Utilization of minimally invasive surgery in endometrial cancer care: A Quality and cost disparity

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 91-100

  Fader, Amanda N ^a   Matsuno Weise, R ^b   Sinno, Abdulrahman K ^b   Tanner, Edward J ^b   Borah, Bijan J ^b   Moriarty, James P ^b   Bristow, Robert E ^b   Makary, Martin A ^b   Pronovost, Peter J ^b   Hutfless, Susan ^b   Dowdy, Sean C ^b  

^a Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFTERCARE; BLACK PERSON; CANCER CENTER; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CAUCASIAN; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; EARLY CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FASCIAL DEHISCENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; HISPANIC; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INFECTION RISK; LENGTH OF STAY; LOW VOLUME HOSPITAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAID; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT CARE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; SEPSIS; SURGICAL INFECTION; UNITED STATES; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WOUND DEHISCENCE; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ECONOMICS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HOSPITALIZATION; HOSPITALS, HIGH-VOLUME; HOSPITALS, LOW-VOLUME; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MEDICAID; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; UNITED STATES; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 84952720359     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001180     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Mangano DT. Perioperative medicine: NHLBI working group deliberations and recommendations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004;18:1-6.
2. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No: CD001546. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub3.
3. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050-9.
4. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Möller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. Art. No: CD003145. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2.
5. Aimaq R, Akopian G, Kaufman HS. Surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Am Surg 2011; 77:1290-4.
6. Kiran RP, El-Gazzaz GH, Vogel JD, Remzi FH. Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:232-8.
7. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No: CD003677. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
8. Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, Al-Khaduri M, Kew F, Lopes AD. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. Art. No: CD006655. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
9. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5331-6.
10. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study [published erratum appears in J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1570]. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:695-700.
11. Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, Russo T, Zullo F. Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: A meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol 2009;112: 415-21.
12. Scalici J, Laughlin BB, Finan MA, Wang B, Rocconi RP. The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: An ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136:512-5.
13. Fader AN, Arriba LN, Frasure HE, von Gruenigen VE. Endometrial cancer and obesity: epidemiology, biomarkers, prevention and survivorship. Gynecol Oncol 2010;114: 121-7.
14. Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Available at: https://www. sgo.org/newsroom/sgo-issues/sgo-issues-may-15-2014/. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
15. Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2013. Available at: www. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
16. Changes in the NIS sampling and weighting strategy for 1998. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/Changes-in-NIS-Design-1998.pdf. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
17. Whyte JL, Engel-Nitz NM, Teitelbaum A, Gomez Rey G, Kallich JD. An Evaluation of algorithms for identifying metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancer in administrative claims data. Med Care 2015;53:e49-57.
18. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.Med Care 1998;36:8-27.
19. Overview of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators. 2013. Available at: www.qualityindicators. ahrq.gov/Modules/psi-resources.aspx. Retrieved November 15, 2015.
20. Cost-To-charge ratio files: 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) User Guide. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. Available at: https://www.hcup-us. ahrq.gov/db/state/CCR2011NISUserGuide.pdf. Retrieved March 26, 2015.
21. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: using appropriate price indices for analyses of health care expenditures or income across multiple years. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. Available at: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/about-meps/Price-Index.shtml. Retrieved March 26, 2015.
22. Makary MA. A minimally-invasive approach to healthcare reform. Wall Street J 2014.
23. Xu T, Hutfless SM, Cooper MA, Zhou M, Massie AB, Makary MA. Hospital cost implications of increased use of minimally invasive surgery. JAMA Surg 2014;150:489-90.
24. Wysham WZ, Kim KH, Roberts JM, Sullivan SA, Campbell SB, Roque DR, et al. Obesity and perioperative pulmonary complications in robotic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:33.e1-7.
25. Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K, Blansit K, Thompson CA, Brooks R, et al. The centralization of robotic surgery in high-volume centers for endometrial cancer patients-A study of 6560 cases in the U.S. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:128-32.
26. Chan JK, Sherman AE, Kapp DS, Zhang R, Osann KE, Maxwell L, et al, Influence of gynecologic oncologists on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:832-8.
27. Mahdi H, Lockhart D, Moslemi-Kebria M, Rose PG. Racial disparity in the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014;134:510-5.
28. Conrad LB, Ramirez PT, Burke W, Naumann RW, Ring KL, Munsell MF, et al. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:1121-7.
29. Kroft J, Li Q, Saskin R, Elit L, Bernardini MQ, Gien LT. Trends over time in the use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138: 536-41.
30. Cooper MA, Hufless S, Segev DL, Ibrahim A, Lyu H, Makary MA. Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review. BMJ 2014;349:g4198.
31. Stovall DW, Fernandez AS, Cohen SA. Laparoscopy training in United States obstetric and gynecology residency programs. JSLS 2006;10:11-5.
32. Sfakianos GP, Frederick PJ, Kendrick JE, Straughn JM, Kilgore LC, Huh WK. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: A survey of fellows and fellowship directors. Int J Med Robot 2014;6:405-12.
33. Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell DA Jr. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: A report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:531-7.