddy UM, Varner MW, et al., Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 103.e1-7.
17. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 561: nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 911-5.